Students have to wear tracking devices while on school grounds to insure safety.
Saudi Arabian women have to wear lo jacks forever when they move too far from the kitchen.
I’m gonna pick the former, everytime.
Not to say that the former isn’t fucked up.
Double posting since SRK didn’t want to edit my last post the first time. If I’m uninformed as you say, what makes what you say right? Please don’t tell from experience or your understanding. Because I actually read Black’s Law and my state’s laws whenever I have free time.
I had a teacher who uh, did this instead of just saying forget the rule and ducking out to use the restroom. Or having handled her business in requisite break/lunch times.
It was a brand new high school, but it wasn’t locked down with security. And luckily it wasn’t my class but the same teacher in a different block of the day. She was kind of a psycho though, so even if it wasn’t to be expected, it was possible she’d do this.
Furthermore, yeah a star student ruined the grading curve for the rest of us. Typed up notes from every previous class, on some very not fruitful elective class on just balancing your checkbook and using the newspaper to find a job. Stuff completely outdated only a few years later, if not already because this was like in 1999, Freshman year. Everyone else acted like a normal person per the assignments, nope psycho teach gave us all F’s for not having 100% of the assignments done her way-of which that one girl obliged like a robot. Hard to read if she resented this kind of classroom since she was capable of better, having known her as a classmate for years. The teach even had some people locked down to turn things in in the 2nd part of the year to try to get their grade only up to a made-up C. I made up the class for an A at a different high school, even after reporting it to administration that this only F on my semester’s grades of all A’s was her fuck up holding me down from colleges giving me a chance, that lady can go be catwoman with a litter box on her own damn time, per some joke comic I saw on imgur recently exactly that situation.
As someone who works at a school and is in charge of keeping track of a large number of children who I often don’t even know their names, I have to say this sounds a lot more like a legit attempt to solve an existing problem than some horrifying Big Brother government tracking thing. People dump their kids off at school and then expect the school to monitor their whereabouts, if some kid decides to wander off like a dumbass and do whatever they want the school will still get held responsible.
The specifics of how they go about it may be debatable, but we’re talking about kids here. Plenty of schools already require students to wear specific uniforms and such, it’s not like the government is requiring mandatory RFID tags for all adult citizens
But there is no injured party, nor damaged property. So again, by your definition, not a crime.
Why are you trying to prove me wrong? It’s the justice system’s definition. And you’re missing a couple of things as to why you’re still wrong. If you really think you’re right, go fuck some kid and tell that to them in court.
Here’s the thing–in theory, you’re correct, but in practice, there are plenty of instances throughout history in which cases that don’t fit your description of a crime (injured parties/property damage) have been treated as crimes–i.e. fines in less severe cases, conviction in more severe cases. This would suggest that a criminal act is defined by what would happen to you if you committed it egregiously enough.
Plus, the government can claim itself as the injured party, which renders that particular portion of the definition somewhat toothless.
The government claiming itself as the injured party in an alleged crime, is like a child rapist claiming himself as the victim because he got his dick caught in the child’s braces.
Just because something is a law, does not make disobeying it a crime.
If that were the case, then the Constitution itself is a crime, considering how many laws out there it blatantly violates.
Absurdity abounds.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Did I miss something? 
I’m not saying I’m right, I’m highlighting the implications of what you are saying. If you don’t see the difference between the to catch a predator example and actually molesting a child, and how that wouldn’t be a crime under your own definition, then I don’t know what to tell you. Why don’t you go fuck some kid and tell them it’s not a crime as there’s no injured party.
That is hurting someone…
So is the Chris Hansen game.
So is attempted murder e.g. hiring a hitman.
The latter two being clear cut cases of attempt to commit a crime re: definite intent to perpetrate harm.
Speeding… is a trifle more subjective.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
The kid becomes the injured party! And why are we talking about raping children? THE FUCK IS THIS? I’m sitting here trying to tell you that you can fight speeding tickets and shit. And you’re telling me I’m wrong, because you then it would mean you could rape children?
I wish there was an gif that could explain how I feel right now.
Never change, SRK.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Only on SRK will idiots justify this shit by comparing it to something that has nothing to do with it with X religion or X other country. I don’t think some of you even realize the scope of how wrong and fucked up this is.
Because SRK is totally capable of discussing these types of issues.
For the record, I think that game is bullshit.
Those kids definitely want to fuck.
Hansen is the REAL criminal.
Here some copypasta:
Track kids instead of improve education system. Stay free Texas.
go search yourself…yes you are missing alot.
Why wouldn’t it be?