Your first problem was ever going to Kotaku. They’re the videogame version of the DailyMail.
All of their articles are made purely to generate traffic and commotion, that’s all they want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?client=mv-google&hl=en-GB&gl=GB&v=HJihi5rB_Ek&nomobile=1
Gaming ‘Feminists’ such as Anita are nothing short of whiny, entitled retards. This vídeo proves it
yo dawg, i hate feminists so much!
i wouldnt even let one suck my dick cause of how much i hate them
id rather let a dude suck my dick than one of those ugly stupid bitch feminists
but not a black dude, because theyre reverse-racist and want affirmative action and shit
fuckin faggot ass nigro-feminists
edit-trollin? whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
I’m quite confident you don’t know what “prove” means.
Meanwhile all of the hus and fuss over feminists trying to claim control over a field not many of them remotely know about…I’m sitting here wondering where my african american rep is?
I mean other than cyborg recently…All of the sony collection of games seems to be white dudes. White womens crying about peach and her homegirl zelda being portrayed wrong, I’m wondering how do I even get the chance to be portrayed?
Where’s my clamor and one sided arguments to defend one’s own self interest?
Hey, I figured that since I was about to disagree with someone I’d get a little troll badge anyway, so why not go all out? Besides, telling the truth is often considered trolling. And it’s sad because there used to be a real need for trolls, but they got what they wanted and now the only ones left are radical nuts. I’m totally for equal rights for all, which is why it’s so bullshit that they’re even called trolls. What, non-trolls don’t matter? That’s why I’m a troll-and-elf-and-all-living-and-some-nonliving-things-ist, because I’m pretty progressive. Except I hate trolls, because they’re always falsely accusing everyone of rape.
There, I just proved my point with proof.
Proved what? That your post, much like a majority of the arguments here, is nonsensical tripe? We’re supposed to compare that crap, obviously in the name of poorly made satire, to a well worded, in depth analysis of an argument from somebody that in many of your minds should be on your side? Or that feminists can for all intents and purposes pull up the most negative male examples as the majority, but if we so much as make a comparison with a negative female aspect in it, it’s no longer proof and suddenly a strawman argument? Not all feminists are cock hating, entitled white women that know nothing of what it’s like to be underprivileged, but that doesn’t mean that the VOCAL majority doesn’t fall under a vague semblance of that category.
I know I should be far beyond expecting an actual argument from feminists at this point, but it’s really depressing that with multiple examples of proof on the table showing that the genders aren’t nearly as skewed rights or representation-wise as is touted, nothing is said towards it and we instead have to argue in circles about new topics until the ''BIG BAD MRAS!!!" supply proof and we have to move on to something else without closure on the original argument. It’s why tumblr age feminazis aren’t taken seriously by many, because they argue about inane shit that gets shut down, then they clamber up some more useless crap and the cycle repeats. Stick to a fucking argument, supply proof for it and build a sturdy platform then it might be taken seriously.
Can someone explain the word “objectification” to me? It seems to change depending on the situation. So can anybody define it because I am lost.
It’ll differ depending on who you ask or who is defining it for you. At the very loosest of terms (the ones feminists tend to use) it can be regarding something as only serving a singular purpose, whereas sexual objectification is basically viewing somebody as only being good for their genitals. The problem with it being brought up constantly in ‘why men are bad’ arguments, is that it is nearly always mutual and thus not indicative of a flaw on either side. In the strictest sense of the word, it’s something that can be owned without rights, human consideration or care. The reason it’s such a misinterpreted word is that, much like misogyny, people pull the definition out of the dictionary that best suits their argument.
Objectification is when you treat people like things other than human.
For example.
Feminist just want a foothold into another part of the entertainment industry .Video games is the final frontier they wiped male father figures off the face of television ,they have demasculated men on television into fucking morons who just their to make my wife doesnt want to fuck me anymore because I’ve got fat jokes or honey can u please not deprive me of pussy jokes every fucking show.
Feminist crying about Dragons Crown make me fucking die laughing really your complaining about a female necromancer who is built like a fucking fertility god of lore .the character design in that game on a surface level is shallow but its deeper than what they think. Yall can tak yall bell hooks reading asses on somewhere .Go deal with them clowns in hollywood. Gaming isnt gonna bend over backwards because yall buy mario kart and angry birds
You mean my post modeled after some “arguments” against feminism was nonsensical tripe? Well that’s weird as hell, how could that even happen?
Of course, you must know that those same arguments have been used against every single movement or group that ever questioned the status quo, which should make you think.
So what’s your point, that in a country of 150 million women, there will be a lot of bad women who call themselves feminists? Ok, does anyone disagree? Or that there are some problems in feminism with white women not recognizing that they’re often racist and drowning out even more oppressed voices? I said that very same thing in a thread a few months ago, and you could say the same about the atheist movement, or the field of biology, or even MRAs! Or are none of them racist assholes? People see and understand all your posts, we’re just not impressed with proving such simple, obvious, and ultimately meaningless statements and then making unjustified generalizations from them. Maybe we’re smarter than you think.
I’ll try and explain this in the most simplistic manner that I can be bothered with at this point in the thread: nobody here is saying ALL feminists are bad or that you should condemn the ones that actually do things for their community for the sins of the vocal majority, what we’re saying is that developers shouldn’t cater to the loud, bickering idiots on EITHER side and that if you let the most obnoxious and aggressive representatives of your gender spearhead a movement, it’s going to be ignored by anybody even remotely sensible. Alongside that, how is it fair at all that whenever these arguments are brought up, the shrieking 13 year old boys yelling RAPE HER and GET TO DA KITCHEN BITCH can be used as an image for our gender, but the attention whores and check-your-privilege feminazis can’t be used for females? Oh, wait, I answered my own question: because much like other facets of our society, you have to handle women with kiddy gloves or you’re an outrageous sexist.
As for a point, there are many, and you can see the myriad of them that have been made and then quickly swept under the rug by simply going through all of the prior pages. I’m not going to reiterate shit that has already been chalked out and discussed to bottlefeed you, so you’ll have to take an actual initiative if you want to make an counter argument in your next post. The problem with their argument is that they don’t have a solidified podium to stand on, because they’re all too eager to jump to a completely different or irrelevant argument when you’re backed into a corner, which makes them seem like complete mongoloids. Take for example the outcry for what was apparently nonexistent proof about the deficit between domestic abuse by gender. When proof was supplied, ya’ll were more than happy to ignore it and then act like it never happened, before running to your next baseless argument or resorting to adhominem, which makes for a boring albeit hilarious debate.
Feminist are mostly white woman who feel that due to civil rights helping people of color get treated decently .They need to get better treatment than all races and will go to extreme lengths to express this. Its white matriarchy at its finest you grow up being told your the princess every story is about you .You are the main ones taking care of the country when the white men go to war ,go to school etc .You start to believe your own bullshit. Feminist groups are like the Queen of snow white . Bitch is already fine but she has to kill off (abortion clinics by the shit ton,planned b ,backing policies that break down the family dynamic economically and socially) or force the other women to assimilate under her idea of what freedom and being a woman is .Like honestly think about it there is a whole institution of thought that projects white women as fucking princesses and if you harm them or offend them you are the devil .Look at the criminal justice system and media for example. Feminism is all about maintaining the status quo white women are queens and white men are there to be fucking sir lancelot everybody else is peasantry unless money is involved .
Ask an Asian ,black or hispanic woman why they are feminist they just wanted to be treated like actual women not treated like a fucking sex object,some type of mammy or clean up lady.Most women of color or fighting to be considered actual people.
I think you’re kidding, I think, but seriously this kind of attitude is dangerous man. Games and things in general get shittier when they’ve got race and gender “quotas.” Where does it end, too? Gotta have the autism spectrum on there. Wheelchairs, too. Bald people. Short people–midgets! Gay men, flying shitting dragon-fetuses, it never stoppppsss!!!
Eugh.
Anyways.
Someone summed up it once about feminism, that I quote often: “Feminism is the idea that we can make both sexes equal by focusing solely on the issues of one of them.”
Stop posting that whack job’s vid.
She’s already gotten more attention than she rightfully deserves.
>make kickstarter >buy 1000 dollar shoes a few months later
You sure are helping women out, Anita.
[
That was the other kickstarter woman, not her.
Stay classy, SRK.