haud yer weesht
Bullshit. Here’s every tweet I posted from the time that I started tweeting about the issue, to the time Mightfo shot the snarkiness:
http://i.imgur.com/vhhsslW.png
http://i.imgur.com/vs4BTd7.png
http://i.imgur.com/a2uz1GE.png
http://i.imgur.com/ZgE7XFX.png
http://i.imgur.com/DjupGqf.png
http://i.imgur.com/4dYaCAv.png
http://i.imgur.com/zao9TY2.png
Let people judge for themselves whether I was hostile or not. The only tweet I deleted during that time frame, I explained the reason for. All of that is on my Twitter page for the world to see, I have nothing to hide.
…missing Person says, as he furiously masturbates for the 14th time tonight over his planned e-verbal assassination of Ian
Not really much of an assassination when his so-called target already commit professional suicide
I mean, there is a pretty big difference between “Have you had surgery yet?” and “Do you have a dick?” you know. It still shouldn’t have blown up into the big mess it has become (especially with the wild rumors that SKD mentioned that were flying around in an attempt to ban DC from tournaments forever) but come on, dude.
Also someone ban Ash Crimson already
Ban me for what? I’ve done nothing wrong. Sounds like you’re just upset, grow up.
Like it or not, people can’t get banned for shitposting.
At least that’s what I’ve gathered from the events that have transpired.
Ass Crimson is Wizards alt account.
If you ban people for shit posting GD would disappear up it’s own arse
Considering that everyone involved on twitter are lurking in this thread (and they are, in case you are unaware) what you said on twitter doesn’t matter when you go on a rampage here.
Soopercam your responses sound like a “2/10 wouldn’t bang” type of criticism. You really won’t be satisfied until the exact %s of what gets covered cater exactly to the frequency you ideally look for?
And don’t move the goal posts. You said SRK won’t publish work of some content creators on purpose, I asked you to show it and you back out “oh yeah people don’t make content like they used to”… Then the problem isn’t with SRK after all?
Because people don’t get annoyed when they don’t get answers for simple questions and get blocked and insulted instead.
And if the perpetrators of this idiocy are lurking this thread, I want every single one of you to know that you are ***A BUNCH OF PUNK ASS BITCHES… ***
Stand up for yourselves, and don’t hide behind inane, vague words. If someone says something you don’t like, confront them about it and fucking COMMUNICATE PROPERLY, YOU STUPID, PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE MORONS.
AND TAKE THAT BULLSHIT ASS “ARTICLE” OFF THE FRONT PAGE.
Before the internet and cell phones existed, people actually used to communicate and talk to each other.
Now everyone communicates through technology and they are forgetting how to communicate directly, but because everything anyone says is recorded for all eternity which can be used against them, people are afraid to communicate.
Also, I would like to say that after observing the facts concerning the events that started this thread, Ian Walker is a really horrible person for posting all that libel on the FGC.
yo po pimpus, calm down my friend it’s just the internet
So everything boils down to something that DC allegedly said but no proof what so ever that he actually inquired about, even among friends? Its possible he didn’t even recognize the other person when they were stalking him.
He definitely recognized her, hence the question he wanted to ask. It isn’t really unlike him to ask or want to ask something that unfiltered.
I do find it funny that people are using the word “stalker/stalking” when it was one incident of someone wanting to confront someone over something that pissed them off. May as well call someone that accidentally bumps into another person an attempted murderer.
Does no one else have a problem with the “TOs must police disputes between players” line that M’Ellis is taking? It’s one thing to say “it would be great if TOs would get involved if shit blows up” and another be like “TOs have failed as TOs if they don’t personally police morality and tone at their events.” M’Ellis is free to say whatever whatever s/he (? not sure how he identifies himself so I’m going with male pronoun, no offense intended if any) wants but a stance like that is only going to fracture the FGC. On one hand TOs (just like anyone else) are free to ban (or not ban) whoever they want, for whatever reason they want. Hell, I could start a tourney only for straight white men tomorrow and there isn’t anything anyone could do about it. No one’s being forced to do anything or socially/financially disadvantaged as a result, you’re free to choose which tourneys you attend, or don’t.
The thing is that legal rights/obligations aside, if you DO want people to at least generally agree on a code of conduct of sorts, NEUTRALITY is undoubtedly the best policy. It sucks if you think people are being mean to you at a tourney but that’s something you can resolve on your own. You know, talk to him, money match him on stream, flame him on Twitter, whatever. Or you know, just avoid him. But what do you want the TOs to do? Tell him to stop? Kick him out? Ban him from all future tourneys? Like it or not he has paid his money to be at the tourney so he does in fact have a right to be there. Beyond that, what is the TO supposed to do going forward now that he’s made it clear that he’s open to banning people from tourneys on request? Next time some guy calls my friend a scrub? He’s banned. My friend pops off on stream cause he lost to some other guy’s alleged netplay tactics? Ban the netplayer. Or hell, I don’t want SJWs starting drama at my tourneys? Ban all minorities. Why not? It’s accepted practice now.
And that’s what you call a slippery slope. Again, you’re free to say what you want, write what you want, do what you want. But don’t complain afterwards if things don’t turn out the way you like in the future, because even if you might be on the winning side this time, there’s no guarantee you’ll be there next time.
Or saying someone never talking to you is harassment.
How do you know that he recognized her? Perhaps he heard from friends that she had a sex change? At no point besides at the restaurant where they ever together in the same room. Which wasn’t until well she’d been trying to find him at the bar, on the game floor, in the lobby and finally at the restaurant. And she only went to those spots because he was allegedly there. And they didn’t even talk at that point so there is still no proof that he recognized her.
Did she not try and locate him? She did not try and gather information from those around him in an effort to confront him? Did she not try and be in the same place as him? She couldn’t have waited until they incidentally bumped into each other?
Would you not be freaked out if someone was stalking you? Or do transgenders not apply to stalking?
There is no proof that the person that “quoted” DC even used the same terminology. He may have asked pre-op or post-op and the mutual friend and phrased it worse by saying that he wanted to know if she still had the dick. Which is basically the same question but insensitive.
http://www.loveisrespect.org/is-this-abuse/types-of-abuse/what-is-stalking
She did several things that this site describes as stalking.
Asking “are you pre-op or post-op?” is the exact same thing as asking “so do you have your dick still?” to anybody that has a brain. One is not more respectful than the other.
When people ask me, I just send them pictures, since they’re so curious.