Okay. I never said its ‘random’. Nothing about tradition is ‘random’. It’s history and history that someone has an involvement in or idolizes in someway is going to be a persuasive force. Hence, I feel the arguments coming from ST supporters are grounded in this type of historical logic appeal. I’m not saying its an illegitimate line or argumentation, I’m saying that I don’t find your argument convincing.
Okay, that’s fine. I appreciate that your giftedness for the game makes you a superior player but this train of thought leads to a narrowing, and not an expansion of players given the already high execution bar for any fighting game. For you, if you take execution requirements from a 10 to an 8 would that be too much? 8 to 5? There’s no level of what is too little execution for you except to infer that HDR is now ‘too’ easy and ST is ‘just right’. Here’s the truth for the vast majority of players who have played and maintained some level of dedication, there are realistic plateaus for people that ‘tiers’ do not account for. It doesn’t matter how much football I play I’m not making the NFL, it doesn’t matter who I play or how much, I’m not winning EVO, this argument at its best is short sided and at worst blatantly discriminatory.
Maybe its just me, but I don’t think your FPS analogies are very persuasive. Especially in a game series like SF2 where CR. MK can do 15% of someone’s life. I almost draw that SF4’s combo execution system would be preferable to you than HDR except I believe I know you well enough to say that’s not what you’re saying at all… so I admit my confusion here.
The personal attack against David Sirlin and his knowledge of the game aside, you are looking at this like the blind elitist living on the top floor of the Trump Tower wondering how people live on 50K a year. How can I look at myself in the mirror? Its easy when I’m having more fun. You seem to imply that we should have some sort of guilt about being less good at execution. But this refuses to put execution of the mind into the equation. I can’t do cammy’s 8 hit renda cancel super combo but I know my spacing well and the best part of my game is poking and footsies I think, does that mean I’m ‘bad’ at execution? No, it means execution is multifaceted and must be judged as such, the problem is acknowledging execution as multifaceted introduces the necessity to judge it in a subjective and not completely objective way. And as a proud basketball player in the Hoosier State, your basketball analogy is way off base. Basketball courts are regulation no matter where you go, the rim is 10 feet everywhere, go watch Hoosiers in case you didn’t see Gene Hackman explain that at Hinkle Fieldhouse. It’s not who can do the fanciest dunk who wins. It’s not the point guard who can do crazy dribbles, its the player who has solid fundamentals, doesn’t turn the ball over, and has good shooting form who plays well in a team game like basketball, of course this is in the acknowledgment that these things can only over come so much of an athletic disadvantage or in the case of the analogy here, fighting game talent. The court didn’t change, the rim didn’t change, the rules of the game didn’t change. All it did was make hyper athleticism or ridiculous finger dexterity in our case a lesser part of the equation. Also please note again the appeal to history and tradition. “It was this way and you know it was this way and you couldn’t do it before but you can do it now, so don’t you feel guilty?” People complain that I show appeals to history as the basis for large parts of their argument but continue to use historical appeals…
So now you’ve extended your metaphor to hating on women’s sports (who by definition at the peak of their potential are less athletic and must over compensate in other ways, a la the WNBA) which is fine but wouldn’t a better metaphor be like bringing in the 3 point line? The ball is the same, its still SF2, the court is the same, the engine is still the same, okay so now a 3 pointer isn’t the NBA 3 pointer at 22 feet but the college one at 20.5 feet. That’s your complaint?
I personally think this last point is the most legitimate part of your argument, and at its best its specious. The question isn’t whether people are interested in learning what other people already know and playing catch up. The question is whether we move backwards and play catch up or blaze a new trail and set off on our own, making a clear break from the past and saying this is what we’re going to do. Some people will never change, that’s fine. But the fighting game community in North America is changing radically and for SF2 to survive in this environment as a national level type game, and not a regionally divided one, we need to coalesce around one standard as a tournament standard. Who knows, maybe its simply not possible, but the consequences of obstinacy one way or another are far worse than the consequences of picking a standard and moving forward and the truth is for 80% of the geographic space of the country and the players who live there, logistically your preference simply isn’t an option, and certainly going to Japan to play arcade ST to learn the game like they know it isn’t an option.
So until someone who advocates for ST as the standard explains to me how to make sure it isn’t a logistical nightmare and players across the country can play the same standard to ensure we’re all on the same page and game differences aren’t deciding tournament results, how do you argue against HDR as national tournament standard other than some people just don’t want to change?