Display lag dot com states they take the average the readings of all three bars. http://www.displaylag.com/testing-method/
OK, but the average of 16.7 would still need to be subtracted from the readings.
Oh I agree, I wasn’t trying to contest that.
I was just saying Display lag dot com takes 3 readings, top middle and bottom and get the average
What ever number they get left you take away 16.7 for the final reading.
Going by DL’s method they’d want to subtract 8.35 from their average readings. Still, the easiest and still accurate way would be to simply take a reading at the bottom and subtract 16.7 from it.
For plasma I don’t know what method they’d want to use. Plasma pulses the frame all at once according to what I’ve read, but I suppose if you want a like for like comparison to CRT you’d still subtract 16.7 ms from the display. According to what I’ve read at least, a plasma should have the same reading on all 3 regions. I wonder if it’s the same for OLED, considering OLED is most similar to plasma, in many ways, even when it comes to image retention…
Can you show me where you got that 8.35 from as I am not seeing it.
As for Plasmas, plasma screens pulse several times in a single frame while the light source from a LCD is constant and the image changes with a wipe from top to bottom, almost like a scan.
I don’t know if OLED screens changes with a LCD like scan or is the whole screen drawn at once?
I belie you also have to take account for response time and subtract that also from your reading.
8.35 ms is the centre of a screen refresh and also the average of 0+8.35+16.7/3. Yours need the base average of a single frame subtracted from the agave of the readings.
Is BenQ RL2460HT the current standard monitor choice for tournaments?
I can’t find any info on lag with my DLP television, can anyone help ? It has a game mode I set it to.
TV model is:
Samsung HL56A650 56-inch 1080p DLP TV
Sort of, the BenQ RL2460HT is the current monitor that was licensed by Evo as the Evo Monitor of choice.
But I recommend the BenQ RL2455HM over the RL2460HT as its cheaper model with the exact same performance.
It lacks the HDMI out (just get a splitter) and the Fight Mode which is more of a gimmick than a needed feature.
Try Displaylag.com
What are the go-to benq displays that also do 120/144hz (24")?
It seems like the display lag site is missing quite a few models, some of which I know for a fact perform similarly to the 60hz RL2455HM etc.
Only way to find out is to buy your own testing equipment(Leo Bodnar) or search your model in google hoping good review sites show input lag, like Displaylag.com, tftcentral.co.uk etc.
Displaylag dot com is mostly volunteer ran and donation driven
You can see trends in various brands and make an estimate on the performance on missing brands.
Hi, sorry to resurrect this.
There’s a website here in Korea that regularly reviews monitors and measures lag by comparing it a CRT. I don’t anything about what method is good or bad or whatever, just putting it here as an extra resource for people.
Here’s an example of the page that measures lag for the LG38UC99 (click no.10) --> http://playwares.com/dpreview/53094565#
Using google translate on Chrome should be enough for you to navigate through the site.
B)
Supposedly the OSSC is supposed to have a firmware upgrade in the works that comes with a lag test feature.
So hori came out with some portable HD monitors again. I know the first one that I had didn’t have HDMI inputs but a lot of people claimed that it “felt” lagless.
So I tried the leobodnar testers at both 720p and 1080p.
Both came out spectacular. About 3ms of lag on the 720 and 4ms of lag on the 1080p. Not bad for a portable 15inch monitor with speakers that you can take anywhere with you.
edit
720p
1080p
https://youtu.be/XuVWWAoYWbs
actually guess it might be less than that. 1.5ms for 720p and 2-2.5ms for the 1080p.
Don’t you take the average of the 3 numbers with the Leo Bodnar, so the from the 1080p video it should be around 10 ms
No, that is incorrect. We literally went over this several posts above.