There are Asus monitors with in the size, price range, lag score you are looking for
Yeah, it is between the ASUS VS238H-P 23" and BenQ GL2460HM. Its between those two really. Unless a sale happens for valentines day. So i might wait just to see whats up. Maybe i find out what im looking for on the benq. More than likely these two monitors are very similar in lag input.
I only see the GL2450, maybe those two are similar enough though
http://i958.photobucket.com/albums/ae64/DEZALB/Untitled_zps10u9o3jz.png
BenQ GL2460 has no hdmi or speakers, BenQ GL2460HM has hdmi and speakers, that’s the difference.
i still dont see GL2460 anywhere on the lagtest site, only GL2450.
but i found this in a product description on one of the test sites
“The BenQ GL2460HM is a solid gaming monitor as well, thanks to the quick 2ms (gray-to-gray) pixel response and 10,5ms input lag (measured using Leo Bodnar Video Signal Lag Tester), users will get to enjoy smooth gaming experience with this display and fire commands in the keyboard with faster monitor response…”
Oh sorry yeah thought it said GL2460.
Anyone know if the Benq GW2760hm has decent input lag? Seems the 2750hm is very good.
It’s not listed on there
Could be too new, its not even widely available globally yet
Mookie- if your looking for a 27" benq go with the BenQ GL2760H same as the GL246h 10ms input lag
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IZBIMLK/ref=twister_B00XUFL6NM?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
Ok thanks. The Gl2760h is about $50 more in Australia but I guess if there is no data on the GW2760hm then it’s worth it to know it’s sub 1 frame lag. Cheers
This small portable gaming monitor reported under a frame of lag with the Leo Bodnar.
https://gaemspge.com/m155-personal-gaming-monitor.html
That’s 19 ms at the bottom of the screen?? If that’s on top of the original 16.7 ms it takes to draw a screen then that’s an entire extra frame of lag. If that includes the 16.7 ms then it’s only an additional 2 ms on top of the 17 it takes for a screen to render from to to bottom.
Ok I just checked. Bare minimum the device will report is 16.7 ms at the bottom of the screen. This display only has an additional 2 ms of lag. That’s really good! That’s way under a frame. Someone really needs to update the definition of lag, because people will assume 19 ms as being over a frame, when a reading of 19 ms is really 2 ms of lag. Need to always subtract the original frame being drawn from what’s read at the bottom of the screen.
That is why you always take 3 readings, Top, Middle and Bottom. As you go from top to bottom the readings get longer.
For a 27" Monitor, I use the ASUS MX279H, I see it sometimes as low as $230… On the displaylag.com, it’s rated at 09ms. The BenQ noted by @DEZALB is a better deal though!
I been telling people go for the Ben Q for months now.
A lot of people read the middle and simply tell people that number is the input lag. Reading that, I would assume that’s on top of the original 16.7 ms. If the middle of the screen is 12 ms then the input lag should be somewhere around 2 to 4 ms. Right now, Sabin is tweeting to people it’s 12 ms of input lag, when the reality is it’s much better than that. The bottom is probably the more accurate of the 3 since that’s the entire screen being drawn, then just subtract 16.7 from that number and you have your lag.