Niggas change cloths. Jordans are popular. 15% of the population is black. blue jeans aren’t exclusive to criminals. White T-shirts are worn by everyone.
Is this seriously how detective work is done?
Can’t wait to frisk everyone ever wearing a polo shirt cause a Caucasian in a polo shirt robbed my sister!!
Yeah, that’s a pretty retarded question. Now if people were like cartoon characters that never changed clothes then great, but I’m gonna venture a safe guess and say that most people change clothes after a crime.
Stop and frisk was *upheld *by judge (she said it was just being implemented wrong/racist). That is absolute crazy. When this going to higher courts? Bloomberg is cartoon.
And there are a lot of things that would work to keep citizens safe, that doesnt mean it is just (this is an old debate). Talk to people who grew up under dictators like Marcos, etc; some of them genuinely miss the low general crime that is characteristic of iron fist, authoritarian dictatorships and fact that you could leave your doors unlocked at night while you take a midnight city stroll with your honey not worry about anything in exchange for giving the govt complete authoritative control.
I really cant believe this stuff. And it not much hope with people focusing on distractions like wondering whether it works or not, whether it racist or not, and thinking that the judge nerfed it… garbage. Supreme court fix this.
Stopped reading here.
NOW it makes sense.
Coming from a person who believes that men cannot be raped and it only applies to women, I did not find her judgement to be surprising at all. Here’s a question, if half the population is women, what percent of the population that is stopped and frisked is men, is it also half?
No, the majority of stops are because of "furtive movements."
From the 2011 numbers, 15.9% of stops were because of “fits a relevant description” and 4.6% were because of “clothes commonly used in a crime.”
@Negative-Zero
If someone gets robbed at gunpoint, and 3 minutes later a police officer sees someone 5 blocks away who matches the description of the perp. Then it’s not unreasonable nor a violation of the persons 4th amendment rights for the cop to stop question and frisk the person.
You’re saying “niggas change clothes” no, they normally don’t. Criminals are by large stupid and every criminal I’ve seen aprehended minutes after the crime was commited was wearing the same clothes they wore when they commited the crime.
It seems to me like you guys are telling me that if the perpetrator of a crime wears clothes that are commonly worn, that the police shouldn’t stop people in the area that the crime was committed based on the description of the perp when the crime was commited. So my question to you is this, how should the police look for the perpetrator of a crime after it happens?
Implant everyone with a GPS chip so everyone could be secure and happy, right?
What the ACLU doesn’t tell you is that half of those stops did not involve the police officer actually frisking the person. Whenever the police stop someone based on the criteria listed in the UF-250 (Stop, QUESTION and Frisk Form) the police have to fill the form out even if no frisk is conducted. It’s also important to note that a lot of cops were filling out the 250 after they made a lawful arrest for a crime that was in fact commited. Another number that the ACLU doesn’t tell you is that half of all those stopped, questioned and frisk had prior criminal records.
THis form is available to see online. Notice how the form asks wether the or not the person was actually frisked.
So do you agree that everyone should be implanted with a GPS chip so everyone could be secure and happy, right?
Sorry. I didn’t hear your tone of voice when you were “speaking”.
P.S. Numerous instances of improper capitalization and punctuation, contraction without an apostrophe, numerous misspellings, quotations not properly set off by quotation marks, and a superfluous appearance of the word “there”, all in this post alone.
“Plain” English, my ass.
I’m not going to entertain that ridiculous conversation.
@negative-zero
If the description thats put over the air entails a white guy in a polo shirt that just commited a crime, then damn right that person that matches the description will be stopped, questioned and possibly frisked.
Actually they do tell you that. Just from the “Data Highlights” on page 2:
Unrelated, but I also like this part:
“Furtive movement” is now my favorite phrase, and I will be incorporating it into my speech on a daily basis
@Phoenix Wright
Lol I’m sorry, but I lost it at “Suspicious bulge”. Now it makes sense why that white cop stopped me at Jamacia Center while I was running late for work.
The only time I saw cops there do anything is when they patrol for high school kids who are skipping class lol
NYPD reminds me of the days the Smash community would hop on SRK every other day and make a new thread trying to force their dumbass rule sets onto us.
NYPD is like:
No Running
No Power Walking
No Jogging
Slow Pace Only
or else Prison Destination