On the LG blocking: I was certainly surprised. With the UC gone, you’d figure they’d use it later in the game, when somebody might have game-breaking info. I think we might be able to guess what Azure’s LG might have said, anyway. They’re certainly confident, but it could just be to get us to come more on the people Azure fingered. Personally, the LG block has little bearing on my list of suspects.
*Glad someone else is thinking like me. I would like to see you speak up more since you generally seem to be helpful to the Civ cause.
Synonym is, in my mind, also quite helpful to the civ cause.
Pietastic is a tough read. *
I want to trust Pietastic but it’s awfully hard to right now. From the hype he received during the All Star voting I’d think he’d be a big help to the civs if he’s one of us. But if he’s corrupt we are in for a hard(er) game.
*Hmm maybe if I knew you I would have remembered such a point. But now that we’re on the topic how good is your memory? And can you link to the account you got banned on? Can you refer me to the name of the account? Did anyone here know you on your past account? And most importantly
@PimpWilly
Can I question someone who ISN’T in this game that knew Saitsu’s old account about how he used to be so I can verify his story? *
*Why? If you’re going to use researching prior thread activity to get down to why Azure was killed, why isn’t the last gasp a factor? Please take me into your thought process. *
Because so early in the game the chances that Azure’s Last Gasp contained information he did not already make us aware of is extremely low.
If anything, using the blocker like that was a rookie mistake.
http://forums.shoryuken.com/profile/18918/Saitsuofleaves
[/quote]
*Jesus Christ 5k worth of posts in 18 months to 2 years. *
You haven’t taken a look at my current account have you?
*Can you answer these last two questions?
I see you guys online right now, care to contribute any thoughts while I scan his old account.
*
Nothing worth mentioning, at the moment.
I’m reviewing the thread in hopes of making up my mind in who I’ll lynch.
Day 2 was when I lynched a civ in my first game, after all.
I’d rather not let that happen again.
*@Saitsu:
I still see you online and you haven’t answered the other 2 questions I proposed to you. Those two being how good your memory is and if anyone here knew your old account. *
My memory sucks. Sometimes I have great clarity, other times I forget where I left things I put down 3 seconds before hand.
As for anyone here who knows it, the hell if I know. Pimp Willy maybe, but as for the people playing the game, unlikely.
I left SRK open while I was at work and now I’m leaving to go home. I’ll have to give some input when I get in.
I’m con
[quote=“DarkGeneral, post:301, topic:164397”]
- We have 10 hours left roughly and I have shaky leads. I’m going to reread this thread again for the time being while reminding people about the worst possible outcomes. It goes without saying that if we nail a mafia member within the next two day phases we’ll be in a much better position. *
*Well that post ended up looking like shit with a piece of jesus toast. It was supposed to read:
I’m conflicted. We have 10 hours left roughly and I have shaky leads. I’m going to reread this thread again for the time being while reminding people about the worst possible outcomes. It goes without saying that if we nail a mafia member within the next two day phases we’ll be in a much better position.
Welp, I’m probably going to get lynched now.
*And this is how the rest of the post should have looked.
On the bright side, I get an unblockable last gasp. *
I’ll leave now,
In case my list was not able to clarify this,
My theme for today’s lynch are the ones whose reaction to BullDancer’s death left an impression on me,
Although Manx did move quickly to his next target(Godot) after BullDancer was revealed as the UC, his post did not struck me as odd. As I’ve previously stated, 70% in my list means someone who I’d lynched/consent to be lynched today. Manx falls into the latter, I do not want to lynch him as I’m not yet convinced he is mafia, but if others have their reasons why then so be it.
Neesa(65%), on the other hand, is someone who I’d like to scrutinize on the next phase depending on what happens later.
That leaves us with The Co-Jones, if you need my reasons, I’ve already stated it in my list.
You could have suggested and voted someone else if you thought BullDancer was a bad idea.
So for now,
Lynch The Co-Jones
If a compelling counter-argument comes up or a reason not to, hopefully, if I’m able to return in time, I would be able change my vote accordingly.
It’s not wasted. They knew they would get more stacks that very night. And, the theory I have (and have already stated) is that they did it to confuse us. They have no shortage of uses for it. As was stated earlier, our numbers is a much more potent weapon if used correctly, and what better way to get us to screw it up than to get us pointing fingers at each other. :tup:
I’ma go over your list again, Mobius.
I honestly don’t understand why what I’m saying is getting misconstrued. I asked for clarification. I wasn’t throwing him up on the chopping block like others right away. I don’t like jumping to conclusions. I play passively and carefully. So if that makes me some magical target, because I can’t give input like everyone else can, then, whatever.
I’ll read over past pages and see what I can attempt to contribute.
Ugh…I don’t feel confident enough to vote on anyone, but I also need sleep and probably won’t get much deliberation until it’s close to time.
So I’m going to do this…
No Lynch
In no way am I actually considering a No Lynch nor do I think anyone else should follow this. This is just a placeholder vote in the off-chance I don’t wake up in time.