I’ve already explained my reasoning. So far, I’ve nothing to add.
If everyone didn’t post so many incendiary posts then I wouldn’t have a great wall of text, so everyone shut up once in a while!..okay no more long posts as they’re very exhausting and ignored anyways, but if we lose I know who to blame.
Thanks to DG I’ve been able to mine a lot of info day 1 which usually never happens as day 1 is usually everyone being too scaed to pont a finger and then someone makes a random accusation and then we lynch inactives. Oh and +1 for Lumberg and -1 for Lumberg =P.
When’s PW/DG/pie?
When’s Pewdipie? What are you on Oz?
I tried to make one, but the site is screwing up for me. CST is jacked up, can’t find a proper time zone for me.
Oz, after last game you can be assured that I am reading everything you post carefully.
I’m not sold on the radical fuzz lynch but it would give us more information than someone like shinkuu.
I think we need to think day one through, but at the same time it is the opportune time to trim some of our lower contributing brethren out.
In summary, lol I can’t decide whether lynching inactive or a suspect would be better.
It took me a good 5 minutes to get that.
DG and PW are a package deal for me, straight out the gate their first posts read like a well calculated 1 2 mafia punch combo, but Pie just ignored all the holes of the protection plan and contradicted himself at least twice, so one of these 3 will be getting my vote today, and I’m not letting up on them anytime soon, for the reasons I posted above.
I hope I didn’t do all that for nothing
NOTE: Votes should be PM’d. Please make sure that if you are going to lock in, that you have PM’d your votes to me, or it will not count.
I’ve seen many votes here and scant few hit my inbox, but I’m not sure how much of this is posturing and how much is legit votes, so I just wanted to re-clarify my rule for voting.
That’s how you cut down the quotes.
Its also back to no more when’s anything.
LYNCH: MLPFANBOYMARTIAN
Looking at DG possibly. I got a weird idea about what he may be trying to do.
Also where is @Augustus?
OK, I’m rushing into prep so I can’t make a well thought out lunch choice. I’m voting for Fuzz to see where it gets us.
No idea when deadline is but no guarantees that I will have even 5 mins to myself in the next 12 hours
- I won’t quote your entire post OZ, but I’ll say this.
What makes RadicalFuzz lower than Pietastic, PimpWilly and myself? All four of us were propagators of the “witness protection program” tactic that I brought up. In fact RF took more part in the discussion than myself or Pimp Willy.
Also, do you really only suspect us 3 because of the discussion that it sparked on day 1? Would you had been more at ease had I threw out the humdrum “Let’s lynch a wallflower for day 1” and sat back reserved?
*Fluff suspicion comes from the first page where it looked like he tried to chide the Medic to come out and confirm he’d protect [SWB]. Well that and @Vynce thinking that Fluff is “due” to get picked as mafia.
As for the plan, if the consensus is that it’s too risky of a plan then we should move on. If it can be salvaged or refined to make it a better plan then I’am all ears. The only refinement I could think up is having [SWB] claim during cycle 2 if he survives today/tonight. IIRC, @MP confirmed in the sign up thread that [SWB] will get Kaz’s name night 3 even if [SWB] is killed that same night. *
Honestly, even though RF and I sniped a little bit, he’s not at the top of my list of suspects. Whatever people think of the protection racket, I think everyone can at least agree on one thing: if it’s a good plan, it’s not THAT good, and if it’s a bad plan, it’s not THAT bad. PW did the math, I walked through it, and it made sense to me. So, if RF were mafia, I don’t think he’d be arguing those points and my follow-ons with such great conviction. It strikes me as civ play. Could be what he wants me to think, but it certainly makes him less suspicious in my eyes.
Would I vote for if I had to do so right now? Either Oerba, whose early posts are tentative to the point where I think he’s trying to stay under the radar while all the flak flies, or OZ/WAH, since their posts are tough to decipher, meaning I couldn’t get a trace on their behavior.
@Oerba: what do you make of Augustus’s tentative support of the protection racket plan, coupled with his self-awareness that it will land him in hot water?
@orochizoolander: What do you think of GR questioning AC’s “not MP” statements?
@WTF-AKUMA-HAX: What do you think of Cyntalan and bloodymess?
*Deadline is at 9pm CST tonight. Which is 2 hours earlier than the usual time.
Also heads up to everyone, once the vote is pm’d it cannot be changed. I’m not going to be able to make it before the deadline tonight and I don’t know where I should place my vote. I have gotten a couple blips on my radar, with Fuzz’s page 1 slip up/phrasing being the biggest eyebrow raiser.
I’m still undecided on where my lynch is going but the Fuzz vote is looking tempting.
When are votes due?
9PM tonight, CST.
@DarkGeneral pie isn’t a proponent of your plan, he opposes it. And is that comment on Day 1 worth killing me over? If I am Mafia I’m bound to say something of that nature again. Either way contribution is required on my part to survive.
@kaz dat AV 
Don’t vote me off today. I’d rather we lynch Alpha, but I’ll settle for someone more obviously dirty like pie/BM/Oerba. I’ll quote why I think BM & Oerba are dirty in a minute.
*Not a proponent, but pushing discussion on the idea. Be it “for”, “against” or pointing out flaws and/or advantages.
As for if it’s worth killing you over, I can be a dick and say “Dangan game”. But I’m not that type of person. Which is why I’m still musing over putting my vote on you or somewhere else. If you’re mafia and get off the hook now I’m pretty sure you’ll try playing it cool from here on out and try wiping what happened on page 1 out of everyones memories.
wow
good argue
many defence
very point
such tegaf
Spoiler
http://24.media.tumblr.com/50e426d48c0daf81ad2d7741b920d552/tumblr_mr8j2ePISF1szim6vo1_400.jpg
http://weknowmemes.com/generator/uploads/generated/g1387565621757546118.jpg
Your reasoning of ‘don’t vote me today because I said so’ was compelling enough for me to want to change my vote. Unfortunately, it’s already locked in, so there’s nothing I can do.
I sent this line out on page 2, and asked Oerba how he would play the current situation if he were The Chief. Notice that in the same post I closed roles in <> symbols. BM assumed that I meant the role <The Chief> and responded to it claiming that I was role-fishing, as Mafia fished in the previous game, and Oerba still hasn’t responded to me at all even though he is caught up with the thread.
Consider this: As Mafia, you don’t want to answer someone’s question. How do you not answer it without speaking? Get someone else to call it stupid or make it look as though it implicates that person. My original post very clearly asks how Oerba would play the current situation if he were The Chief, but it was misinterpreted by bloodymess to implicate me. I know for a fact Oerba read my original post because he responded to most of it (didn’t answer my last question “Are you Mafia?”) but he chose not to respond to my second post.
To summarize, BM misinterpreted my post to Oerba in a manner that made me appear dirty. I feel this is something Oerba would tell his teammates as Mafia to do so he wouldn’t have to respond to it himself. Or we could just lynch Alpha.
How many votes do I have right now, 4/5? In a 30 player game, correct?
(Vynce if I die this is officially your fault so you better help get this wagon off my back)
Humor me for a cycle. I’ll openly discuss that page 1 post if you wanna talk about it some more.
What am I supposed to say, don’t vote me off today because reasons? I have no evidence I can point to that makes me appear innocent, nobody really does as of yet.