like i said, its just useless kid. you got nothing. you arguments are based off of emotion and not reality. the basis of your argument against me is misguided and incorrect. i have said multiple times, if you had read ANY of my posts, that i don’t support pedophiles. i don’t support beastiality. i do support freedom and i do support democracy. thats it. you’re an intellectual midget fighting a giant here, don’t bother. you have no concept of freedom or democracy or what they even mean. good night kid.
What kind of “harm” do you speak of if you diddnt mean rape?? = /
As opposed to you who don’t even know how to read nor write. You keep dodging the fact that you don’t even know what a pedophile is. Come on… you don’t even know how to spell it.
And don’t you give me any “language barrier” excuse. English isn’t my main either.
So if a 12 year old consents to having sex with a 30 year old I guess thats alright with you then.
Paedophiles and sexual predators groom and manipulate children to provide consent… verbal consent does not excuse/allow adult-child sexual contact. The law takes this into consideration, so that the manipulation and grooming of children that leads to a yes does not and should not equate to consent in the eyes of the law.
:lol: you’ve got to be kidding me.
sigh… it’s the to catch a predator thread all over again.
Truth. You’re charged by the country you take residence in. If you go to Japan, bang a 10 year old, come back to the US and the government finds out they can press charges.
Fact: You have an argument based on a false premise:
This is FALSE.
Comece um dicionário. Asshole.
A pedophile doesn’t necessary have an all objective to just f**k kids. Its all very situational. If they get a chance, they may do so. THis is what we call situational offenders, and sometimes those aren’t even pedophiles eventhough it seems related to pedophilia.
Now sexexperienced i think you started this thread, so you should read your article better. It says that about 80% of the public or so don’t really approve of this party anyways. And the vote is by the “PEOPLE.” So like we all expect, the vote will most likely not pass. The thing is it’s not illegal to be a pedophile. THere’s reason why the U.S have some laws that may violate the people basically, even if they may be criminals. Look back at Judicial history at “Miranda.” Or even now with racial violence from police. Trying to fuck off all the pedophiles and torture them is past/history (as far as we know publicly). In having a democratic govt., it would be hyprocritical to just kill off pedophiles for sake of safety. And plus killing off pedophiles, you don’t get rid of the main problem pedophilia. I mean if you kill off all the pedophiles as of today, a new pedophile would probably be born the next minute.
And plus if the Pedophile party even becomes legit and accepted, i don’t think their ever going to gain enough power to become a majority, or at least i hope. They are basically based on just little kids.
Having sex with a child is wrong, if the don’t want it.
I can understand thinking a young girl is attractive. Mostly cause I’m still a young man. But I know that when I’m older my affinity for young girls is going to become wrong, but I may grow out of it.
But if people in the Netherlands think it’s a good idea to have a relationship with a young girl then that’s ok I guess. As long as they are not raping the girl it shouldn’t be as taboo as people presume it to be.
By saying I personally like young girls I’m saying absolute youngest 14. I’m 17.
Shit…he’s right. Kill the kids! They look young, but they know what they’re doing!!
Ignorance is bliss…
If your afraid to get into sex scandals like MJackson and R.Kelly, you will. After high school and probably others too, i developed this radar kind of thing in my mind where i can tell which girls were minors (where i can avoid trouble). Basically when you get older, you would be more excited about older “girls.” Your just basically in atmosphere of high school kind of thing, and its still ok. I mean i think any guy would probably look at minor and in some way find a involuntary response of some form of attraction. The important thing is frowning upon your actions afterward.
that’s the spirit! PREEMPTIVE STRIKES ALL AROUND!
but is it really possible to reform a paedophile? is it possible to reform a homosexual? maybe the current popular forms of paedophilic reformation: “get ‘Scarlet Lettered’ on Dateline,” “go to jail and get raped,” or “get your balls ripped off,” are so nonsensical and cruel, that pedos have no where to turn to except their own group for support? remember: they like KIDS. the people that are fucking them up are ADULTS. is that going to stop them from liking KIDS who have done nothing to them? though i doubt hypocrits will ever see eye-to-eye with them, giving them a voice is the right thing to do, even in the face of opposition. hell, ESPECIALLY in the face of opposition. maybe some day some sort of “common ground” could be met, and peeps would stop playahatin’.
EDIT: i am not a pedo, but i am a pervert. hating someone else’s fetishes while having fetishes of my own would make me a hypocrite, so i am forced to side with them.
for realz. youtube search: moleh
Have I told you that I love you today?
Nope. That’s why you jail them. No matter who they are, no matter how hard they try, eventually, they’ll either look at kiddy porn or worse.
Nope. Nice job comparing the two, btw.
Those aren’t for reformation. Those are to inform parents that they need to keep their kids away from them. And really, which is more important? The kid’s safety, or their well-adjustedness in a community? And cruel? Sorry, but people who look at kiddy porn don’t really deserve kindness.
Let’s be realistic here, for once. They ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO KIDS. They have easy access to kids, and easy access to kiddy porn. Tell me, do you think that they’ve never, ever looked at kiddy porn? Answer honestly (though you’ll probably just dance around it.
What common ground is there? That they can have sex with some kids…but not others? That they can download government-regulated kiddy porn? Honestly, there is no common ground between being able to look at kiddy porn/having sex with little kids, and not being able to.
We all have some sort of fetish and things (parts of the body, especially) that we particularly like. I like boobs. Alot. (Not those like…crazy basketball-sized ones that are in Swedish porn sometimes, though…those are kind of gross). But the ladies with the big boobs that I like are knowingly, willingly and prepared to do porn. Taking a little kid, and undeniably forcing them into it for somebody’s enjoyment is wrong.
Beastiality is different from having sex with kids. First of all beasts are animals, they get treated like crap anyways, and we’ll eat em too. Also, they seem to enjoy a human’s penis in them. There’s absolutely no reason as to why it should be illegal because the bond between man and animal can go beyond best friends. Along with other sexual acts, incest should be legal. The only argument incest is that children will come out with a lot of genetic diseases. It is like these people have never heard of birth control.
Pedophiles are different because they can manipulate kids. Did you know 30% of kids in the USA have been sexually abused as a child, and are likely to do the same to them? If we can get them we can prevent sexual abuse!!! Same thing with terrorists, get them before they do anything. It worked with the japs in WWII, it’ll work in today’s world war. The war against terror!
Ok…I dunno if you were being serious there, Inverse but everything you said was frickin’ crazy.
What makes you think I’m not being serious?
angryliberal, have you ever called in on Limbaugh’s radio show before? If not, please do and give me the time and date.