I was doing it out of curiosity, I always wondered how could anyone do such a thing, so one day I decided to actually ask from the source itself. It isn’t a site where they exchange pictures or anything…it was a discussion forum and any illegal pics were quickly removed and that person was punishable by ban.
Why was this thread resurrected? I do not know, I didn’t entirely resurrect this thread.
Why do people on SRK believe that CONVICTED pedophiles who advocate the legalisation of pedophilia would never act on their pedophilic tendencies if this bill past?.. how would they know?.. lol. SRK is scary forum to post on.
having read the thread in it’s dramatic entirety, I basically agree with ‘liberal’, but I have to take issue with whoever posted this:
this would be 100% true if things existed in a vacuum with context. I don’t agree that people need to be jailed for feeling something, but nor do I agree that all things are simply equal. That’s just lazy reductionism. You pinch me, I break your teeth. It’s all the same man. Hitting is hitting.
They’re saying punish someone for doing a crime, not for merely thinking about or wanting to do the crime.
Just realized how old this thing was, damn, who opened this can up again. Personally, I don’t feel they’re unrelated at all. It’s a dangerous line for them, to them it’s ‘natural’ but the second they cross that tiny gap between thought and action we summon the dogs, personally. I don’t really have any sympathy for paedos, but what I’m not about is what ‘seemed’ to be an idea being tossed around earlier, that these dutch ‘politicians’ should be simply rounded up and arrested for being paedophiles, even though there isn’t conclusive evidence they’ve yet committed a crime. Due process, etc, all that.
we’re not assuming anything because that was not the argument from the start. From the fucking start it clearly states that these pedophiles have been convicted you fat fuck.
it’s so hard for some people to understand me and tspudlyff8fan views because you’re argument isnt even related to the topic at hand so why the fuck are you even stating an opinion if it has nothing to do with the topic?
Angryliberal is popular on SRK for some reason. however stupid his points of view are (which they often are) people will agree with him without investigating the facts. How can you say you agree with angrylibearl and not state why you agree with him. lol.
lol i agree with this bcuz it’s true, although you could insert any number of posters in for angryliberal…that said, i usually agree with him, altho not in this case.
Seriously, how drunk are you right now? Not only does your post not make sense at all (I hardly stated that I agreed with angryliberal etc), but your objection seems to stem from the fact that you don’t seem to be able to understand what I’m saying. You stated so yourself in a sentence which was something like a grammatical nightmare.
And really, “you fat fuck?” Is that your attempt to get me riled up? I don’t get it. That’s not even obnoxiously weak, it’s just weak. It’s sad.
Did your parents just die, or something? Seriously, I’m concerned for you.
Is it pedophilia if I recall having sex with young girls when I was a young boy? Tell me it’s not, my heart can’t take anymore surprises…OR MAYBE IT CAN! FREE HEALTHCARE BYATCH!
i think somebody is still waiting for a member to post “hells yeah, grass on the field play ball, no grass on the field, play in the mud” and celebrate their love of all things loli