Paedophile party to contest Dutch general election

Dude. Are you serious? You honestly think that there’s a number of people who has NEVER LOOKED AT PORN EVER, but advocate it’s legalization? Really, do you?

What the hell are you talking about? I can honestly say that I’ve never wanted to look at child pornography, or wanted somebody that young. And yeah, I do think that I’m a better person than a pedophile. I think YOU are a better person than a pedophile, too.

That’s an entirely seperate issue, I’m not talking about the hot little 15 year old jailbaits who sneak their way onto campus during a party and do your best friend so that he ends up getting 2 years probation for statutory and has to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life…::cough::

But yeah, 15 year olds who sleep around are something totally different than 7 year olds being forced to do porn. We all should agree on that.

And being a bigot is legal. Not that it’s a good thing, but it’s legal. That’s what those organizations are founded on/are emphatic on now. Almost everyone hates people, but we haven’t all killed somebody. We all HAVE, however, acted on our sexual desires. Be it in looking at porn or having sex.

Amazing I’ve seen the same spelling error so many times…it’s “pedophiles”, unless someone went back in time and changed it. I have nothing to add to the actual topic at this time…but that was getting to be almost as annoying as my fellow Memphians who will forever say milk as “murruk”.

Because not doing it would be punishing someone for their beliefs. Now, I do think that he should be made to attend regular treatment sessions and never be allowed to live or work around children but in the end we are all at the mercy of the next man’s inhibitions. We tell people not to harm others but ultimately, the choice is theirs. The only other option is for everyone to live in cages.

I do believe in a 2 strikes policy of some sort for convicted pedos.

lol…I’d like to see how this rating scale for being a “good person”, looks like. And what exactly decides it, in your opinion.

That isn’t the argument…I don’t think anyone here is saying that someone who is forcing ANYONE to do porn shouldn’t be convicted.

If I killed somone, served 25 years for it but still felt I had done nothing wrong plus admitted to the possibility of killing again, should I be released?

If you were Originally sentanced to 25 years, yes. Rehabilitation only applies to parole.

Now if you were given life and were up for parole, hell no.

There is no defined scale…I just think pedophiles. Or racists. Or murderers. Or rapists are bad people.

I know. I was just replying to when Jaldaboath said…

Maybe I’m mistaken but dont they assess criminals before they’re released in the US?

Parole or not he’d kill again so whats the difference.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/paedophile

It can be spelled one of two ways. Kinda like the word color (colour).

once again, you are pigeon holing people. i advocate the lowering of the age of consent to 16 and i’ve never done a 16 year old, nor do i have ANY desire to. i advocate the legalization of drugs and most the ones i believe should be legal, i’ve never touched in my life, nor do i have any intention of ever touching. there is a difference between a persons desire to change the laws to what they see as a reasonable level of acceptability and desire. you are too young to understand that. you live this life where desire must be directly linked to drive. its not always so. you can find that you feel the laws are unfair to others, not just yourself. everything you’ve said is so drenched with individual drive, what YOU think is right. hoepfully as you get older, you will learn to think out side that box, though given your overall level of open mindedness, i would say you will be stuck living in your little world. good luck with that, but don’t ask to be accepted by the people here who have more foresight than ‘i want it this way’.

The difference is that you can not tell a person that they commited “X” crime and deserve “X” amount of years for it. Then at the end of it, not let them out because “They did not learn their lesson”. You are essentially holding them for crimes they did not commit. In the eyes of the government, the time served attones for the past crimes so he is an innocent man at that point.

They assess criminals who up eligeible to be let out early. Not people who have served their entire sentences.

Wow…this thread was in interesting read, but I must say that a Minority Report-type of justice that some people are advocating is not a good idea. I don’t know about anyone else, but I do not like the idea of being guilty of something without even knowing it.

Have a nice day!

You’ve pretty much summed up my thoughts on this issue. Good work.

Not learning their lesson isnt the issue here, its the possibility of the crime being committed again. Thats how the law works in Europe.

Prison terms are rarely extended but it does happen.

sorry for taking so long to reply. sure castration works. on guys. what about the girl pedos? would we be so swift to cut off a kleptomanic’s arms, even if he gave the “OK” for it? that might not be the best example, but i think what i’m trying to say is that instead of mutilation, maybe we should try to find ways to do things better.

i’m pro drugs as well, but i’ve never done any.

Chemical castration doesnt stop the sex drive. They’d find other ways of molesting kids.

Death penalty is the only feasible solution.

God damn, I once frequented a Pedo site where the pedos themselves would tell about their experiences and their feelings on how people looked at them. One thing that struck me as a surprise was that, not only were men into the whole ordeal, but so were females too. There was a great amount of females also, who shared the same Pedophile feelings as the men did. I always looked at it as a thing with men.

There’s a question that I’m afraid to ask…

i’m not…so why exactly were you frequenting a pedo site?

and why exactly was this thread resurrected?

There are a LOT of women who enjoy the sexual company of young girls. It’s not just a man thing. As someone who spent years in the private business of helping the cops but the bad ones in the slammer, I know a fair bit about the nature of pedophilia and the people it effects.

  1. The vast majority of pedophiles will never act dangerously in a manner driven by their disorder (IE view child pornography, molest anyone).

  2. Child pornography consumers are fairly rarely dangerous. A lot of them look at it on the Internet once out of curiosity, then destroy it all. An example being my little brother, but hey, he was like 13, lol.

  3. The dangerous ones prefer to hide and wouldn’t form a party of this sort. It brings them into too much of the public eye.

In other words, these clowns are likely harmless as long as they don’t get to have their way. Their agenda is still possibly dangerous, though.