O.J Simpson has been granted parole - he'll be out by October (at the earliest)

What a shame. I feel for the family of his murder victims.

Absolutely not denying this. The case was pretty much handed to the prosecution on a silver platter but they fucked it up. Jury more than likely being extremely biased probably didnā€™t help. Only two jury members were white, the rest or majority were black. The jury deliberated for forty god damn minutes in a DOUBLE HOMICIDE CASE. Most of the jury probably already made up their mind on OJ being innocent the moment they realized it was him on trial; the evidence, although mishandled, probably did little to sway their minds. The whole thing was a shitshow. Incompetent prosecution. Conspiracy theory defense. Dumb ass jury.

Itā€™s less believable that he was able to dispose of all the evidence and be framed by such incompetent police. Itā€™s more believable that he was able to dispose of some evidence, but in his haste, made some mistakes such as the blood on and in the Bronco and the glove found at his home. Itā€™s hard to believe heā€™s a ā€œproā€ because he absolutely wasnā€™t one. All the evidence pointed to this, but the incompetent prosecution, Cochranā€™s black magic (pun intended), and very likely dumb/biased jury lead to him literally getting away with murder.

I remember the evidence. I would have let him off as well. Missing blood and a sock that was on the floor of his room perfectly presented with a single drop of blood on itā€¦ that soaked through the sock as if planted there.

Anyone in LA knows the police frame people, OJ got off because the police tried to frame a guilty man. And if they tried to fabricate evidence, thereā€™s no telling how much other evidence was also fabricated. Points to reasonable doubt.

Not saying I think heā€™s innocent, just that stranger things have happened.

For reals, I would imagine oj trying to kill someone would look like one of his naked gun skits

Christopher Darden, one of the lead prosecutors on the case, did an AMA, if you guys are interested.

You aint lying, them jayz oj memes was killing me earlier.

I remember the day of the announcement of his verdict my black teacher wheeling in the TV for all of us to watch, and her celebrating the verdict. Itā€™s funny now because I could also hear the ruckus in other classrooms of shock and disappointment down the hall.

Like what was echoed by a few in this thread, the trial wasnā€™t about guilt or innocence for black people. Most black women saw Nicole as a white hussie who stole a successful black man from ā€œthemā€ even though OJ was the one who chose her, and black men saw all the times they were treated as third-class citizens by ā€œThe Manā€ and mistreated by police, and wanted the rich and successful OJ to win on that principle alone. This only got exacerbated when that racist POS Mark Furhman all but admitted he planted evidence to stick it to OJ. Many white people could claim the moral and legal high ground because they blinded themselves to bigger picture and willfully ignored the underpinning social issues that warped the moral perceptions of so many of their black ā€œfriendsā€ of convenience and workmates.

Iā€™m still amazed by the Mind Gem-wielding Johnnie Cochran who somehow got OJ off with his ā€œGlove doesnā€™t fit, you must acquit defenseā€.

Hyper Combo Finish! KO!

Po, you forgot the biased ass jury too. Itā€™s still hard for me to grasp how the prosecution could fumble a case like this. I mean they had a clear path to the end zone.

Good post. Trying to provide some quotes from that AMA:

And then, this lovely quote:

I thought, though, that youā€™re unable to choose what you respond to and donā€™t respond to when you assert 5th amendment privilege. As in, you canā€™t plead the fifth to every question, then say ā€œNO!ā€ when they ask if you planted evidence. Is that true? Google seems to have different answers.

Did Fuhrman actually plant evidence or was he just trying to cover his ass no matter the possibility? Weā€™ll never know for sure. For all we know he was just doing everything he could to avoid being charged with perjury, but the reasoning didnā€™t matter. Like Darden said in the AMA, all that mattered was Fuhrman pleading the fifth was enough to make up the minds of the (already biased) jury.

The AMA is pretty great though. I havenā€™t read through all the questions he answered, but Darden is incredibly honest and answers some great questions. He notes that putting Fuhrman on the stand was the biggest mistake the prosecution made, despite knowing the fact that it could bite them in the ass.

Reading through the AMA, I noticed a comment that one of the jury members was a former Black Panther member. LOL. This whole trial was fucked from start to finish.

Itā€™s just so much dumb shit the prosecution did at that time, hard to keep track of. Itā€™s funny but itā€™s not funny.

We need one of these dudes on every jury XD

Wasnā€™t there a popular theory that his son could have done it & OJ covering?

Someone asks Darden in the AMA what his thoughts were on that theory. He says it was defamatory.

Itā€™s clear as day that OJ did it and Rob hid the evidence. He took it to he grave! Thatā€™s a real one right there RIP

Did it or not he wasnā€™t convicted of it. You canā€™t punish someone on what should have happened. Heā€™s in jail for armed robbery and heā€™s getting let out from armed robbery.

Everyone: Did you hear O.J. is getting out?

Me:

Umā€¦ What the fuck is that?