like i said earlier in this thread,…
dbz world tournament style bracket seeding selection.
ping pong balls with numbers in a box with a hole to dip your hand in it.
brackets already set up numerically. just dip your hand in the box, pull out a ball, show your number to everyone, thats your number. and you face whoever’s number is in the same bracket as yours when they pull out their ball.
and no one gets to switch or change it after the ping pong selections.
i.e. the seeding for the brackets are set in stone, 4ever.
and no waiting 1 hour for people to show up who are missing from their seats come gametime type nonsense either,…unless they are actually tied up playing in another game at the venue…and that shouldn’t take anything over 15 minutes, 35 minutes max to complete their match and head over to their next match where someone’s waiting patiently for them.
if you are waiting an hour or more, than your opponent is either irresponsibly late or screwing around outside the venue and there is no excuse for being forced to wait without good reason.
if they’re in the bathroom, or something malfunctioned with their controller, understandable,…they just have to inform the official and their opponent beforehand…of the cause of some degree of delay.
this is the only way people won’t complain and cry foul.
as to who gets to hold the box full of numbered ping pong balls…i nominate iShotto.
he plays no favorites since he hates everyone equally.
only honest man i know, aside from jesus.
If they were trying as hard, they would be playing better.
Whose to say they aren’t? Just because they haven’t cracked a top 8 or won a major?
Definitely not you
They’re both important. Why do you think the player suffers from seeding?
Though again I have to point out that we have a TOP PLAYER dictating his own matches. I realize that’s not seeding, but given the circumstance it’s not so insane when people say “fuck it just do random matchups” because the situation you’re talking about is really a wildly uncommon statistical anomaly.
Seeding may provide better results, however it’s express reason isn’t keeping a a schmuck from getting his hands on prize money. To point that out as the major reason for doing it just hampers your argument.
That was not the intent of my post. I’m saying no-names are generally going to be significantly less talented than the big names. There are exceptions, such as Gamerbee.
This is a good point. I think it just was an oversight from it being a long weekend. On a lighter note, there has never been a bracket that players have not complained about.
Players take priority, stream folk do NOT since well they aren’t playing. Tournament is for the players first since they came to support the thing in the first place. It’s not so much a case of players suffering, it’s just what’s wrong with having everyone on equal footing with random seeding. Why should player A get a perk.
everyone knows that all thats going to happen is Mr.Wiz is gonna tell justin to not say it at loud next time.
close thread
also, why did justin blow the semi’s?
Now I’m not disagreeing with you about a player having say in his tournament placement. That’s fucked up. I was responding to the mongoloids who believe seeding shouldn’t exist.
And yes, I know it’s a very rare chance of happening, which is why it’s a theoretical situation, but it could still happen.
I wonder how many player complaints have become brackets though.
Though we’re in a thread about a player who has a say in his tournament placement. So I think the argument for totally randomized brackets (i.e. ping pong balls with numbers on them) is more based on that than anything else. I mean some independent and verifiable random method of distribution has obvious pros which relate to this conversation.
No. Seeding just elevates the skill level of the top 8 in general. If the no-names are legitimately better than the seeded players, they will beat them, and it will be hype. It’s not like the seeded players go in a round up or something.
In a tournament with 4 pools, what happens if it gets arranged randomly and the best 25% of players get put in one pool with the worst 25% in another? A lot of good players go home with no money, and a lot of bad players make it to the finals to get beatdown in a lot of boring, lopsided matches they didn’t deserve to be in.
Yeah, in that case, you can get to top 8 and not be very good, which is why organizers of almost every major tournament imaginable at least take a few measures to make sure that that situation is avoided and everyone either has to go through a known good player or someone else good enough to have beaten one. I can’t believe this conversation is even happening.
Daigo losing to Andre, and Marn at SBR wasn’t hype ladies, and gentlemen.
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Are you even listening to yourself right now?
Boring to watch? I will literally downback for an entire grand finals if that nets me the win, why should ANYONE give a damn for the soulless stream monster brigade or the damned fanboys that came to the tournament?
Jesus fuck I can’t even believe you said that.
Stayed for Illuminati stories, was kinda disappointed
yeah I’ve never known Choi to do this. The guy works his ass off the entire weekend. He def deserves to play. And if he seeds himself, so be it. Just for the amount of work and effort into making the tournament happen is reason enough to validate himself being seeded. But I don’t think John is like that. He’s pretty humble. He’s one of the best in Norcal. So if he’s seeded I’m cool with it.
I’ll take your word for it. Ive just heard about so many shady things in the smash community, that I thought that kind of shady type of behavior runs rampant in their Tournaments. If that really doesn’t go on, than I would like to take a second and apologize to all the smash players.
Fuck Fivec, I’m gonna down back all night just to bore his bitch ass. Grab the popcorn slob, it’s gonna be a while.
Streams build and strengthen the community. Making them less hype hurts the community.
What’s wrong is that excellent players can be screwed by being randomly assigned to a loaded pool while mediocre ones can get a break by lucking out with a weak one. Now, depending on the payout structure, it might not matter a whole lot where in the brackets the lesser players get knocked out, but the worst case scenario is that all the killers are on one side of the bracket and all the scrubs are on the other side. Why not try to control for that kind of disaster?
Also, as I’ve said, I’m sure there are a lot of players who would not love being matched up against someone they play every day in the first round of the tournament. That’s not a stream-monster concern, it’s a player one.