Bravo lol! People defending this movie just boggles my mind. If this had another directors name on it people would not be giving it such a huge pass.
the reason the guy took off his helmet is because it makes sense to his character. he isn’t an astronaut, hell none of them are astronauts
his character is quite important. but I don’t think you’re intelligent enough to realise.
the world if flat huh? LETS ALL LAUGH AT THE GUY SAYING THE WORLD IS ROUND 
just because you think something is stupid it doesn’t mean it is stupid. maybe if you grew up as a man you would be able to decipher movies with more class
yuck, the hill billiness in this thread makes me dizzy :shake:
What was his great contribution to the story? Taking his helmet off like a dumbass, drinking his problems away (for no apparent reason), and asking that dumb broad to burn him alive for no fucking reason. Yeah good shit.
He’s a fucking scientist.
HE’S A FUCKING SCIENTIST.
And a bird goes tweet. Nice job, pointing out the pathetically obvious. The importance of each individual character, both what Scott thought of it in his head (e.g., “Let’s show him getting plastered for having his whole world turned upside down!”) and what actually played out on screen (e.g., “Why is this guy getting plastered over something that isn’t even actually a setback? Oh wait, it’s because we need to frame David asking the film’s only real compelling question. Fucking lame.”), is evident to me.
I’m pretty sure I put more analysis into five minutes of this movie than you’d put into the whole thing if you watched it thrice. I’m not talking shit there, either. The whole film was me thinking “what is Scott trying to say here?” It’s what made me appreciate David, the film’s best and arguably most important character. It’s what made me appreciate Charlize Theron’s character despite her being wholly useless other than “dissenting bitch because they need a dissenting bitch.” It’s what made me hate everyone else.
Don’t ask for class you’re unwilling to show. I was fairly polite until you decided you needed to “forgive” me for calling out your stupidity.
Yeah, if it answered a couple of questions and had some smarter writing (Alien Cobra scene…) there wouldn’t be near as much bitching. If we the audience just got some closure, some significant answers like WHAT WAS THE FUCKING SPACE JOCKEY’S MISSION that would’ve been something. And then maybe find out what created the Jockey’s or their motivation, why the cave drawings lead to that planet in particular. And then you set up a sequel that explores the Alien’s origins or the origins of the Jockey or maybe the Jockey’s needed the bio weapons to combat other alien races or avert some universe-ending event or something?
Ideas I’m pulling out of my ass are better than this movie.
erm, drinking… think about it please. that drinking scene and what evolves from it mirrors something
you’re obviously a sensationalist. you won’t get off davids dick. yes david is good character but your lack of insight is quite hidious.
please, if this film is so beneath you please explain to me the purpose of each character, also I would LOVE to hear your interpretation of INCEPTION. please if you’ve written anything show us, I want something to laugh at
This fucker is crying that they haven’t found a live specimen after a short expedition on their first day. Even though they found a ton of other crazy shit that would surely provide tons of information. Its the discovery of a lifetime but he’s moping around like a petulant child. This is just a bullshit setup to force the scene where David spikes his drink.
The purpose of most of the characters is to do something stupid and then die. That’s about it really.
This is the best on-the-sly slap in the face, anyone has ever smacked Capcom with.
Cheers, Ben. :tup:
taking off your helmet on an alien planet was the worst idea ever, absolutely the worst.
I’m not going to make arguments for you. If you have points to make, make them. And make them fucking airtight. PROTIP: you haven’t done it yet, so experiment.
my point is that you claim Prometheus is a bad film because that little brain of yours can’t help but watch a film as if watching a weekly TV drama.
this is the problem with this way of thinking.
give me a small analysis of this painting, if you can do that then I will have to admit you know what you’re talking about regarding Film
(look it up online if you want, but I want it in your own words)
Lol, the fuck does that painting have to do with the movie or specs’ point?
its bad
–8<---------------
erm? do you think maybe they’ve already discovered other alien species at this point? you’re watching it as if it’s set in 2015. 
I just don’t understand you guys
Visual analysis test. VISUAL, ANALYSIS, MOVIE, PICTURES
Again I’ll ask what does a visual have to do with a complaint about a non-visual aspect of the film? PSEUDOINTELLECTUAL, QUIT, NO POINT, … CHEESE
You haven’t refuted the point about taking the helmets off because you can’t. Nobody can. It was stupid.
Ya know the helmet shit doesn’t bug me much The fucking snake thing though, goddamn that was stupid but holy fuck Ki Shima you are stupid as fuck.
I wouldn’t say Prometheus is out and out bad but it’s made frustrating by some poor writing. If this will be resolved in the Director’s Cut is anyone’s guess.
But I’ll play your snob game though:
The painting would seem to suggest the bourgeois of the upper class reflected not in the mirror but in the barmaid’s grimace suggesting a fake smile. Notice how her face is the most defined of all the people which would also suggest that though she may be lower class, just a servant to the higher class, she is still a more remarkable reflection of humanity rather than the pale mannequin expressions of the other people in attendance. She seems to be aware of this, hence the grimace.
That picture left me mind fucked.
Oh, and I liked the movie, a lot. It was refreshing after all the stuff that’s been coming out lately. I don’t have an argument or point to prove was just reading these last post and then that damn picture…what?!
I don’t understand how you can claim something is stupid when you don’t know what technology they have, they didn’t explain why they were fine with taking their helmets off. where did shaw get the information that the cave painting was an invitation???
I asked specs to share his interpretation of Inception but he didn’t want to so I gave him something to play with instantly.
and trust me, a lot of the visuals contribute towards the context of the film. you guys are hung up on that helmet rubbish, im not talking about that, he said he hates the film. im trying to get him to going into more depth about why he hates it but he keeps talking about one or two parts of the film he thinks is stupid.
do you understand now? geezus
explain please :wonder: I love people like you who just drop a statement, how am I stupid as fuck?