I had to wait all day to get on a jury for…
wait for it
A case involving vaginas, lasers, and burrrrrns. So many pictures of a swollen and burned vagina. >__<
BECAUSE GENITAL WARTS ARE NASTY FOLKS. WRAP YOUR MOTHERFUCKING SHIT UP!
Fuuuuck dooooood.
I wasn’t even able to get in a room with the judges and lawyers to start creating a jury.
When I first got the summon I was like, “Imma tell these fools I look out for LA RAZA so any brownie in my case is gonna get theirs, be it freedom or da case.”
But after deferring it to today and thinking about it I really warmed up to the idea, even if I might have to see disgusting ass shit like burnt vagoos. But now my obligation has been fullfilled for the next 2 years.
I kinda want to trade places with you, not for the toasted coochies, just for those XP points.
I mean I literally waited to we were the last group of names to be called in to go somewhere. Then I was granted blessed favor to go on the bench. Then while being interviewed the lawyers sought me to to be fit to cast a fair verdict on burnt pussy case #69. This one cat got in trouble with the judge because he said he couldn’t give a fair verdict because he had a bias towards the girl because he has a “hero” complex. Everything stopped while the judge grilled this kid. He then was told to come back tomorrow to meet with the judge personally. If you are sitting on the bench DO NOT ACT THE FOOL. Judges work a ton and don’t have time for shenanigans ever.
It was fun getting to do it I won’t lie. This girl had gential warts that got so bad that she started getting laser surgery to burn those suckers off. Then one day after a surgery she “alleges” that a piece of her labia majora was missing. The doctors and hospital argued that that’s just how her vag always looked (she had a decent looking pussy when it wasn’t OBLITERATED) but she says it was always symmetrical. She talked about how it interfered with her sex life (but the defense pointed out how she still had time to make a baby) and how it’s numb like something is missing down there but I dunno. With no before pictures from before her numerous surgeries how can anybody honestly judge besides just he said/she said.
When it came time for us to deliberate we were all so burned out after 3 days of flaming vaginas and Bill Cosby (her OBGYN was black) and the hospital that we just wanted to get that shit over with. What it came down to was there malpractice involved (on the doctor or hospital’s part or both). We decided based on the evidence there wasn’t. We said no to the allegations and this girl didn’t get jack shit for her troubles. I mean I felt kind of bad. Struggle pudgy doughy white girl with her means-well black boyfriend/baby daddy. But I wasn’t about to own the heck out of this doctor’s career and the hospital.
Best part is after we gave out our verdict the judge came in to talk to us about the case and he told us that the hospital was going to settle it with a nice sum of cash. The judge wasn’t there to see all this however (his father, another judge, sat with all the lawyers at the time) because he would have pushed for lawyer and the plantiff to take a settlement. So like I said, she got NOTHING in the end but even more bills to pay.
Man we, the people, the jury. We had great running jokes. We said that the girl’s lawyer looked like Colombo and he moseyed and stumbled around the courtroom. Meanwhile the lawyers on the defense were slick. Shit was straight tv dude. I felt like everyone was there for our entertainment.
On one occasion I had my phone in my pocket and the alarm was set to go off at 9 and we were there at like 8. So fucking awkward. The security guard wave dashed over and snatched my shit out of my hand. I felt that whole court glaring at me. Keep your electronic shit off!
:tup:
I think everybody essentially “schooled” you in your ridiculous arguments so there is no need for name calling here. So, what would happen if a 14 year old consented, is there an injured party now? By your definition, possesion of child porn shouldn’t be a crime either, since there is no injured party, just some kids in the nude…
Hell, it’s a crime to sell unpasteurized milk in the province I live in, even to a guy who just wants to drink some really fresh milk!
It seems that this kid is pretty savvy, so I’d wager that since it’s Texas, she figured she’d have a better shot in litigation if she claimed "violation of religious beliefs."
The whole “mark of the beast” just makes it that much funnier…
The child was already harmed by the taking of the photographs.
Possession of said photographs is part and parcel of the photographs having been taken.
Because they never would have been taken were there no audience.
How in the fuck are people equivocating child rape and speed limit violations, up in here?
It is a bad look.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
I’m going to quote the original statement for emphasis once again here:
I’m not trying to state that going 10 over the speed limit is akin to such a horrible crime as child exploitation, but rather stating that by using Ryusuke’s argument one can get away with many things and deem it not a crime. Using his logic, you could argue that if the pictures were taken many years ago and the kid is long dead, than there is no injured party. Sure they are in his possesion, but there is no injured party.:looney:
What if the kid is fictional and made of ink and paper?
They isn’t really ANY harm if all they are doing is showing the act itself
and continuously glorifying the act of pedophilia through various mediums such as animation and hilarious gag props.
The thing is, the victim is implicit in the intent.
Semantics matter, sometimes, is all.
I will agree that Ryusuke ought to have been more precise in his language, to shore up any and all terms, but I think his intent was rather clear.
re:
Attempted murderer: “I want kill x. I have a premeditated intent to kill x. If no one stops me, I shall kill x.”
Speeder: “I wanna go fast!” ~ Ricky Bobby
^^^^^
(irrc, she WAS over 18 
)
I truly believe that intent matters.
Manslaughter vs murder, and all that.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
The thing is… They only care about attendance cause they’re getting money for each time a child ATTENDS school. Higher attendance rate, more $$$$. There is nothing here about wanting children to attend school to help better their future (which doesn’t matter much, because the future of the child rests heavily on the student’s will to do more). We had to use ID cards in high school for… maybe extra curricular activities like school dances and shit, but that’s it. If we weren’t there, they called home and left a voicemail/spoke with whoever to inform them that their child wasn’t there. No RFID tags or other dumb shit to track you. I would’ve been an asshole and just left it somewhere.
Google tracks me enough as is.
Girl (Guy? I thought it said Maria, whatever) needs to just wear her (his?) stupid tag, graduate in 4 years and then use all your religion skills to get a useless philosophy degree.
It’s not like they put a chip in her (his) brain. It’s a fucking lanyard.
Real Anal Smell? WTF? 
Problem with just “letting them wear it, it’s just for 4 years” is that… Does it really stop there? You give people an inch and they run a mile into a fuckin’ brick wall, creating a major Fuckstorm. This is ‘Merica we’re talkin’ about.
Who cares about the future generations. They are all hoodlums anyway.
Yeah, the public sucks…I live amongst the primitive.
Yeah but they can’t think like that because the schools make sure they don’t learn history and can’t read well enough to learn it on their own. Even worse, they have no desire to read or learn. And this is public school. You people who think teacher’s unions are ruining education, imagine how bad it will be when these charter schools/religious indoctrination centers get even more popular.