Well this thread seems much more enjoyable, but a little random. IMO the only real agreeable way to rank ‘tiers’ is to calcuate every match in the game, and see who wins the most. There is a lot of debate about who ‘can’ beat who, but i think we’re missing some things. Sure i can beat generic blanka with Ryu most of the time, but he doesn’t win that match. The question is with two well informed players playing a long set of games what characters will fare better… i only have a couple things to start this with:
Sagat/Blanka would most likely be the only ‘top’ tier characters. There are many characters that do well, but sagat/blanka dominate more matches than the other characters (8-2 or better), the 2nd tiers win them but not as convincingly.
Blanka would probably be #1, IMO he only loses to vega (claw), and has toss ups with bison/sagat. People are saying geese, but I would have to see it with tournament level (i’m only pressing the buttons i need to, and if you whiff a move from half screen i get a free super, and if you don’t i get to RC you to death) blanka.
I see how rock can compete, but IMO he has to take way too many chances to do so, playing vs blanka is like playing as strider in MvC2, on paper strider is top tier vs everyone, but in reality you have to work too much, and when you guess wrong, you die for free.