For probably the 10th time on this thread ill have to repeat this same point again that apologetics just seem insistent on ignoring. Since the inception of feminism, we can see observable ideas, theories and activism efforts that have informed the movement as a whole. You can cite a million or a billion unique variations but when the organized collective efforts all settle on the same consistent points, the same consistent activism and the same consistent theories throughout the course of 50 years…individual interpretations matter naught. It may be the case that not every self styled feminis will think like Andrea but it doesn’t change the fact that when it concerns their views on gender and men and women in society…the differences cease to exist.
The ideological thread that binds feminism theology is what “feminism truly is"and its a ideology which feminist themselves have happily defined for decades. if your curious over what this “ideological thread” is then I refer you back to my 2 previous videos which give perfectly fair and objective definitions that you can either agree on, or disagree on and explain their flaws like I’ve been asking for the last 2 pages. The problem with you is that you ignore the questions, ignore the obvious and ignore the examples because you seem to think that since it doesn’t speak to your personal feelings on it that it somehow makes those examples or the evidence less valid. It’s like a Christian saying” the bible isn’t anti-gay because I personally am ok with gays and I personally don’t hold signs saying God hates fags". In short you cling to the commonly applied fallacy of the NAFALT(not all feminist are like that).
To that end, you can’t exactly cite these feminist as extreme examples because most of these women are prominently featured feminist who are openly admired and adored by the so called " different feminist". As that video from John the other pointed out, if a branch of feminism exist that is attempting to openly challenge and reverse the changes and causes the misandric feminist have inflicted…then plz point these feminist out to me and where I can join them.
And match, I’ve been more then generous with allowing you to dismiss the evidence presented here as “extreme outliner behaviour” but c’'mom babe…I even said patriarchy theory was the core principle all feminist believe in and you just admitted to that premise in your first response on this page.
Are you gonna slip soon with all these mental gymnastics?
I’m not responding to your points because I have nothing to prove to you. I’ve said my piece. I’ve said what feminism is to me and that’s what guides my actions. Maybe it would just be easier for you to not define me as a feminist? I’m ok with that, it’s your interpretation and definition.
I would say that I don’t feel that I’m a misandric feminist. So join me? I feel my more serious comments on this site can back that up pretty well. I’ll admit though I do have my fun from time to time. Like if I told I’m only here on SRK to gather information to justify the cleansing of the male populace with castrations when the feminist revolution takes control I’d hope you didn’t take that seriously. Cause there’s only a very slight chance that it might be true.
I have to wonder though, what exactly is your goal in all this? To prove that feminism is bad? I only ask because it seems you have difficulty when others see things differently than you. For example, I disagree with how you define feminism, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to demand you prove anything.
Why should anyone care that you’re not “like that?” You and every white piece of shit posting in this thread are literally the stream monsters of feminism. What you do is meaningless and what you say follows. What matters are the feminists DOING things that negatively effect others across the country. You know the ones you ignorantly support in name for feel good vibes? You are the straw feminist, the made up picture of the “good” feminist that plays on the biases of all that is white and female.
Hey guys, I’m a Ku Klux Klan member. I don’t hate black people, I’m not like those “extremists.” I’m just part of the group because it’s a nice way to meet people!
I’m a therapist intern at a home for women suffering from domestic violence and substance recovery (did you know about 1 in 3 Native American women are abused? Yeah, I stay busy). A big part of my treatment plan involves helping my clients form positive relationships with men.
Also, I’ve actively pushed for funding for men’s homes for domestic violence. That’s going to be a tough one, but I feel it’s necessary. Men suffer from domestic violence as well, but it’s rarely addressed and treated.
I DO these things because I feel that they are the ethical thing to do. Don’t assume everyone is just sitting around twiddling their thumbs when it comes to gender issues.
The difference is that I’ve been willing to justify my definition, offered evidence for my opinion and challenged people to prove me wrong or show me the error of my ways. You’ve been at this for a whole page and so far you’ve only deflected the argument by citing a personal individual reason for not acknowledging my points…I’ve yet to see how my arguments against feminism are not valid or legitimate from a purely objective, factual perspective. To use the religious anology again, your telling me the bible isn’t anti-gay because you don’t personally have a problem with gays and I’m asking you to give reasons outside your own person assurance.
I’ll say it once again, you know my argument and you know the evidence I bring…if you don’t wanna tell me how I’m wrong or prove those vids wrong then…well that’s on you. I’m not gonna go in circles forever so I’ll just leave it at that, the chanllenge is open for anyone who wants to prove me wrong.
I think angelpalm is right. Lets say for example the NAACP started saying arbitrarily that the game industry is racist then threads about that would pop up too. I do respect the fact that you’re being civil and haven’t said the “Ya’ll are bitter virgins/losers” card.
Word, and it is just on such a wide fucking scale that this being done that it couldn’t be viewed as anything but some crazed puritan censorship nonsense from the 1800’s which is funny since these brand new ass broads think they are on some serious groundbreaking level.
Fuck outta here.
Even as bad as the NAACP is these days, what with being bought out by corporations and whatnot atleast they wouldn’t waste their time attacking something so stupid. They actually focus on REAL issues that affect REAL people, not virtual worlds being played by hormonal adolescents.
Yeah, and though the NAACP is named the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, they have raised piss and vinegar about every issue under the sun(including immigration, women’s rights and LGBT rights, though not anything substantive for black people, like economic empowerment, despite being the “National Association for the Advancement of Colored People”)
