I’ll address what I can, but I’m afraid after this I will not be able to reply for the rest of the day so I apologize if I miss someone’s post or misconstrue their points. I hate huge posts too, but it’s a necessary evil in this case. Anyway:
Indeed it does, to what extent is our disagreement but lets leave that for now. How does this statement translate to what you said about risk? There are other big devs around (big enough to possibly sell games or at least draw interest with name alone) with a lot of properties that can be translated to fighting games. Despite SF4’s obvious success, no one seems to be taking this route. The reason presented is risk, but how does that correlate if a name is indeed enough to push games? My own view, that I mentioned in my first post in the thread, is that they do not explore fighters because they do not understand fighting games. It’s not a niche genre, it’s a genre with a lot of possible popular appeal, but actually making these games requires an understanding and expertise that most of the big names do not possess. That is my reasoning, but like I said before, I am not satisfied with it entirely.
Ostracized by trolls and attention-seeking posters perhaps. Why should these get any attention? I don’t recall seeing the actual threads for the games being crapped up with talk about how they are terrible. Even when it comes to games like Melty Blood and Arcana Heart which have an aesthetic that some people find distasteful, the negativity is essentially just trolling. This should not have any impact on the content of merit that still stems from SRK. No matter how much BlazBlue and Melty Blood are called bad, they were still at Evo. That does not seem to me to be consistent with segregation. It is welcoming in practice and the evidence for that abounds. One of the best places to confirm this is the SRK wiki, which is a treasure trove of knowledge about games you might not expect.
A part of it can perhaps also be attributed to the general trend for cliques to be exclusionary. Since Tekken, Soul Calibur and KoF had/have places of their own, it’s understandable that some animosity would develop between dumb people.
Even if you disagree with me as to whether this occurred before or not, I don’t think it would be unreasonable to admit that it’s going in a positive direction now right? Look at some of the games featured on the front page for instance.
I would agree with this if I did not think there was a large enough number of people interested in fighting games for their own sake, without being very hardcore. I further believe that SF4 has bolstered those ranks.
I agree completely.
How ironic then that the poster you are quoting is not American? I mean, ignoring your actual point, you’re being guilty of the exact same thing you are accusing him of: poor assumptions and a lack of objectivity (the post is insightful though).