Scrub = arrogant player that doesnt want to learn, who also thinks tactics that beat them are spam or cheap, thinks that there is a right way to play the game and its the way that they play, complains loudly to the effect of the aforementioned when they lose.
That, is what the classic definition is… Well its more like, arrogant player that doesnt want to learn, but instead wants to complain about why they lost…
The thing to note is that ALL of those things in the first paragraph need to be present in order to call someone a scrub.
And by and large, the one that is most indicative of scrubdom is not wanting to put in the time to get better.
In here, incorrectly, people are saying that complaining is what is the most indicative of being a scrub… In the classic scenario it simply isnt true.
I posit that anyone who is fine with losing is just that… A loser. You dont become a winner by losing and saying hey that was awesome. You become better by using that loss as motivation to get better… Which is what the quintessential scrub is lacking. You can be the sorest loser on the planet and not be a scrub cause you may go home and practice for hours and hours to get better and beat what you lost to.
The word scrub nowadays is mostly used by the younger generation to describe a sore loser, that makes them feel bad for winning, by complaining, and funnily enough it outs the person using the word scrub, as a sore winner if they think that their play was so flawless to not be able to be critqued negatively.
In the end scrub is a word losers use to describe other losers, which is why i stopped using the term to describe people a long time ago, i prefer describing certain tactics as scrubby… Like doing a bunch of dps in a row in sf4 with no meter to cancel… Or mashing crouchtech with no timing, or jumping alot with no set strategy in mind…
Scrubby shit is easy to beat though, except for divekicks, which is why i no longer play sf4… Tired of dealing with divekicks of one sort or another.
-dime