See, that’s why I call it into question. Our natural aversion to incest is based on the instinct to procreate outside our peer group, which is nature’s way of discouraging inbreeding. It’s not foolproof, but odds are that sowing your wild oats far afield of the people of your own age group that you grew up with will steer you clear of the nasty issues associated with protracted breeding within your own gene pool.
This opens up the possibility of the occasional error (such as in the example you cite) wherein one does not avoid a member of one’s peer group because one is not aware that that person is a member of the peer group. The person has spent too long outside the community and has, as far as natural instinct is concerned, become no different from a stranger. But nature’s little system works well enough that even if the occasional inbreeding couple occurs, it’s usually just for one generation–an anomaly in the otherwise consistent trend. The offspring will usually carry out the program, assuming that they’re not contained within a closed community in which the options are severely limited.
And for the most part that’s good enough. The system doesn’t have to be foolproof, because the biological issues that are commonly associated with inbreeding only become probable after it’s been going on for a few consecutive generations. That’s when shit starts to break down. If things rarely get to that point, then all is hunky-dory as far as nature is concerned. The one purpose of the instinct is to keep those defect-causing gremlins from taking hold in the gene pool, and–even given the occasional accidental incest couple–that’s exactly what it does.
So if we go with a purely academic definition and define incest as two blood relatives doing the nasty in any scenario, then sure, it’s incest. But if we go with a more practical, purpose-driven definition and define incest as an activity that has a significant chance of causing enough harm that nature sees fit to safeguard us against it, then the occasional coupling of unknowing strangers doesn’t really count. And given that our entire aversion to incest stems from the latter definition in the first place, perhaps that’s the one we ought to be adopting.
There. Now watch half of the SRKGD members try to fuck their cousins.
This reminds me of a system the Israelite have in Israel, where kids are raised together, and even though they know they aren’t related, the don’t often marry one another.
Which reminds of this one time my cousins came down from Chicago, of which I have never met in my life, and one of them was wearing this ridicoulous short short where the thigh and ass cheek meet.
I was never so confused, luckily, I got over it real quick over the course of one day.
As for non blood cousin that’s only related through some silly ceromony? Why not. Im not related in any way.
ok, well you were all waiting for my input, so here’s what I have to say:
My uncle is holding a gun to my head,
and then he says "SAY IT YOU FILTHY KAFIR; SAY GOD IS GREAT!"
And then I will yell "ALLAH ACKBAR."
Then my uncle sticks it in my pooper
It will be @6:00pm, in the entrance of Best Buy, with Sheepskin condoms.
I mean as long they aren’t producing children then I have no beef with an incest relationship blood or not blood.
That being said I still cannot tell if the OP was serious or not.
-Cute, twin tailed little sister with an emotional disorder
-7:56 pm
-On her bedroom floor which happens to be strewn with video game cables and peripherals, bits of bedding, stuffed animals and softcore pornography.
-No, but a mutual interest in anal play will be expressed.
Shit my friend told me that he fucked his cousin inside a dumpster in back of a pizzahut at 2 am. I don’t think shit gets weirder that since he`s gay and all.
