Any reason you’d want the c3 instead of the u3 (assuming any lag would be the same)? Just curious. The difference seems to be the price and 720 vs 1080?
edit: oh and c3 is listed (on amazon) as just LCD, and u3 is listed as IPS Alpha LCD.
I know their track record is bad but that is under normal circumstances. I haven’t heard much about how they perform with HD Fury. Frankly I haven’t heard much about how any TVs perform with HD Fury. From what the opening post said many TVs don’t lag through their VGA port and the HD Fury allows you to play through that.
So again if anyone has tested HDTVs that lag normally with HD Fury and have had good results care to share the info?
I hear that’s a misnomer, also while I’m at it I was wondering about splitters, I so far need to get splitters for HDMI and (MAYBE) VGA (depending on if this HDFury thing reduces lag on my set. 47LD450 by the way.
can you somehow do the test with a CRT? i wouldnt trust it off a laptop.
Also about the HD Fury, i have a Sony Bravia 32 inch, it lags just as hard through the VGA port as it does through the HDMI, at native resolution (32-35 ms lag). I wouldnt just buy a Fury before testing your VGA port with some cheaper product first.
does anyone know about the smaller asus monitors? I like the vh236 but 23-24" is a little bit big for my small room so I’d like a 19-20inch monitor for a dual setup.
Are the VH series (considering the vh236h in mind) pretty comparable to each other with differing screen sizes? I know some of the newer ones use LED lighting but I guessing the changes to input lag is negligible. Any response is greatly appreciated!
That’d be to test the CRT synced with the LCD and or laptop, depending upon your testing method.
Dammit, I friggin’ wish I hadn’t sent my Evo monitor on ahead of me, prior to the move… this would have been done in half a second if I had it here, still. :\