does the Asus VH236H comes with headphone jack?
from looking at newegg, it does seem to have headphone jack along with audio in jack. I could be wrong though.
Yep. Comes with both audio in and headphone jack to confirm what the poster above said.
cmon guys im a noob when it comes tho this stuff, and i need someone’s opinion
WorstGiefEver did a lag test of a VW246H
[media=youtube]ll5pIQwTWvs[/media]
Not sure if his test method is accurate enough for most folks here tho
i tried to find the VW246H, but its sold out everywhere, so any opinion on the 3 i have here?
Looks interesting. They are saying about a frame of lag. Hope somebody does the official test soon on it. Plus it’s 27in.
I’m in the same position as you. Looking for a “lagless” 24inch. Problem is most of the definitive tested ones are just not available anymore like you said just like the Asus VW246H.
I really think I’m just going to just bite the bullet and get the Evo monitor while its still available though i wanted a slightly bigger screen.
But if your willing, my advice would be to purchase one of those monitors from a place with a good return policy, buy a few video splitters from monoprice, and whip out your old crt and test.
I have the SMTT and have used it countless times. It really is far more accurate than the FlatpanelsHD or Lagom stopwatch timers. It will not give you as big of a range as the other two will, your numbers will be a lot more consistent. It can also count by the millisecond not by the frame like the other two.
Can you share? What version do you have?
I also wondered how exactly you interpret the results.
I think a lot of people read the results wrong and take the top number or match numbers that are the same hight but that is incorrect. The way to do it is compare the two numbers of highest/greatest value from each screen, and that is your lag. I will try to get a picture up soon to help explain.
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/8117/2409vscrt009.jpg
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4646/2409vscrt006.jpg
http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/6614/2409vscrt004.jpg
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/1702/2409vscrt003.jpg
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/5461/154esj.jpg
In the first image on the right you see the CRT just changed the top of screen to 61.321 that is the most recent time. Now on the left LCD second line from the bottom you see 61.318 then on the next line you see 61.321 starting to change, that is the LCD’s most recent time. This is showing that the LCD has essentially zero input lag. When the CRT count changes the LCD does also, the blurry changing number is because of the LCD’s pixel response time.
Second picture 57.862 is highest for CRT. Line 4 on LCD is 57.862 and line 5 is even starting to change from 57.844 to 57.865 just as the CRT is starting to refresh its next line at the top. = zero lag
Third picture is 46.016, line 6 on LCD and line 7 is starting to change, just as CRT is starting to change. again zero lag.
Fourth picture CRT is changing to 44.871. Last line of LCD is also changing. Again zero lag
Last picture is the LCD (lagless) against 67" Samsung. Line 4 on LCD is 79.510 its highest number and last line for the Samsung is 79.498 its highest number. Giving the Samsung 12ms of lag.
I hope this explains how to interpret the results.
Just as a heads up, for anyone thinking of buying a Toshiba Regza, don’t do it.
I bought the 46UL605U, 46" LED LCD TV a while back for a Black Friday blowout sale, and while it is one damn sexy looking TV, the input lag on the Component cables (haven’t tried HDMI as I don’t have one) easily exceeds 100 ms while not in Game Mode and is probably near 50 ms with Game Mode on.
I don’t have a great testing method right now to see the exact input lag, and I don’t have the Rock Band 2 guitar so I couldn’t do an automatic calibration. However, Rock Band is playable if I set Game Mode on, and set the calibration to 50ms audio and video. It’s not perfect but is almost right, which is what leads me to believe the input lag is near 50 ms.
Street Fighter is pretty much unplayable on this TV, which makes me very, very sad.
Got tired of looking for how much input lag the HD Box Pro adds so I went ahead and got one and tested it myself. Thought I would share the results with everyone. I used my Wii, split the component signal to a my zero lag LCD and used HD Box with it. Then the other signal to a CRT. Here are a few pictures of the LCD lagging the CRT because of the HD Box. You can check my earlier post to see that my LCD is zero lag.
[IMG]http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9516/420qt.th.jpg Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/8121/408p.th.jpg Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img641.imageshack.us/img641/3918/387j.th.jpg
26ms is the average lag I came up with over many pictures, top was 49ms.
Has this screen been tested.
Asus VH232H
Isn’t that the monitor used at EVO 2k9? If so, that monitor is tested and confirmed to be virtually lagless.
Why do I feel like the EVO monitor was VH236H for some reason…?
EDIT: I was right, it was 236. I assume the 232 is not much different, but if you want to be safe just go with the 236.
I wish I could go with the 236 but they are really hard to come by where I am from. Is there anyone who can confirm that the Asus VH232H is pretty much lagless?
Dude. You not lying about Toshiba’s. Well, cant vouch for an entire manufacturer but I tested mine (TOSHIBA 40RV525U) and it has a whopping 3-4 frames lag even with game mode on. To make things worse i even tested the VGA port using a splitter from monoprice. The VGA port was like 30ms. wtf?
Once i get a hold of the SMTT tool, might get a more accurate test but so far…shameful
Should be put in OP. But then again, i don’t even know if the OPer still exists.
The 40" Sharp LED-Backlight LCD LC40LE821E has reportedly only 19ms input lag in GAME mode.
LCD/LED TV Console Gaming Input Lag list/chart - AVForums.com
Tempted to get the 46" version LC46LE821E since Sharp panels seem to generally have low input lag.
No 50" TV with low input lag so far.