@“Lord Vega”:
And you really believe that this anime is supposed to play after Akuma attacked Bison? You really think that, with the atmosphere presented in that anime, the endings of SF2 still happened?
So, according to your logic: The final battle was about to happen. Akuma appeared and attacked Bison with the Shun Goku Satsu. Bison was unconscious and Akuma left, assuming Bison to be dead. Then Bison got up again and the five fighters confronted him and the scenes from the anime trailer happened.
You think that’s the intention? Really?
In the same way Scorpion’s classic costume in the new “Mortal Kombat” pays homage to a canon event from the old “Mortal Kombat” which is not canon anymore in the new continuity.
Except they altered the events either way. Even if we assume that Akuma attacking Bison still happened, the trailer still retcons everything:
Old:
Guile: "Hey Bison, remember me? Me and Charlie?"
Bison: "I remember, Guile. You’re not the runt you were then. Go ahead, kill me quickly."
Jane: “Honey stop. Killing Bison won’t bring Charlie back.”
New:
Guile: "Bison, if you surrender now, I assure you fair judgment."
Bison: “Don’t be presumptious. I won’t allow you to touch me. I won’t allow any of you to lay a single finger on me.”
<Boom!>
Now, try to reconcile this. Do you still believe that the anime trailer is supposed to seamlessly fit into the events of SF2, being the natural continuation?
Even if we assume that Guile’s ending never came to pass because Akuma attacked Bison before Guile had the chance to say the stuff from the game, the way Bison acts in both scenes is totally different.
So, if one fighter had defeated him in a formal battle, he would have been all: “I’m at your mercy. If you want to kill me, make it quick.” But after being attacked by five people, he is: “Ha, you can never defeat me. So long, suckers!”
As far as I remember, the last time you wanted to find out whether you could shed some light on the artwork by looking up an interview. Then you didn’t name me whether you found something useful, so I assume the interview didn’t mention this artwork at all.
So, can you provide an argument why Ryu was not the canon tournament winner that is not disproven in my essay? (I’m pretty sure the essay covers whatever arguments you brought back then.)
http://www.denny-r-walter.de/sf2-winner.html
Alternately, can you find a flaw in my argumentation?
Because there are five fighters attacking M. Bison, so there was most likely not a formal final battle.
Of course not. Why should they mention anything that didn’t happen anymore?
Do you remember Capcom mentioning that they retconned a good bunch of SFA3 by making Charlie’s SFA2 ending his canon “death” scene? No, they didn’t.
People had to analyze the SF4 intros and endings to come to the conclusion that Charlie’s death scene is the one from SFA2. And many people tried to deny it, believing that Guile’s SFA3 ending is still in effect and that Chalie falling down head over heels in Guile’s scene was just symbolic or whatever.
Then came SF5 and it was shown without a doubt what was already alluded to in SF4: That Charlie’s SFA2 ending is the canon one now.
But did they tell you this when SF4 came out? Did they say: “Listen, SFA3 has been retconned. When Guile speaks about Charlie still being alive, he’s not talking about the fact that he believes Charlie survived an explosion at Bison’s base. He’s talking about Charlie falling down a waterfall”?
No, they didn’t. They presented their anime scenes and you had to figure it out yourself.
Likewise, you have a post-SF2 anime that shows the final battle against Bison in a totally different manner than what we’ve known from SF2. Just like always: Capcom gives us the scene, but no further explanation.
And you still think the whole Akuma stuff, which would be a totally stupid Big Lipped Alligator Moment in this case (unlike in the original game where this action actually defeated Bison and ended the story) is still supposed to be there until Capcom explicitly says: “Akuma attacking Bison at the SF2 tournament is not canon anymore”?