that was the wrong way to do it, but ill give him props for having balls to get that close. If i was the old man rock,trust me, he would have been shot on the spot.
proof we don’t really need money?
I don’t think we really need any more proof of that than we already have, but it’s interesting to see a contemporary example of moneyless economics in action.
kinda of like how his family funded Hitler… yeah shot on the spot indeed… in a shallow grave
Fuck, his family funded alot of bad shit, and probably a few things worse than the big H.
I don’t know why but I’m still surprised how close he got to Big R
Not to mention how long he was able to yell at him
I figured there’d be at least 10 snipers trained on the dude, and he would have been dead the second he started to speak. o_O
Show me where that shit will get you a new phone (not some 500 dollar shit, just something under 100 with a plan), pay your utility bill, or a new ps3 game, and I’ll be all for it.
According to the Zeitgeist guys…
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ancestry-com-reveals-mitt-romneys-130000860.html
And they had a problem with the Kennedy’s but this ^ is ok, WTFever.
cus the Kennedy’s are ‘American royalty’, and Romney’s are nobody. 
EDIT: And all the presidents are related? No sheiiiit.
I’ve long touted a bartering economies drive for the creation of new capital. No one innovates like the people working for trade.
Not just our presidents. The bush’s and the english royal family are kinfolk. makes you think…
Keping it in the family… TO THE EXTREEEEEMMMEEE!!!
But when you mention the 13 bloodlines to people your a “conspiracy theorist”
Yeah I was surprised by this too. My first thought was “body double”.
Now youre being loco
[media=youtube]HLaR6BgpJ7E[/media]
you should have posted about it in a thread about Illumin-ahhhh-ti, with some Tupac songs playing