AV surely has to be Superboy Prime
null
@alphacommando Oh, I realize that.
I don’t agree with anyone trying to guide power roles in the first place. Who can they trust?
It’s less ‘guiding’ and more ‘reduction/prevention of wasted assets’. As for trust, that’s why I suggested a systematic list that can’t have been manipulated by a Corrupt.
@AlphaCommando
@DarkGeneral
@ForgeDigger
That wasn’t a RC back there, so you’re aware. I mean, you can do whatever you like. (I’m just saying.)
Morning everyone, I notice that my name is being toss around more. Kinda sad really. I already told you guys that I’m a civilian on day one. Guess people don’t believe me. Trust me, you don’t have to worry about me. If there are any questions you need to ask me directly, please do so by bolding my name so it stands out. I’ll hop on my laptop and do my best to answer then after I get back from Brazilian Jiu Jitsu this afternoon.
can I get a post count tally?
I will revise a new list based on this.
@alphacommando Can you explain again why we should wait until day 6 (was it?) to lynch certain people despite the threat they would pose as mafia? With the understanding that a “good mafia” would certainly kill them by that point.
Just want to make sure I’m concrete on that.
@missingperson alphacommando is guilty.
This is just for now so i am not dqd, however forgedigger feels a little weird to me. Also looking through the last game you guys played it seems icege is pulling the same stuff he did when he was mafia. He “missed” a vote and said he would be gone alot. It could be possible the vote miss was on purpose to play to that as well.
Oops, I misread RT’s post as asking for vote counts.
Interesting point. Still kinda pissed at him personally.
Icege is GUILTY until further notice
That reminds me, I should lock a vote in…
notice me MP IWinALot is Guilty. fancy bolding
I have a small hunch. This vote is subject to change.
@alphacommando And the list was…
DarkGeneral
Pimp Willy
Icege
The Chief
Synonym
Really? Even if none of the above (I was on the list at one point) are playing to full capacity as civs- glaringly so and the inclination of the thread is to distrust them…We shouldn’t consider lynching them until Day 6?
(Because the mafia will kill them before then, if they’re civs.)
Meaning no offense to either, how likely are Icege and PW to be killed by the mafia? Seriously. We nearly invariably lynch Pimp ourselves. Icege has played 1 game in the past year+
I’m not saying everyone should follow in my self-imposed rule. I just don’t want to vote for the 5 strongest Civilians in the first 5 days. If they’re Civ, then Mafia will have to kill them before they sniff them out. If they’re Mafia, their “contributions” will be clear to see by Day 6. I guess I’m saying that I’d rather 6 days of strong Civilians over lynching strong Civilians in the hope that they’re Corrupt. During the first couple of days, the risk of wrongfully lynching a Civilian is greater than the information needed to lynch a Corrupt. So if the chances of being wrong are greater early on, why risk our high-potential Civilians?
@AlphaCommando Anyone on your safe list strike you as being atypically unhelpful or disinterested?
@aidebit i actually do that because i am on mobile and bolding doesnt seem to be working on mobile much like quoting.
Part of what’s making me uneasy about you, AC, is that you’ve stipulated that you absolutely will (RF) or will not (aforementioned list) vote for certain people.
So just to clarify, the 5 votes on me from my perspective are:
OZ: My death will provide him with information that he could gleam from Day 1 apparently, information not specified.
Bious: Because of this post. Also because of tunnels for eyes.
Pimp Willy: Salty that I waste my Day 1 lynch vote on RadicalFuzz. Retaliates by wasting 2 Day votes in a row.
Hecatom: In retaliation to my vote on him and the fact that I hurt his feelings by insulting his grammatical skills.
IWinAlot: Clear bandwagon. Don’t need clarification on this one.
Yeah, not buying this voting trend. I’m okay with getting votes, but I’m gonna need better justification and specific examples for your logic when submitting a vote. The only player that has come close to that is Bious, and his justification was ‘it makes him feel wary’. If anyone can see these 5 votes’ reasonings as different, please let me know. Even better if the 5 that voted give a comprehensive breakdown.
12 hours until day phase ends.
Here is the current vote count:
AlphaCommando (5): Bious, Hecatom, IWinALot, orochizoolander, Pimp Willy
DarkGeneral (3): The Chief, jasonC, Vynce
Synonym (2): Augustus, great cow lord
IWinALot (1): Aidebit
Hecatom (1): AlphaCommando
ForgeDigger (1): crucades
RECESSIONTIME (1): Icege
Icege (1): XthAtGAm3RGuYX
Not Yet Voted (7): Blindknagg, DarkGeneral, ForgeDigger, RECESSIONTIME, Saitsu, SoVi3t, Synonym
Aha, I’m not doing that to mock you, don’t get me wrong. I was just on mobile earlier, sorry.
Not just unhelpful (Pimp Willy) or disinterested (Synonym). At least 1 of the 5 is in my Mafia list.
Like I said, I’m not against them being lynched if the thread comes up with a decent amount of evidence against them. I just won’t be lynching them so that I have time to gather what I believe to be a surmisable amount of evidence. I’d rather take those extra Days to confirm a Mafia than kill a strong Civ prematurely based on a small amount of evidence.