What are you doing to help the civs, exactly?
Also, is it just me, or does it seem like that post belonged in a mafia pm?
Who was he replying to, exactly?
Forge…again, stop trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. He was literally responding to the post above him.
You’re going to have to pay more attention to who’s talking to who considering how unreliable quoting is for most people right now.
Yes…or you could be a mafia trying to make me second guess myself off my vote.
Will anyone else switch their vote to AC so we don’t have a tie? I don’t mind if RT died on the sole basis that whether he’s mafia or civ he will play exactly the same ao he can’t help the cigs he can only hurt (I’d love to be proven wrong) though I’d prefer AC died sooner rather than later.
I get lynched and I flip Civ. What do you do on Day 3?
Man, I need sleep…
Thanks for pointing that out.
The same thing that happens if anyone else that isn’t a blatant wallflower gets lynched and flips Civ.
I don’t think you’re that dirty as of now but don’t think that you’re not expendable either.
Not having them lynched, unlike yourself.
Nobody isn’t expendable, especially on Day 2.
@crucades it may seem contrary to the stated aim of the game, but mislynching a civ, especially day 1 isn’t damning in and of itself.
I like the enthusiasm you’re displaying but I’d place more emphasis on the person’s reasons for voting rather than exclusively the players alignment.
I didn’t lead the lynch on TCJ. I’m not the sole reason he died either.
You can’t just no lynch and then pick on everyone who voted for the person who died.
Something about RT’s last post gives of a “post just to post something” wibe to me.
Also anyone else finds it highly ironic that RT of all people would agree with the anti-wallflower strategy? I’ll wait until he’s back to see if he’ll start posting more before judging him though.
I didn’t see that as snitching myself since the red letters at the bottom of the post already gives it away, and what would Syn gain from “snitching” on someone that would get DQ’d anyway?
I see that you cast your vote for Syn only a few minutes after this post, was there anything else that you noticed or was that the post that tipped the scales?
@Blindknagg he voted for me yesterday too, so chances are it played no part.
** AlphaCommando is Guilty**
May change this later but Alpha’s last post is making me feel wary.
Oddly, RTime is one of the few players I trust right now.
Yeah I guess it’s unrelated then.
Why?
In the experience that I have with him so far (1 game), he seems civ. And he’s intelligent. He does follow the thread. And he’s patient. Much like his av would show. If you played mvc2 and were a colossus player, you had to be both patient and intelligent. But that doesn’t mean I necessarily like how he’s playing, but just that I trust him.
Have you (or anyone, for that matter) played a game where he was mafia? What was he like?
Back home now,
I’m not too concerned with nailing mafia today. I’m more concerned with our two UC’s working together to ensure they maximize their potential so that end-game civilians can take this game.
I propose that each respective UC follow my list when they investigate. They way they can avoid investigating the same person and avoid inconclusive results.
UC: Aidebit, Blindknagg, DarkGeneral, ForgeDigger, IWinALot, Saitsu, SoVi3t, Synonym, XthAtGAm3RGuYX, crucades, alphacommando
dUC: Icege, The Chief, jasonC, Vynce, Augustus, great cow lord, Bious, Hecatom, orochizoolander, Pimp Willy
Don’t bother investigating me, I’ll likely by lynched or night killed in the next 4 cycles.
The one game I’ve played with him when he was mafia (mafia XIII) he posted a lot more than he did in the previous game.
I hope the above link works but if it doesn’t it’s just a search for all of his posts in that game. @DukeC
The UCs don’t know which type of UC they are though so this won’t work.