Oh I see what you mean, the thing though is that I didn’t focus on or even notice kaz’s two posts. I fell asleep near the end of page one, and when I woke up didn’t really read the middle section. The only reason I even mentioned the whole av thing was because I could see manx’s post about it when I was writing up mine and avatar stealing is super srs biz.
Why do you think that post would get you killed though? You seem to prefix a lot of your posts with that (especially last game), and I can’t see how saying that would do anything if the mafia is going to kill you about knowing to much, and it also (to me) makes all of those posts quite confrontational.
lol yeah, I really hope somebody is keeping tabs of these roleclaims for later on. Hell, just gimme a list of people who’ve roleclaimed this first day. Should prove useful come lynchin’ time…
I might consider it a survival tactic while others would call it annoying. I did it… last game (god I hate that logic) and I never died.
The game before that I died night 1.
My gameplay is shaping itself as I gain experience. Even if I dont point out that I think I might die, my actions in the thread will still be riddled with the assumption.
I understand it’s day 1 which is always a crapshoot for all of us unless like I said someone pulls an @BullDancer or @Dramatix but with 5 pages and the majority of it being interesting discussion as opposed to bullshit filler like it usually is I just meant that I think every civ can do better than a hunch, especially a smart guy like bious.
For example my reasoning to suspect MP was obviously shaky, but at least there was some logic to it for a day1 read and who knows maybe it was a mafia slip up we may revisit later on for whatever reason.
@AlphaCommando so how do you feel about CK and his butt hurt reaction to me voting him? I’ve 'already made it clear that I have no clue whether he’s mafia or not, all I know is that a wallflower who refuses to ever explain his voting choices is always a liability and never an asset so why keep him around?
Like I said if anyone has a better lynch candidate then CK I’m all ears, but please explain your reasoning.
I’m with OZ regarding removing dead weight but my criteria is a little different.
Instead of trying to hit one out of the park regarding calling out mafia, I’ve resorted more to a ‛prove your worth’ type of strategy.
I’m a big fan of contribution that isn’t hidden within walls of text or code speak. I am less likely to vote to lynch people who I feel are genuinely trying to help us win.
For those reasons, I’m leaving OZ, AC and MP of of my vote list for as long as its logical.
Day 1 lists are garbage…
…but if I had to vote someone right now it would be WTF-AKUMA-HAX. Mainly because I want him to contribute more than he has thus far.
Call my vote aggressive but I have my reasons.
Combo_Knight is always an easy vote for me but for some reason, I’m not comfortable lynching him right now.
FWIW, if I had to vote right now, it’d be for Exodus. or Sovi3t. Not fully comfortable stating why, but it also wouldn’t be too hard to figure out if you APPLY yourself! (And no, RF, that’s not code talking.)
@orochizoolander, your back-and-forth with CK is indeed informative.
I never saw that. Nobody let us in, then pretended they could be new bytches with sexobytch or whatever.
But I’m seeing immediately how that becomes a clear advantage for Mafia here, role hunting Piccolo, starting from day 1 if you got your way initially, without you-yourself thinking it through?
For making a billion million posts in the DG game, making it a billion million pages long, and potentially scaring away what’s his face, lurkmode
I apologize.
Your post there is good, maybe, if the facts line up. A cursory glance, I like it. Except fusing just means nail died and Piccolo and him get a PM. Nothing OP or new skills.
If it made sense, I’d vote myself. Frankly, I feel like my posts have been enough to get insightful conversation started or to just move conversation forward.
I cant help that people choose not to engage. If have alot of opinions. Just waiting for opportunities to share them instead of blurting it all out in one mega post.
I see the toast this game is from Texas. I love being the instigator of these games because even when mafia are trying to sway the flow of conversation and blend in, I still feel it’s better to have everyone talking rather than have everyoen clam up and just post filler that makes the page count grow but the useful info shrink.
@WAH I’m glad you found that post length acceptable as I probably won’t make a longer post than that.
@pietastic I’m glad my provocation of CK amuses you, hopefully you find something useful in there even if it’s an accusation towards me =P.
I really feel there is enough info so far to make a solid case against at least 1 player so I’m definitely going to read this thread a few times and if I can’t come up with a decent lynch target by tonight I guess CK will be my default choice for tomorrow, as chief said he’s the “safe” target.
As for the discussion now being geared towards whether MP is guilty or not…I’m sure at least 1 mafia is part of that conversation, but for now I’ll keep MP on the back burner as I don’t have a confident read on him yet and probably won’t until tomorrow’s tally.
I’m curious to get a feel for the game do we think mafia will clump up votes tomorrow or spread them? And is anyone doing a vote tally? I’ll admit I’m too lazy for that so I’d really appreciate if someone could get on that
We could potentially have 3 more pages of stuff, twice before the first vote.
So don’t just get picked up as a vote on a bandwagon that hurts the town. And not even thinking about the vote, lest you want to be seen as- one of those.