I never said anything about it clearly wasn’t happening that he was roleless, just that I’ve never seen him as roleless, thus I don’t know how he plays it to buy his claim.
So you can take that gamblers fallacy claim, and shove it all in on your blackjack (hole)
R1, so yes, at the start. It seems nigh impossible to have an opening strategy that would assist the civs, which then leads to sheer odds at that point, unless someone does something stupid to give themselves away. Between that thought in mind as well as the old hat of “R1 No Lynch is the worst thing you can do!”, I’m having a hard time to grasp at why RVS is just as bad as a “hard read” (read: blind vote + inevitable bandwagon).
also i don’t see the point about how rvs is an advantage to mafia since the point of RVS is to help town/civilians get out of just dicking around which is way more advantageous to mafia.
Can’t rule it out as a real possibility or invaluable resource. Otherwise, yeah- we just end up trying to deduce who’s dirty by who voted for who and when
Wouldn’t no Random Lynch favor town? More town minds to collab at the beginning mean the mafia have lower odds of influencing the group, I would think (yea, we can’t verify who’s truly who but I don’t like 1/20 odds with no information)