SAD you can start by not lying about your vote and prove your real motivations.
And stop getting on both bandwagons. In the face of AC had a lot of support to be lynched, you took no sides and brought up pie which I agreed with you if I didn’t follow the whole day going on, then your day that ended up with Aidebit dead.
Actually… I noticed that as well and held off on typing it up. Why? Cause Alpha killing him meant they may have had some fear they were getting bluffed by Jones and since Alpha was getting lynched if he lived decided to play it safe. If Jones was bluffing and had an important role? Good. If not? They’d lose some who was already in more danger than them. I don’t think Alpha called that kill by the way.
This is actually a good counterpoint. The only thing I can really say to this is that if I was mafia I would have probably gotten the rest of the mafia to:
1: Leave Coco alone as a quasi confirmed civ without a chance to use his ability. Coco as a confirmed civ really doesn’t help civs much. A beacon of knowledge he is not.
2: Pushed a lynch on him at another time to neutralize his ability. *
& had sumazndude direct quotes where he said that line because nobody remembers, not even him, or is that on purpose to make us forget who he wanted to vote for
Pie just looks really off to me… I can’t really put my finger on it because he’s not posting as much as he normally would. He’s not so forward as usual in the beginnings and now, he’s just defining wallflower
Pie was your number one suspect after Pie goes after AC, then AC goes after 3SL. Before anything was picking up steam, AC had the most votes there thru like page 14-15.
You say no to either and say you will vote for pie
My DukeC read was at face value, because that’s typically how you have to read new players.
My reads against newer players are really bad compared to players I’ve played against before. I was feeling myself too hard, and failed to realize that until now. I’ll take the brunt of my trying to clear him because I seriously thought it was because he was new.
As much as you lurk I had to check your activity once, during the first end of the vote where you disappeared but you were active refreshing, not a proof in the face of where is @Hecatom who explains that so we don’t check if he’s online to vote and he votes on time now.
But you have got to know as little words as you want to use, every one is important now.
I think I know what you’re doing here but go ahead and spell out what you mean.
I did suspect AC a bit, but by the time I did, AC built up a bandwagon that could have potentially saved him from being lynched.
In fear of a no lynch/tie I voted 3SL to see where this would go. Take 1 step back to make a giant leap forward? I’m sure we just progressed.
With AC dead, I do suspect Pie significantly less though.
Okay so that’s a dead end right? Same as anyone else saying:
“I suspect wallflowers, like this one guy, I don’t know, he could be mafia… but I don’t know whyy”
How do you get rid of them? With a lynch majority, or bandwagon starting so they falter as a real mafia and prove your suspicion or get cleared as you get them to participate more.
I wanted to lynch pie over how that string seemed to tie you with him voting you instead of Aidebit, Aidebit dies clean, both of you suspected eachother with nary a reason, and continue the game or get away.
who else wanted to vote with you on pietastic but me? So why didn’t you believe me or work with me on the Aidebit thing. It really looked like you’re hiding how you coordinated that if it takes me all of this work to try to get anything new out of you. Yeah my bad I’m grilling only you, out of lots of bandwagon voters but I explained that before. I could go for pie but like you said he is being more quiet so we either believe him and his face value votes to let him do his thing, but there should be a vigi now to keep these guys in check.