Also, I was at Cold Stone Creamery last week, and asked for something with cinnamon topping in it. The girl behind the counter kept turning around with shakers and asking her manager, “Does this have synonym in it?”
pie didn’t actually lead all of that. Someone had to do it first but we know how you feel about those and want us to forget who did something first.
It was all snowballing on AC before his rebuttal and big deflect to 3SL. You didn’t want to put in an AC vote, you didn’t want to build any case on pie after AC built a big case on someone, Which proved false and got us all, a big new group of voters? or some of the same people on every bandwagon too though?
Remember people expect more out of your playing and you can’t sit back and get carried until the end, so by not participating, you don’t have to have a big role again, but you could have the Mafia role. Its been enough games where we can’t consider you to always be civ no matter what and give you a real free pass to survive long past when we should’ve seen a lot of your behavior - I pegged you as the quiet mafia, pie could be the brash one early.
You want to clarify when you knew Duke and AC were mafia? you don’t get a free pass just because you might be a power role and already talked to somebody about everything.
Sorry to out you again, but how about why did you start the game, me quoting Kaz page 1 of the sign up thread rules, and throw a ton of weight my way when you removed kaz’s name from the quote
replaced it only with me, saying “he knows all the roles, listen to AKUMAHAX!” - you think I forgot about that already just because it didn’t work and have any takers?
Wallflowers be wallflowers… I’m telling you now, I have yet to be Mafia. Is my behavior any different from when I had big roles or not and before? I need not to act differently because of some special role. Sure, I have some games under my belt but, are you really going to expect a fuck ton more from an established behavior as a wallflower?
The problem I have with leaving Oerba alive is that we always, always, ALWAYS end up killing all the high contributors and end up at end-game with a bunch of low-contributors. Just once let’s try it the other way around. My spidey sense is tickling around Oerba. If I’m wrong I’m happy to take a lynch to prove that I’m not trying to steer the civs away from the high posters in some sort of crazy mafia strategy.
If I were AC, I knew that I could choose my kill target and that I would be lynched the next day I would be torn over what to do.
On the one hand, he can use his now-worthless life to clear a potential minefield for his teammates. Thus, confirming that the bomber role has been eliminated for my teammates to kill with impunity.
On the other hand, if I were to stay alive and eat a lynch it means that my teammates were guaranteed another cycle without any chance of being lynched.
I don’t know if you should be so forgiving, pie was on that bandwagon that could have saved him from being lynched before both of us
You never gave your reasons pie can be dirty, like you’re working with him and can’t reveal any of that. Plus he voted for AC’s target and switched from AC, that big 180. I caught that and you didn’t seem to mind at the time, nor now to even think it was a big deal?
@mp: shrink-wrapped cryogenic Aussie jizz. Now that’s a topping. You may have a million dollar idea.
I’m confused about those who accuse me of wall flowering. I contribute more insight in fewer words than most players. No sense in just posting fluff.
Speaking of which, where the hell is OZ? Shit’s not just going to blow over, @orochizoolander. Still eyeing him, MP, SAD, DG, then GR for my suspect list.
His big 180, I did read upon it and found it odd to just suddenly switch directions. I do find the underlined part very interesting though. I tried going back to look at the voting order that was building up on 3SL and He just submitted his vote snap like that. Out of his silence, he just jumps onto another bandwagon
Good, might want to specify that - now the other one? Stop making me post so much to get these answers. You directly messed with me and I indirectly brought that up, and maybe forgot about the other things you did towards me so far besides that.
Me personally? No. If he had a power role, he bought himself some immunity.
I think it was always possible to lynch him later if need be or have Vigi kill him to see if he was telling the truth (Thankfully that didn’t come to fruition). I even said as much. If I was mafia, I would’ve just let that roll, when people were tired of him hanging around and there was still mafia left, he could’ve been lynched to prove how truthful he was.
That was one yomi I wouldn’t really touch if I was mafia.
Oerba makes slight sense since it could be possible he didn’t see the role claim, but I still think there are bigger fish to fry, and we can always lynch Oerba later due to lack of reads if we need to.
As far as who is left, I’d anticipate that anyone earlier in this phase was trying to start a wagon, and got it, they probably aren’t mafia. We’ve taken out two mafia in one night. They have at most, 4 left, I’d anticipate, just due to the game numbers. They aren’t going to want to implicate themselves anymore. Especially in games where if you run a lynch wagon, you are either mafia lynching mafia to make yourself look civ, or mafia lynching civ to decimate their numbers.
I want to look at people playing closer to the vest right now.