SRK Mafia XI: Vampires Vs Werewolves - Game Over: Town Wins!

What I’m saying is that the end credits will be the same if the coroner checks him due to Dracula’s Sacrifice ability. The ability states that "they die by ANY means Dracula wishes, and will be revealed as any role he wishes"
That only means two possible things could have happen ( I don’t know where you’re getting the doctor stuff from ) a:Van sniped him, b: he was sacrificed. That’s it. The only question is rather the coroner’s report will come up “killed by vampire” or “killed by human” I assume the Dracula ability would trump in this case if Soviet was indeed sacrificed.

The coroner won’t be able to confirm if it was a clean hit or not. Are you serious? We already played into the Mafia’s trap the first day and got rid of our detective, why wouldn’t we want to explore what the enemy is up to this time around?

The wolves could have killed him as well. It’s not 100% clear who targeted him.

And that’s it from me on how Soviet died.

Bolded for emphasis… the narrator thinks Helsing did it, but it’s not for sure.

  1. Because it accomplishes nothing as someone will always say there was X chance of something else happening.
  2. And how are you so sure it was a Mafia trap?

Everyone believes mafia can’t kill N1.

Well, how can they?

Mafia couldn’t have known Coco was Detective. We got unlucky.

By exploiting an oversight that we may not have seen? We’ve been question rules to this moment. Why assume we suddenly grasp everything.

@3s - Apparently only Helsing and the Doctor have the ability to kill N1. Ironically, it was overlooked that so can Dracula if he uses Sacrifice.

And WTF do you mean “WE”!?

lol - I’m trippin’. You said “unlucky”.

This.

So VERY MUCH this.

I do not think 3SLove was using bad English - I think he flubbed, and gave his points (teeth) away, with that post.

How the fuck could the wolves have done it…they had no assassin yet ( this has been discussed and confirmed more than once )

I’m not 100 percent sure, but I REALLY don’t enjoy the idea of totally writing something off as “Van is gdlke”

Also, food for thought.

Adam reinvents himself in these games more often than he changes handles.

I was cautiously optimistic that he was on our (the civs) side.

But I am absolutely at a loss as to why he wants to explore the deficit angle so hard.

That said, however…

Vynce is in jail, true enough.

But roles were assigned at random.

Just because he was jailed, and a potential sacrifice was made, does not exonorate him of being the vamp leader.

…it could also mean that Drac is deferring to a more savvy Initiate, for tactics.

I’m not insinuating that they knew Coco was detective…only that he wasn’t part of the PM. So we ( I say “we” talking about the group even though I was against the shit ) were led to making a very bad decision. I’m just trying not to let the mafia have they’re way with the group again.

Read the Phoenix Write game Kaz/Crotch chapter for ref.

Bious, let me make something clear.

There needs to be an Assassin before either faction gets to kill at night. The only way to get an Assassin is to Promote a Mafia. Assassinate and Promote are both Major actions. Only one Major action can be taken each night. It is impossible for a faction to have both Promoted a member to an Assassin and Assassinated somebody on Night 1.

Also, to the people saying he could’ve been killed by Doctor, that’s wrong. If the Doctor “cures” a starting Vampire the writeup will say “SoVi3t has been cured”. Obviously we’d know he was a Vampire and lynch him the following day, but he wouldn’t die from the Cure action.

Dracula specifically has the “Sacrifice” ability. If he was Jailed I don’t see how he could use that ability. Same goes for “Promote”

Fuck chief, I genuinely thought I would be able to somewhat trust you as a civ…you’re playing way too coy about this ish. I wish I knew if you were just planning something for later or what. I’m mindfracked again

^
I wasn’t clear, the above is going on the assumption that Vynce is Dracula and SoVi3t was sacrificed. I believe that would be impossible given the rules.

Also, when different theories arise, you’ll notice that some people openly embrace the face value of events while rejecting analysis. It makes it easier to see whose trying to deter progress and who’s helping.

Thats key in figuring out whose working together.

For example, if an analytical player suddenly stops being analytical, that could br seen as a tell.

After re-reading the rules that does seem to be the case. So the Wolf attack theory is out.

And that’s exactly why I said to leave it to the coroner, yet you really want to keep pushing this.