SRK Mafia VII: Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Edition - APOCALYPSE (GAME OVER)

That’s all I needed to hear.

Lynch orochizoolander.

True, the last thing we want is to potentially lose important assets for the civ side just because some harsh decisions made on the heat of a moment.

Hopefully in the worst case GCL will be a merely civi.

Dunno if Spidey should check Vynce to see if he is clean or not when the night phase starts.
BTW, if i understand correctly Spider Man can investigate 2 people per night right?
So i guess that it could be a good idea to throw in some names for him to check when the night phase starts.

I forgot to add:

**1. Once you have placed a lynch vote, IT CANNOT BE CHANGED.

  1. When you type out who you are about to lynch, the format must be like so: Lynch: InsertNameHere
    It must be BOLD and UNDERLINED, and it MUST be the phrase “Lynch: Name”**

Got my coffee reading the thread over,

WTF!!!

Jailed, not banned. He can still post but he hasn’t been on in 2 days (game started “a day ago”)

]
It’s a game of healthy suspicion. That said in a real life apocalypse scenario I’d be fucking toast. “Hey, guys, can’t we just be frienBANG” [Exodus. dead]

So you vote the inactive that has fewest votes?

[quote=“NoodleHead;8113379”@Exodus: It’s not really serious, but I have a very light suspicion on you based on the first 3-4 posts (except the last post) of yours. I’ve got a few other ones in mind, but nothing screams a major fuck-up to me just yet. [/quote]

No worries just checking.

Lynch: great cow lord

I don’t particularly care for it. Manx and eivel weren’t getting enough votes in the next 10 minutes.

So are people that voted not like that having their votes not count?

Spidey can investigate one person to see if they’re clean/dirty and another ability to investigate to see if they have a role.
Could be useful to split them up to learn about two different people but if you use them on the same person you get a lot more information.

Wait, so if we didn’t underline it, it doesn’t count? So we need to send it again?

… Could we switch targets if we need to send it in again?

Lynch orochizoolander sending it into SW now

Lynch: Great Cow Lord

Since rereading and seeing him pointing fingers without justifiable cause is dumb. Because “feelings” ain’t gonna save your ass without some blackout.

All votes for this day, no matter the format, are being counted. All new rules are from this moment on.

Thanks SWB. By the way no matter what anyone says the fact is none of us including myself knew if SWB was going to eliminate me due to my mistake. So before he made the call I admitted I was a regular civ knowing there would be a good chance I’d be outed by SWB anyways. That should eliminate anyone who found me suspicious earlier unless roles aren’t announced when a player dies/is taken out of the game.

There are people who are voting for inactives when it has been established by previous games that the GM always takes care of them, so voting for an inactive is a waste of a lynch. Also the most obvious mafia tactics are to blend in with the crowd AKA start/hop on a bandwagon, post just enough to seem innocent without actually saying anything useful, and get civs to tie up votes and cause a no lynch.

On top of those obvious targets you have Noodle and Wonkey who voted no lynch which is as red a flag as there is in the mafia game on day 0 and even after all this you idiots still votes for those who don’t fall under these dead giveaways like me.

I understand we have a lot of new players and I made a big mistake myself with the quote edit however, that doesn’t excuse the enormous lack of common sense most of you have.

**SERIOUSLY IF NOTHING ELSE READ THIS POST AND SEE WHO MEETS THE CONDITIONS I LISTED KILL THEM FIRST IF THERE ARE NO MAFIA AMONG THEM GO AHEAD AND LYNCH ME NEXT! **

:slight_smile:

no, I think its great that I’m going out first. since of pride actually. I’m pretty sure everyone is going to get some type of clues of who’s who. look how it switch from lets lynch the inactives to lets bandwagon gcl. a couple of people don’t really have a reason for me. but what evs’. MP leading the lynching on me. three of the Mafia are joining him on this. on of the Mafia members put his/her vote some where else.

when I do die today.
Mafia should kill MP tonight or they’re quite stupid.

But if we’re PM’ing the vote to you, does it really matter if we change the vote here? I mean I understand if we’re only allowed to lynch once a day in the PM’s, but I don’t see why we can’t change our minds before sending you the PM. Is the idea that we merely suggest who we’re going to vote for, then when the time comes, we bold and underline it to make it easier for us to keep track of? If so, that makes sense.

Voting is closed.

Only mafia will try to refute and manipulate the truth of my above post, do not let them sway you, I’ll shutup and be happy if all the civs do is take my advice posted above.

Ask yourselves what do the civs have to gain from a day1 no lynch compared to what mafia have to gain? After you arrive at that answer you guys will clearly see the logic is sound. I have no clue if Noodle or Wonkey are mafia or not but just for even suggesting we go no lynch they stick out as far more suspicious than anyone else.

After they’re killed we should look into this 2nd band wagon that has formed on evil lord, if GCL is mafia than it could be a misdirection tactic to get the votes to tie and result in a no lynch.

Man I FUCKIN LOVE THOS GAME!

Why should I be dying tonight? If I’m wrong, why would they want to oust someone that just got a civ killed if I’m wrong, that fingers are going to be pointed at in the next day phase for a massive blunder.

Even better if I survive the night phase for them, because then there’s going to be a massive outcry for my head, claiming I’m mafia. They basically get a three-for-one if I’m wrong.

Guess we’ll know once Beta gets the story typed up.

swb: what about inactives?

@orochizoolander: Read more, post less. You write too much, and clearly you aren’t using your brain at all.

The statement “No lynch gives no clue” is false because there will always be kills from Mafia at night. The idea of “giving Mafia a free kill” is funny because it is supposedly worse than “kill your own, then have Mafia kill another one of your own the night later?”

If it comes down to my opinion, the clue you can get from a lynched civ on day 1 is definitely not worth the headcount that would come handly as the game progresses. The clue you get FROM A KILLED CIV ON NIGHT 1 is often the starting point where people gather the information. Please go and do some research on the past games that were played in SRK, TZ, TN, Bombedon, NF, etc. I am pretty sure that once you read through 10 games or so, you will have the same conclusion as I am.

… until then, please do us a favor and calm down. People who disagree w/ you aren’t always have to be Mafia members.

I’m too ingrained in this thing, that I’m checking the thread, waiting for the inevitable, so I can crash.

True, but at this point of the game i think that he could be more useful by investigating multiple targets and when the number of players is trimmed down he could start investigating more meticulously.

As for Ghost Rider, i think that he shouldn’t kill at least for this night, considering the cap on his kills, if GCL is a civ adding the civ that will be killed by the Capcoms would put us on disadvantage.

I admiti, what sovi3t did in the last game was hillarious and in the end worked, but i feel that it wouldn’t be the case for this one.

Good question, I just assumed SWB would eliminate anyone who’s inactive for 2 cycles in arrow as previous GM’s have done.

I’ve read on other forums how these mafia games go down, and in every SRK one so far I take actual notes to keep track of all the craziness so I think I know what I’m talking about which is more than I can say for you. The vote tallies are invaluable for cross referencing who people vote for versus who they say they will vote for and for patterns obviously however, the off chance of nailing a mafia through luck always exists with a day1 lynch. Also the death of a civ (when they’re are a lot of civs left) shakes up the game more than if there was a no lynch in which the status quo is kept which is exactly what the mafia wants.

I’m surprised you keep harping on this, losing 1 civ when there are so many left is somehow a bigger loss to you than losing the chance to hit a mafia and gain some intel that will likely be valuable later on? Yeah I don’t think so. The no lynch option is useful but not this early on. The first few days are random and information is more valuable than gold here you should know this by now.

Day 1 no lynch has never benefitted civs. Does lynching a civ accidentally hurt us overall of course, but the risk to reward ratio is in the civs favor considering there are 30 civs left. Now if after a few lynches we still don’t have a single mafia and then powers come into play okay I can keep a more open mind about a no lynch, but until then it’s a dumb idea.