So many tools in this thread. I wanna break into your house, beat you to a bloody pulp, then casually walk away while you do nothing about it, you beta white knights.
They forfeited their lives the moment they decided to break in to another person’s home.
Allow me to clarify… If someone broke into my home and immediately tried to flee upon being discovered, I’d hold them until the cops arrived. However, if they showed any kind of aggressive towards me or my family, their head’s coming off. Not taking chances with our lives. They gotta go.
Like pedoviejo said, the cops can’t do SHIT until after the fact. You expect me to wait until they pull a gun on us before I decide force is necessary? By then it’s too late. You’re one naive ass person if you truly think that’s a good decision. I’d rather gamble on going to prison than letting my family get hurt. Can’t depend on others to save you all the time… Sometimes, you gotta save yourself.
This is a post assault 80 year old man, not Usain Bolt mother fuckers how fast could he possibly have been?
What was the chase,like 10 feet out of his door?
I had that in the back of my mind, but felt like it wasn’t really relevant. How did she manage to get chased down by an 80 year old man with a broken collar bone? They said they ran through the garage and into an alleyway… That alleyway had to have been RIGHT next to the house.
only desperate burglars do this and they should get what they deserve. but real burglars usually wait till the owners are on vacation or absent for the day.
real pros dont even leave a trace. recently they stole an acquaintance’s apartment while he was at work.
they took everything (TV, laptop,PS3, even some cages with canaries!). Police scanned the apartment for fingerprints and couldnt find anything. Laptop had a lot of material he used for his work, almost 1000$ worth. the PS3 was found later at a garbage bin…it still works
but I also heard cases where burglars just stole just food from the fridge…
A thread about law and morals will never end since law and morals are relative and subjective concepts, but it seems people many here don’t realize that. You guys will never solve this situation with endless subjective opinions.
So, you just want to beat a dead horse over and over while knowing it is pointless? You might as well bang your head against a brick wall since it’s just as pointless. This thread is all about stroking your own Ego so that you can justify your viewpoint as better. Does validation really get you going? Do you require it so that you can feel better about yourself? Please don’t be that insecure.
I’m not beating the horse though. I’ve said my piece a couple of pages ago. I’m ready man, for when this turns into a food tier thread or about the finer specifics of Dorothy’s ass crack. You just don’t understand boy.
In my book, that’s the very definition of ‘right’.
The law is nothing but an abstraction. There are places where the law says a person should be put to death for blasphemy. Would you so mindlessly support that as well?
Shooting her was self preservation on his part. Lots of u keep saying let the cops do their job sounds great but obviously the cops failed. If they did their job the woman would have been in jail and the incident never happens.
Her being pregnant was really beside the point. If the man wasn’t in direct and imminent danger I don’t feel that you can make an argument for self defense. What he did was vengeance resulting in murder.
(Good to see Starhammer has seen Glinda for what she really is.)
I’m still confused at what people who think he committed murder actually want to see happen to the old man given that no one answered that question when I asked it in that lengthy post on page 5. I guess I’ll never know.
Oh well. No big loss.
I never said her being pregnant or not was actually relevant. I was merely stating that, for a fact, she wasn’t since people keep bringing it up anyway despite the fact that we’ve known for a week now that she wasn’t.