if he did it in the house he can at least make a case for self defense
chasing someone down and executing them is no longer self defense, it’s murder. and one of the best parts about western society as opposed to some 3rd world shithole is due process
its not up to citizens to determine whats warranted or justified, it’s a courts job in front of a jury of your peers’s job to determine that
So it’s about the bullshit, flawed ass law then… Gotcha.
The fact that it’s a matter of where she was killed and not why that decides whether or not this counts as self-defense should raise a red flag all on its own.
Are you truly so dense as to be unable to even partially put the events together in your mind?
Ok, 80 year old man’s house was broken into. He was then assaulted to which degree we dont know. It’s very likely he was concussed or not in his right mind.
He is able to get a hold of his gun, and in fear of his life chased after them and shot her.
Self defense, justified and in the right on the side of the law.
It’s ugly, very fucking ugly but it was not his ugliness that needs to be borne witness to. It’s the criminal’s who committed a home invasion with assault and possibly worse had they not been stopped.
You guys aren’t going to get to these self righteous ass hats because they cannot comprehend that although he did kill somebody. The events leading up to the supposed “execution” (sensationalist bullshit term btw), there was no way he would have behaved in a “rational” matter as proposed by these idiots.
The facts point that after he was assaulted all actions he took was to survive, for fear of his life (both in the present and future), and ensure this shit wouldn’t happen again . Any lapse in judgement is now a legal grey area. Which is left there by the law so that it can look at it on a case by case basis. Something social warriors cannot comprehend until it happens to them.
These idiots want to ask the question
His legal limits and obligations vs the rights of the criminal who is now a victim of murder
why? because i believe that the rule of the law should stand and that people shouldn’t be vigilantes and gun people down when they arent in any immediate danger?
being assaulted is not just cause for murder after the fact
try again
jesus christ its like you guys think he was in the middle of getting beat down when he took his gun out and shot her. he left his residence after the incident
is the world better off now that she’s dead? probably. does it make what the old guy did right? NOPE
Ideally, he would have called the police and let them do their jobs. It’s one thing to have your house broken into by an unknown person, but in this case, he has direct descriptions of those accountable. Also, now that they know this guy is packing and ready to use it, it would be far less likely for them to come back. They weren’t looking for a fight when they robbed this guy, they were just really, REALLY stupid in how they did it.
That said, in his shoes, I could very easily see myself doing the exact same thing as this old man, but that doesn’t make it right in the eyes of the law.
They weren’t looking for a fight when the robbed this guy? Would that be before or after they assaulted him broke his collarbone and left him for dead as they went to steal more things?
That would be when the decided to rob his house when he wasn’t home rather than just kick down the front door when they knew he was there. He came home when he did and rather than just hightail it out of there, they decided to try and take him out so they wouldn’t get caught. Once he got his gun, that changed everything for them and they tried to get out with their lives. Not entirely successful, there. But you can’t say that they were looking for a fight when they went to rob an absentee 80 year old man. That’s just ridiculous.
Who the fuck cares whether they were looking for a god damned fight or not? They:
-BROKE INTO A MAN’S HOUSE
-BEGAN STEALING SHIT THAT WASN’T THEIRS
-BEAT THE LIVING SHIT OUT OF AN OCTOGENARIAN WHEN HE CAME HOME
-CONTINUED TO ROB THE MAN
-TRIED TO ESCAPE WHEN THE VICTIM PULLED A GUN, BUT FAILED.
What does their motive to fight have to do with any of this?
It would matter a lot to the people saying “They’ll come back and kill him later!” Obviously they didn’t want none of the guy when they found out he had a gun. He was out of imminent danger when they fled the scene. Killing in that case is doesn’t exactly fall under the terms of justifiable homicide.
Ol’ sheltered, naive ass individuals who’ve never seen serious conflict a day in their lives… Let’s see how YOU feel when this happens to you or a loved one. I’ll bet anything you won’t be worrying about what the bullshit law says your allowed to do under what specific circumstances.
News flash: The law failed the moment this guy’s house was broken into and the culprit wasn’t caught, allowing them to return multiple times, eventually leading to this. Anyone who believes you can or should sit around and let the law/government handle everything is seriously retarded. There are times when you need to take your life in your own hands, because the law won’t always make it in time or even at all. Keep depending on it and see where you end up.