You are just lucky enough to have police officers beheaded in the middle of the street while people stand around and watch.
Very lucky indeed
Shit man, it’s about the “struggle” that excuses all crimes we’d better back the fuck off.
No, fuck you and fuck your struggle, a person who would break into an old person’s house, beat them up and steal their shit is human garbage, no matter what their situation, bitch just got put where she belongs.
Man SMH how are you going to support a women who breaks into an 80 year old’s home MULTIPLE TIMES and your excuse for it is “the struggle is real”. What about some people who did struggle and now we’re in a good place and did it through HARD WORK. I did/do struggle and I worked hard and overcame. And I have no sympathy for people who abuse that fact.
Don’t mount that high horse of yours so quickly in many ways Europe had been ass backwards and for a MUCH longer time than America…so gain some perspective.
“The lady didn’t run as fast as the man, so I shot her in the back twice,” Greer told KNBC-TV on Wednesday. “She says, ‘Don’t shoot me! I’m pregnant, I’m going to have a baby!’ and I shot her anyway.”
Sorry but this guy is a sick fuck,
Maybe its the guys demeanor during the interview that makes me hate him, but to me someone begging for their life should mean more than petty vengeance killing.
Petty beating, home invasion, robbery, and lying… At that to her list of faults. So what if she begged for her life? Did she apologize for what she just did to this man? Did she show remorse? No. She had one last opportunity to redeem herself, and she chose to lie. Ever heard of “playing possum”? What if he decided to take pity on her, lower the gun, and she jumped him and took it? He’d be dead and you’d be saying that he should’ve shot her when he had the chance.
She did not earn any pity, nor did she deserve it.
It’s only since WW2 has there been any sort of collaboration on governing policies, but still European laws vary a lot from country to country
ok read some more, they had priors and they broke his collar bone ( and aparently the guys mom was involved or something idk)
with a broken collar bone I can see the old man’s K-groove being maxxed out BUT he still chased a woman down and shot her in the back because she was an easier kill for him… he should be punished.
A big thank you towards @pedoviejo @Hotobu @The Damned @MotM and whoever answered/quoted my posts.
Sorry if I forget someone, just did a quick roundup - was a very insightful and nice read, thanks for your time.
This thread is a really interesting one to read. 
And btw, broken collar bone.
I had one when I crashed with my mountain bike in the woods. You don’t want to experience that pain.
You seriously don’t. The aftermath is a nightmare.
Remember this when you need the United State’s help during war again.
Let’s see, he’s 80!!!, just got assaulted by two people a quarter his age, and its the FOURTH TIME his home has been broken into.
@Matriarch, you’re a feminist right? Should she have lived because she was a woman?
Do we have to excuse women for all the wrong doings they do now?
If we “struggle” does that mean we can get away with it? Or only women?
By that logic, rapist shouldn’t be locked up. "Oh, he was just “struggling” to find some companionship, so he did what he did."
Is that cool?
"Oh she’s got 4 kids and “struggling” and she held up a liquor store at gunpoint, but it’s ok, she’s on hard times."
Is that cool?
When you violate the law and the personal freedoms of someone else, your immediate situation/or reasoning does not excuse you from any and all consequences.
He didn’t chase her, he chased them. She only got shot because she didn’t run as fast.
How can you acknowledge all of this, and still say he should be punished? You literally make zero sense. I think you’re the one with the problem, sir.
[quote=“Phantom_Angel, post:226, topic:170624”]
neither one of us were there, he fired his gun in his house (police havent said if anyone was struck at this time) then they ran, then he chased them and killed her in an alley.
at least Zimmerman showed some remorse…this old man dont GAF.
Remember this when you need the United Kingdom to back you in starting a war again
I don’t recall Zimmerman showing remorse, I remember the speech his lawyers wrote him and the paintings he sold, but no honest apology.
This old man has no reason to apologize after everything he has gone through, he still needs to be charged with murder though.
Zimmerman said straight up that he’d have done it again if he was allowed to relive the situation… WHAT remorse?
You keep talking about how he didn’t have any remorse, but why should he? THEY didn’t have any, so why should he?
You guys were the lubricant but believe you-me, America was the dick.
I would not disagree with you there 
What about it?
Not saying the guy deserves murder 2 or whatever they might be planning, but your statement does not mean two shits to a citizen committing an execution over crimes.
1 Do we have to excuse women for all the wrong doings they do now?
2 If we “struggle” does that mean we can get away with it? Or only women?
3 By that logic, rapist shouldn’t be locked up. “Oh, he was just “struggling” to find some companionship, so he did what he did.” Is that cool?
4 "Oh she’s got 4 kids and “struggling” and she held up a liquor store at gunpoint, but it’s ok, she’s on hard times."
Is that cool?
5 When you violate the law and the personal freedoms of someone else, your immediate situation/or reasoning does not excuse you from any and all consequences.
[/quote]
1WTF DO WOMEN HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING?? it was a person begging for their life, it just so happens that this person said she was pregnant…sooooo fuckit i guess. 2 for the price of one?
2 read 1
3 are you really comparing rape to home invasion?? really?? well maybe if they raped this old man i can see he killing them…and it would make this alot more interesting.
4 This wasnt even armed robbery. it was home invasion.
breaking & entering = 45 days in jail and 6 months probation
California has two sets of guidelines for first degree armed robbery. If the crime was committed with more than one person and within a home or inhabited building, the sentence range is three to nine years in state prison. Otherwise, the range is three to six years
Read more: http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/violent_crimes/robbery-degrees.htm#ixzz38nBPuyUm
5 agreed, shes dead and thats all their is to that. this man took the law into his hands as he saw fit. all that we’re talking about here is if he should be punished, I feel the answer is yes.
let me clarify, Im not trying to see this guy spend what little time he has left behind bars, but he clearly has committed aggravated murder. can we at least agree on that??
You can argue that she was defenseless so he shouldn’t have shot her, but you can’t use the same argument for him when the very same “defenseless” woman beat and robbed this man in his own home when he was defenseless? How does that make sense? You guys are all over the place when it comes to logic.