What’s OG?
Original Gangsta
You can play as Gangsta’s in Third Strike?
Dude…
Yes, his name is Q.
Good thing I said SEQUEL so nobody would misunderstand. Do you read, or just look at words and instead make educated guesses at what people are talking about? You obviously don’t know my post history so don’t lump me in with posers. We all know the reasons behind updates(which, oddly enough, aren’t SEQUELS). You’re pussy-footing around the subject. SF2 as an entire entity(WW,CE,HF,Super,ST) was a phenomenon and Capcom decided that for the SEQUEL they would ruin SF by making the antithesis of SF2 and calling it a SEQUEL. Are the true meaning of these words making it to your brain or do you just see “I’m I337 cuz I hate 3s dur!”?
Make a decent rebuttal this time.
If you’re still wondering OG means Original Gen or something. AKA Street Fighter 2.
Dude, why do you bother writing these long posts? To make yourself look smart? Cause after I sort through all your bullcrap all I can see from you is your biased opinion. You think Capcom ruined the StreetFighter name by making a new game after 5 SF2 versions and like 4 or 5 Alpha versions, calling it StreetFighter III, and then you didn’t like it cause the game didn’t play like Super Turbo.
Boo. Fucking. Hoo.
Why don’t you rag on the Alpha series while you’re here? Oh wait. You prolly liked playing that one.
Try coming up with some constructive arguments other than “I didn’t like it” next time buddy.
Ah! So you CAN’T read. I’m sorry that I bombarded you with that wall of text(one paragraph). I’ll be more brief for you.
SF2 good, Capcom make more green paper if sequel use winning formula. Capcom no make green paper if fireballs and dps get tapped away. Me no can do crossups no mo cuz enemy tap either way and not get hurt.
All opinions are biased you idiot.
I stop playing Street Fighter III, for all the reasons most people hate it.
However, I can only commend CAPCOM, for trying to recreate their game.
Takes major guts, I guess.
rioting soul, you’re a dumbass. the antithesis of sf2? because they decided to add a parry system and some new characters? maybe you could consider parrying a means to fix issues with projectile spamming. maybe new characters because the old ones were getting a bit stale. what do you think of games with just defense? what is your opinion of the alpha series? BTW, stop misusing vocabulary words and take your own advice and try reading the posts you’re replying to. I expect an equally ignorant reply from you for this post.
this was never a “problem” in sf2 to begin with and even less so in the alpha series and uh pretty much every other fighting game and none of them had to resort to a mechanic that dumbs down the game to achieve it
Well, it was pointless responding to you, you think parrying stuff is like using alpha counters; easy and full proof. Don’t post your opinion as gospel and then insult when you don’t like what others have to say.
And you don’t know shit about SF games, you don’t even know that SSF2 and ST were behind in popularity to Mortal Kombat, the 3D fighters and Killer Instinct at that time. Capcom NOT make green paper with winning formula anymore… dumbass.
Oh and just for your poor memory I recall you said “…because I’m one of the aformentioned 3s haters…” and then later “SF3 simply didn’t live up to SF2’s standard(right now I’m just talking about gameplay).”
My Problem is just that you state YOUR problems with SF3 gameplay as accepted fact.
The reason for that is all the SF before SF3, characters’ offensive option are very limited. But SF3 needs parrying otherwise it would be a really stupid game.
Capcom ruined the greatest game ever by making that shitty sequel. Of course I’m talking about the glitch plagued, unplayable mess that was Street Fighter 2: WW … Why did they mess with the perfection that was the TRUE OG, Street Fighter.
Seriously, shut the fuck up. all of you. SF2 and SF3 can both exist on the same plane of reality and not cause a wormhole or paradox… Calm the fuck down… You don’t like ST? Cool DON’T PLAY IT…You don’t like 3S? COOL DON’T PLAY IT…this is not complicated shit.
OhNoos -
People have a problem with it, particularly the anti-3S group, because the words “Street Fighter” is in the title. Gameplay aside, it’s the actual title that is getting people upset. Just think about that for a moment…
The point I was trying to make is that if you want to claim the OG STREET FIGHTER name then Play Sf1, that’s the original. SF2 was a sequel and was VERY different than the original, so it :wow: MAKES SENSE :wow: that SF3 would be really different than SF2
WOW
AMAZING
ROFL… dude the wormhole exists within this thread and we’re all going to die.
Very limited offensive options in ST? I don’t think so.
The different games simply offer different options… for example 3S has many overheads/unblockable setups, but ST on its side has the very effective fireballs and tick traps.
YOU WERE THE FIRST ONE TO THROW INSULTS.
Actually alpha counters can be baited and punished on reaction(as opposed to guessing if they missed a parry).
You’re making comparisons to games that may have did better based on the sources you have not provided as if that means SF2 wasn’t a large success. “Game X made 50 billion dollars but Game Y made 70 billion so Game X wasn’t successful”. And yeah, I posted that I was a 3s hater so that it was out in the open and there would be no misunderstanding of my tone.
If you believe my opinion on SF3’s gameplay not living up to the SF2 standard is flawed then please explain to me in length how SF3 is more deep than SF2. Or you could just avert the focus of this argument like MANY others before you.
You know, I do this to myself. I know I shouldn’t post in these threads but the call is TOO GREAT FOR ME TO BARE.
If I ever gave off the impression that I am being ignorant then I apologize. From my perspective, you appear to be the ignorant one. It is my belief that SF2 had no issues with projectile spamming as there were already good enough solutions to that problem such as:
-jab dp/Hurricane Kick
-Buffalo Headbutt/Turn Punch
-Lariat/Banishing Flat
-Dee Jay short up kick/Slide
-Blanka Hop/Slide(correct me if I am wrong)
-Dhalsim triangle jump/slide
-T.Hawk Dive
-Honda Butt Smash
-Jumping
-Super
I enjoy just defense because it doesn’t limit offensive options nearly as much but it is still a valuable defensive option. If a player JDs in the air then they are knocked higher into the air. You nullify the attack and receive health, but you are still in potential danger. Also, you get less frame advantage. Not enough to obliterate a guy for doing cr.short, but enough.
I enjoy the Alpha series sans A2 blow out into 70%dmg(Rolento) and A3 infinites.
You seem to be oblivious to the deeper mechanics of SF2 and possibly even SF3, I may be wrong about this but all I can do is continue as if this is the case. If you intend to use O.Sagat as your example of projectile spamming, keep in mind that New Sagat sucks because his Tiger Uppercut was nerfed.
It has nothing to do with the new characters and it isn’t JUST about parry. It’s also the throwing system.
I apologize if that wasn’t ignorant enough for you.
I never said SF3 was more deep than SF2, I don’t think putting a countering system in a game makes it more or less stupid than other games. Do countering systems in other games make them also as ‘less deep’ as ST? Like the Fatal Fury Line System, MOTW’s Just defend, KOF’s Dodge and Rolls, MvC2 Pushblock, SFA3 V-ism Activation, and Guility Gear’s… well everything. Guess SF3 and all of them must be shit, cause… well they aren’t puuure StreetFighter II OG… yeah that’s it.
It sounds fucking ridiculous.
I guess they must be all un-deep games too, because they offer almost universal counters to attacks, instead of JUST blocking, jumping, and specific special/super invinciblity.
its pretty fucking obvious the problem with parry isnt that its a universa defensive option but the ridiculously unbalanced risk/reward it possesses which is pretty much incomparable to anything in any other game