Ryu changes in SSFIV thread

I said might do it. It depends on how much other characters have been buffed, and how bad the nerf is. The supposition is whether Ryu would fall out of the top 3, not whether or not he’s a bad character now. Though having a SRK that doesn’t AA well does not sit well with me, just as it didn’t for Ken users.

Daigo Umehara wasn’t playing Vega either, if I recall. Ryu didn’t win Evo either. Daigo did.

well that’s daigo, and there where only 2 ryu player’s that even made it to the top 8 including Daigo, I wonder what happened to all those other ryu players.

there’s a vid that shows that trade srk in corner to ultra doesn’t connect. also, sagat’s tu can still trade into f.rh ultra anywhere on the screen, but “supposedly” it’s only off of an early trade. i wish i had the vid now… but it’s in a vid of a pirated copy of ssf4.

what the fuck are you talking about

I’m not really sure what to tell you. Ryu is in tourny finals pretty often, there’s nothing to argue here. He’s a good character, deal wit it.

I’d think it was pretty obvious. Daigo won because he’s a good player, not because Ryu’s a good character.

No, there isn’t anything to argue. Define “pretty often”, and exactly what tournaments you’re talking about, and then you’re actually saying something worth anybody’s time. Looking at all the major and local tournaments I see, I don’t see Ryu winning many at all.

Who is it, then, that is winning the rest?

You motherfucker you seriously are not calling Ryu bad. I refuse to believe it.

You lost me here, lol.

SERIOUSLY I AM IN AWE THAT YOU THINK THIS

And I am not going to define “pretty often” for you. He is up there in the tournaments a lot.

with sagat your goal is to avoid playing footsies, you should not have footsies in your game or very few.
just avoiding and dealing with st mk st lk into TS or TK to push back your opponment.

with ryu you have to play footsies, walk forward to able to pressure with cr mk hado cr mk SLS. so you have to care about this part.

with sagat you have to care about avoiding this part…

Do I make sense? :-/

I see a lot of Sagat. I see Rufus if Justin Wong or Marn was involved. In my local scene, we’ve got this beast Ken player that goes by the name of Dr. Chaos. Then there’s this Honda player that calls himself Skye T. Usually it’s one of them, and Philly-One (Cammy), now and again. Sanford Kelly came down to one of our bi-monthlys and bodied us all with Sagat. Him and Andre (Bison).

Ryu’s a great character, but for somebody who’s supposed to be so easy mode powerful, I sure don’t see a whole lot of top players using him, much less winning with him.

Good, because that’s not what I said at all, lol.

This thread has turn to shit.

I think a lot of people don’t use him because he’s so basic to use really, but that’s just me.

And you are repeatedly implying that Ryu isn’t good, which is stupid stupid stupid. He answers for everything and has simple combo potential. And everything.

Been shit a long time. Whenever you get a good discussion in here, in come the naysayers, haters, and trolls. Hell, if it wasn’t for that sticky saying not to create any more character threads, I’d suggest starting a proper thread to talk about Ryu changes, as this one started off on the wrong foot and hasn’t been right since.

Ryu is easy to use and powerful. Who gives a fuck about tournament placings. He doesn’t place top often because everyone knows the Ryu match up best and he has a bad match up with Sagat. Also, No body, or at least me, would try to say that anyone can pick him up and beat someone like Wong.

please can you find me some exemple of ryu in semi final or final of tornament?

and let s see how many result you can find without umehara/ fuudo included…

no body said that ryu suck, we said that ryu is hard to play and bring to hight level. ryu is hard to make result with at hight level.
he have many answer, but not something you can spam or abuse. he have no vortex.

any way i m waiting for tournament result with ryu being in top 8…

Point being “easy to use” is not the same as “easy to win with”. While you can say all you want about him being the former, it doesn’t matter if he’s not the latter, which he definitely isn’t.

Man your quotes are gold.

Thanks a lot. It’s especially golden when it’s true. Like that one you quoted.

dan is easy to use are you saying he’s easy to win with?