X factor isn’t broken because EVERYONE has it. It doesn’t break the game in favour of a certain character (inb4 phoenix, wesker)
Also no one in this thread understands basic logic or english.
Objectively = fact
Subjective = opinion
Btw tell me how akuma isnt broken, Oh wise one. Tell me with your Years of ST knowledge and Hardcore training.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
I don’t think you know what the word “objectively” means. Why don’t you come back after you understand basic English because you come off as incredibly illiterate and ignorant.
We are all laughing at you.
Yeah dude I totally said I don’t think he’s broken. Nice strawman argument man did you graduate with honors from logical fallacy school?
why do you double post?
there is an edit option, use it
Embarassingly I just spent 15 minutes trying to figure out if this turn of the discussion is semiotics or epistemology.
Why do you get mad at strangers with a better grasp of the English language than you?
Nice tangent argument, This is a fighting game discussion forum. Your logic is bs. You don’t know shit about fighting games, Fuck off Eboy.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Is Busta_Woof just really dumb, or a little kid?
The world will never know.
Hes dumb
And he may be a little kid
Lol
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Yes, I’m dumb because I know what “objectively” means.
You’re very aggressive. Just chill your gears.
No your dumb because you have no knowledge on how fighting games work. You have no Real experience Im guessing at that.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
A fallacy, false (and hypocritical) information, and an improper use of the word “we” in the same post.
Go search what “we” means; also, you need to go learn what “illiterate” and “ignorant” means too. If anyone needs to learn English, it would be you.
A (hypocritical [yet again…]) fallacy is in that statement too. Oh, and an example of ignorance in case you don’t know how to search something.
Yet another fallacy, and a completely unrelated one at that.
This person is likely a troll. That could taken as a fallacy too, if you didn’t know.
On topic: Changing the rules of a game tends to not work well. It causes chaos for newcomers, and makes previous research in the meta game less useful.
The only time I believe rules should be changes is if something utterly broken exists, or if it is required for time in a tournament environment.
Catering rules to a person doesn’t seem to have fair reason, even if for balance; for example, Fchamp’s tournament last night changed the balance in UMVC3. This caused people to lose due to unnatural effects such as less meter gain or more time outs (and made even more imbalance in Zero’s favor.)
SRK bumrush ™.
¬¬¬
Anyways, MvC3 under the rules proposed would be an awful slog, probably one we could do without.
At the very least it would widen the gap between the good and bad characters. And that gap is already pretty big.
You’re assuming I don’t think ST Akuma is broken (I do) because I said someone could make an argument he isn’t.
Seriously, learn to read.
I loled at “your dumb” by the way.
laughing my ass off at all the jelly haters tbh
Great, so everybody has access to a broken mechanic. That doesn’t make it any less broken, and that doesn’t change the fact that its risk/reward ratio is beyond retarded. Something being broken isn’t just simple imbalances between characters.
Ok, go pinch yourself.
I’d say it makes it much less broken. It’s a little easier to come to a consensus on banning something when its a single character that is unchallenged by the rest, but if you’re just removing a game mechanic that affects every character equally, its more a matter of taste. Maybe you can still call it broken since “broken” is just kind of a catch all term for things people don’t like.