I5-3470 3.2 ghz
8gb RAM
Gtx 960 OC 2gb
Sadly i preordered game on November 1st so didnt get to check the game on this setup. Think that will work just fine but will report my exp as soon as i get chance to try it out.
I will keep an eye on this since my setup will be similar, should run max no problem I am hoping.
What was your settings and FPS? Did you OC your GPU?
resolution 1080p
res scaling: 90
display depth: far
AA: high
PP: low
shadow: High
texture: recommended
efects: low
no over clock 60 fps except on the waterfall stage with chunlis critical art.
I think you can still play with the settings. but I dont know which settings are for cpu or gpu.
Feel free to tell me I’m wrong, but this laptop might be able to run SFV on medium settings.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834152777
Nope. The processor is 2.4ghz and the video card has 2 GB’s of video memory.
Minimum should be at least 3.0ghz processor and any card that has 3 GB’s video memory in addition to 8 GIGS of RAM.
I play ARMA 3, H1Z1, Arc and games like that. I can’t tell you the last time my VRAM usage was over 90%. Wouldn’t that mean that games aren’t utilizing over 2 gigs of VRAM? so why would anyone need 3? There are a few exceptions like Shadow of Mordor and AC games, outside of that 2 VRAM seems fine. Am I just not understanding something. Don’t buy a 4 gig vram card that is something mid level like 760, 960 ect ect. you are better offed spending that money on a 970 or something.
The price difference between 2 and 4 gigs of VRAM is to large and the gain just isn’t worth it. This is all at gaming at 1080p/1440p of course. This video explains it perfectly. 2 gigs of VRAM is more than enough for SF5 at 1080p. However as games become more complex and what not than yea you may need more… but most high end video cards start at 3-4 gigs anyway.
I have another computer with a celeron g540 2.5ghz and a gtx 660 and I get 60fps
settings:
resolution 1080p
res scaling: 100
display depth: high
AA: medium
PP: low
shadow: High
texture: recommended
effects: low
Summary
Operating System
Windows 8.1 64-bit
CPU
Intel Core i3/i5/i7 4xxx @ 2.50GHz
Haswell 22nm Technology
RAM
24.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz (11-11-11-28)
Motherboard
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. G751JY (SOCKET 0)
Graphics
Generic PnP Monitor (1920x1080@60Hz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M (ASUStek Computer Inc)
Storage
238GB SAMSUNG MZHPU256HCGL-00004 (SSD)
931GB Hitachi HGST HTS721010A9E630 (SATA)
Optical Drives
MATSHITA BD-MLT UJ272 S
Audio
Realtek High Definition Audio
Edit: I’m **not **getting 980m lag like users have said above
AMD FX 8350 4.0GHz processor
Crucial 8GB RAM
Gigabyte GTX 960 Graphics card
Runs flawlessly on Recommended/Max settings. The black market version of the game I’m playing seems to run better than the previous version I was playing on. Probably optimized it. If the PC beta is still available I’ll purchase the game soon since I do like the bit of upgrade in the fidelity on PC. Still will probably mainly play on PS4 either way.
I think it’s the fact that the beta had to be connected to the internet in order to let you play. So I attribute any slowdown I experienced in Beta 2 to my connection or Capcom’s servers.
My specs
The proc is balls and the RAM isn’t the highest end, but I can still play at pretty high settings.
You can probably OC the ram very easily. Thats pretty slow.
It should actually be at 1066 so I dunno why it’s that slow. Didn’t even notice until today. But I am in Europe now so I’ll have to take a look one I’m back later this month.
Can anyone please post 2 things.
1)usf iv framerate using the in game benchmark vs
2)your same resolution sfv Benchmark or fps with similar quality settings.
Thanks!!!
I dunno why that would matter. SFV requires more hardware and the recommended specs have been release.
Well I have the sfiv benchmark tool, but haven’t had a chance to test sfv yet, so a simple comparison of a few peoples numbers will give me a rough performance ratio so I may be able to estimate how it will run so we can be best prepared.
And of course since this is a street fighter message board, most have the sfiv benchmark as opposed to something like 3dmark.
Well SF4 requirement are pretty low. Even my laptop can run it at 60FPS. PS4 isnt a powerhouse, recommended specs are pretty solid.
You can’t really compare the two.
I run like 260 fps on the SFIV benchmark with all settings maxed out and get 60 fps on medium settings in SFV which goes down during cinematics. Higher graphics settings are unplayable.
Hey guys I tried the beta with an Amd Phenom II 965 quad core 3.4 with a gtx 960 and it works 60fps on ultra.
I tought the phenom was too old so I ordered a new one then a friend of mine lended me a 960 to test it out.