If you’re getting 3-4 frame drops please don’t play online.
Your personal fps has no affect on the other player I don’t think
It’s your latency/connection
You most likely played against people with 5+ frame drops and didn’t even noticed it
3-4 frame drops is barely noticeable either way
only time you’ll actually notice it is most likely when you drop your 3f links
that is, with a 60fps rate
Fps has effect on both players, latency/connection makes it rollback teleport, fps under 60 feels like slow motion there’s a clear difference and I noticed both playing the beta.
Exactly, if you are planning to play the game below 60FPS. Just leave the forum and dont buy the game. We dont want you. Go join COD.com forums or something.
Nice
No its not nice, its rather annoying. You joined 3 days ago and you already half assing your version of SFV.
I have a gtx 970 and run the game max settings
I have experienced it with the 750ti and the only thing noticeable was the graphics and occasional frame drops
But I’ll entertain you
So what if I’m playing with occasional 3-4 frame drops
So are plenty of other people
Name me one fighting game you NEVER had issues and played 100% online matches perfect frame rate and connection
What isn’t cool is you shooing people away from the community possibly hindering its growth and revenue because of a measly occasional 3 frame drop
And then telling them to join another forum that has NOTHING to do with what is discussed here
By the way
Ps4 also has occasional frame drops
3 and even 5 frames
You gonna tell the ps4 players to go join the cod.com forum too?
An account way older than mine and you want to treat people who want to join the scene and community like shit
Nice indeed
Well im not entertaining shit. Dont friend me and dont play me online. I bet you im not the only one that feels this year.
yea my account is old, one of the main reasons I refuse to deal with players like you that treat this as if this was COD. Its not, GTFO with your frame drops.
If you look at the history of this thread you will find me helping lots of other players achieve 60FPS locked. I dont have time for those that dont care.
Up to you to d/c if we get matched then
I wonder if you dc the moment you see any sort of frame drop since you’re so adamant about it here
I understand no one wants frame drops especially in a fighting game
You’re going to play against it regardless
It’s even going to happen on ps4
That’s no reason to tell people to go away or don’t get the game even at an occasional 3 frame drop(same as ps4)
Good talking
I severely doubt that frame drops slow down the game for either player when played online. I’m not sure about slowdowns but I got them fighting PS4 players as well so I’d have to label that as a connection issue. The PS4 version didn’t maintain perfect 60 FPS in one of the previous beta builds, either, so that’s more evidence of performance not causing slow downs (people would have complained).
No I wouldn’t buy an Alienware tower , that’s just burning money. I mean a regular PC tower here in Aus with respectable specs ( I’m not interested in going cheap) is around $1500, add monitor , and the rest and I’m up to $1800-1900. I don’t have time to build my own.
The initial point was though I wanted a laptop that was comparable to the GTX960 desktop. Or I was looking for someone that played the beta on a 965M laptop to see if it ran well ( since that card runs in cheaper than a 970).
In the end I might just settle for PS4 for now to be honest. It seems like a large gamble to take before the game is released, if the game has problems on PC or doesn’t become competitive, it’s a large outlay.
I might give it a month or two to see how the communities develop.
He said he wanted a laptop. You can get a custom laptop at iBuypower for cheaper than Alienware with better hardware. When I snagged my laptop from iBuypower it had an 8GB GTX 880M available, Alienware was charging more money the 4GB version. Up until recently, I travelled a lot. I needed a beastly laptop to game on. Plus traveling with a laptop and arcade stick is easier than travelling with a console. I ended up snagging this in 2014. Still runs anything I want well.
Full HD 1920x1080 LED-Backlit Display
Intel Core i7-4810MQ Mobile Processor (4x 2.8GHz/6MB L3 Cache)
24GB [8GB x 3] 1866MHz DDR3 SO-DIMM Laptop Memory - G.SKILL Ripjaws
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M 8GB GDDR5 Video w/ NVIDIA Optimus
256 GB ADATA SX900 SSD
1 TB Laptop Solid State Hybrid Drive with 64MB Cache
A PC running the game slowly would probably cause similar rollback/lag. Something worth testing when the game comes out. But I would doubt that something smaller, like a 3-4fps drop, would even be noticeable.
But, same here: I ran into what mostly seemed to be network issues (from PS4 players) during the beta, as opposed to suspected hardware issues.
GGPO-type netcode depends on uploading data and not super fast download speed. People like to brag about how fast their connections are, but if they’re uploading something in the background (or streaming), they may be negatively affecting their ping.
Also, console players are much more likely to be playing on wifi, which is worse than a wired connection.
It’s ok , I’ve noticed among the PC community when anyone asks for advice on laptops, they tell you to buy a desktop lol
How does that 880m run SF5? Get away with medium?
If you need the mobility of a laptop, it doesn’t matter much better of a value a desktop is. I wish people would think about that before they tell someone looking for a laptop to “buy a desktop.”
not many r290x users on here it seems. i’d really like to know if my card runs it at 1440p maxed before i buy a new monitor. am running 1080p currently and thats fine.
Can you buy a monitor, test it, and return it?
Amd graphics cards get real hot and consume a lot of power
When the game comes out, use the AMD VSR feature to render at 1440p and display at 1080p. If it works fine, native 1440p should also work, I think.
http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/VSR.aspx
My guess is that a 290x will be totally fine for 1440p, but I’m not certain that it will be at fully maxed out settings because no one really seems to know the performance impact of every setting yet. There could also be settings that have a large performance impact, but that doesn’t impact the visuals much, which makes it pointless to even run the game on max.
A GTX 960/R9 380 level card can run a maxed 1080p, but 1440p is like 75% more pixels. A 290x is not 75% more powerful than a 380 for example, more like 30-40%. On the other hand, that kind of logic presumes that a 380 actually struggles at 1080p, and I never checked that when I ran the beta.
And, even if 1440p doesn’t run 100% perfectly, you can downsample within the game itself. Say 90% of 1440p is much better than 1080p anyway.
Im a 290 user and I can run the game at 4k.