fixed
Max Brooks isn’t 5’4".
Sent from my Adderall, using Tapatalk 2
Fixed.
he’s also not smart enough to know that dead bodies don’t breathe so they can’t contract muscles. i am though. that’s why i didn’t write that book.
also that’s why i’m poor as fuck.
That, and you have a particular ethic that you hold yourself to, regarding your stick and PC sales.
Else you’d be a powerhouse combination of Akihabarashop and Rabbit’s PC co.
Sent from my Adderall, using Tapatalk 2
[media=youtube]L1o-9EWGbjQ[/media]
i’ll probably still watch this though. matineeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
datz true. you could say i’m a slow zombie when it comes to that stuff. Rabbit is a fast zombie wrecking shit and making tsunamis an shyt.
NOT THAT THERE’S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT! WE ARE ALL DIFFERENT!
Because the effects haven’t gone thru final post-processing.
- :bluu:
Yeah but zombies in general have alot of physical explanations. As well one cou;ld say that ‘noise’ they make is an exhale, which owuld mean they inhale at some point.
- :bluu:
I dn’t care about hte book as I never read it and didn’t even know it existed shrug. It does look like 28 Days later on coke…and thus I am interested. Would the movie become more appealing if the name simply changed?
- :bluu:
Woooooow. He sold out worse than I thought!
Sheeeeiii… I would too if someone air dropped giant bags of money on my front yard.
yeah, that’s true. part of the horror/paradox is that they shouldn’t be able to move for normal reasons (their hearts don’t beat; coagulated blood; muscles rotted away; etc) implying supernatural influence. i read part of the Zombie Survival guide and this dude was talking about zombieziez like they were explainable through scientific means. now, i didn’t finish the book so i don’t know if he switched positions later on.
and 28 Days Later people weren’t zombies. on the surface that sounds snobbish as hell, but the “rage-infected” people in the movie weren’t dead. the title 28 Days Later relates to how long it takes a rage-infected human to starve to death.
So judging by that trailer this will be nothing like the book, right? I’ll pass.
Since the only thing this movie has in common with the book is the title then I would have to say yes. It’s like slapping a toyota logo on a mercedes: it doesn’t make sense and it is utterly pointless.
it’s more like slapping a Mercedes logo on one of these:
http://www.thatsmycrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Yugo-JPEG.jpg
UM BRITISH GUY IN THAT YOUTUBE THING, 28 DAYS LATER ISN’T A ZOMBIE MOVIE.
Fucking people who think they like zombie movies making me put my nerd hat on and dorking it up.
The book was good, movie looking really stupid doesn’t make the book any less good. Oh well!
I don’t think anyone here is disputing that unless I missed something.
The movie is PG-13. I can’t think of one other zombie movie that is PG-13. GOT FUCKING DAMMIT I HATE HOW AMERICANS RATE MOVIES (or allow freedom of speech to be ass fucked by the ratings system, which should merely be a reminder rather than a law permitting who can/can’t see a flick). Hence you have zombies with barely any body damage or decay.
Anywho, for fast vs slow zombies, it should all matter with how fucked up they are, physically. Look at Dawn of the Dead remake. They did fast zombies damn well, as well as shuffling ones. Some zombies in Walking Dead move mighty fast, depending on the plot.
I’ll check this movie out, but I don’t have high hopes. Especially after all the bullshit that went on (Brad Pitt not talking to the director, getting pushed back almost a full year, etc etc)
Looks better then “Man with the Iron fist”
No freedom of speech is being suppressed. What are you on about? Studios decide on a rating for two reasons: what they can get away with and what will get the largest audience. The board that chooses the rating for films is inconsistent and that’s been proven throughout the years, so they can’t be sure if a movie will get an R rating or an NC-17 rating. And even before that (or around the same time) they pull in figures and data from marketing to see who is the target audience for the film. It makes sense for this to be PG-13 because teenage males love these genres.
And it isn’t a law, it’s an agreed-upon set of rules between the ratings board, the film studios, and movie theaters. Movie theaters don’t have to show ratings if they don’t want to.
This movie is terrible for the simple reason that I applied to be an extra in it but was too busy with college to be able to go to any interviews or whatever.
On that subject, many parts of the film were shot directly outside of my college. This meant I had to take an alternative route to get to the building half of the bloody time which meant I WAS ALWAYS LATE WHICH MEANT I GOT NO BREAK ASJDFSBHJFBSD:FJBSDFHB fuck this movie
Naw the Motion Picture Association of America’s rating system really is bullshit. You should check out this documentary about it.