They really shouldn’t have got banned or deleted in all honesty, imo. The whole point of day 1 tier lists is that they are day 1 tier lists- I don’t think anybody would be arrogant enough to say they are set in stone or won’t become horrifically outdated, it’s just a way of documenting how the game progresses and what’s currently effective. This matters to an awful lot of people, including top tournament players. Seriously, some of the best players I have ever known ask straight away when a game comes out what’s cheap and what’s winning, then take things from there- whether that’s exploiting it or trying to take it down.
It’s constructive to look at a thread as see “oh, right now Sentinal and Phoenix are rinsing” because then you can come up with anti-Phoenix strats, or if you like that kind of thing, take up Sentinal and Phoenix. Likewise if everyone thinks Thor sucks, there are those who will try and expose this guys strengths and ‘invent’ tournament Thor.
Long story short there is never ‘too early’ a time to do tier lists. They just need to be done by credible people. A list by someone with no history of competitive play based on what he’s seen on youtube and XBL on day 1 is useless, unless it prompts credible discussion.
It’s a shame that SRK started a few months after MVC2 came out (marvel came out mid march 2000 for DC and arcade in Japan, SRK was online by around June and the forums started to get busy around Autumn of that year) so looking through the archive won’t see any really early days tiering, which imo is a shame. I for one would love to see those old posts whining about Iceman/Cable/Guile being an unbeatable team and Anakaris coffins being broken.