Ain’t nobody mad. However if you look like a twink, sportin armani v-necks with glasses hangin off the collar you are setting yourself up for failure. I put my sunglasses in my woman’s purse. I ain’t carrying around shit.
Teaching game has absolutely nothing to do with dehumanizing women. It’s a erroneous conflation we would see from a intellectually vacant click bait SJW article.
I meant there’s nothing anyone can do to prevent these types of incidents from occurring in general. How do you expect the Police to catch the next mass murderer who doesn’t post a retribution video on youtube?
I treat shades like goggles. Keep em close to my face until they actually need to be on my face. Keep em in my girls purse? Wtf I ain’t 4, she probably keeps napkins in there to wipe your ass for you too, baby boy.
I’m quite aware of what it is. You’re the one misinforming the motives of teaching game and asserting a irrelevant point about teaching the idea that women are people which is a point no one ever argued against nor remotely implied differently.
Pro tip Its not a good idea to talk outta ones ass.
I don’t understand why teaching men how to deal with women on a personal level would be a bad thing. You.would think women would want men to.put.more.effort.into being cultured or whatever.
Anybody else tried of hearing the word ‘misogyny’ when you say something about women that they don’t like? As if women are above criticism, I’m sick of it. Seriously, fuck women. They’re not special.
We all hear about the ‘war rape’ that goes on supposedly (by soldiers by the way, not regular guys on the street) but stuff like this is forgotten. Here’s another take on ‘war rape’ that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwgObasFkKo
Game implies that you are trying to conquer whatever trivialities are in front of you in order to score a prize, in this instance the woman you are talking to. Why not just talk to her as a person? That’s worked way more than anyone trying to come up with a power play like you’re trying to win the Stanley Cup.
Nothing that I posted is strawman. All I said is speak to women like people, not objects.
There’s some truth to this quote: ‘No men who really think deeply about women retain a high opinion of them; men. either despise women or they have never thought seriously about them.’ – Otto Weininger
Despise might be too strong a word but nevertheless when you think about women seriously you find more negatives than you do positives. Especially nowadays.
And dude, people are allowed to ‘hate’ whatever they want to. Just because someone hates something that is no reason to dismiss them. No less than it is to dismiss a game review because the reviewer doesn’t like the game. Women are not special in this regard. Maybe they have valid reasons for their ‘hatred’? How would you even know if you dismiss them immediately?
The objective in game is to get laid. Women being the gatekeepers of sex means that men have to actually"work"in order to get sex. At no point does this dehumanize or diminish a women’s value. That is a conflation you are interjecting that is not reflecting what is being said or taught.
In the same way we have advice on how to ace job interviews or make a good impression with co-workers, we also have advice on how to get women. Your logic suggest any guidance to navigate through any human relationship of any capacity instantly ignores the subjects humanity…this is beyond irrational and above all else fucktardish.
Nobody has time to go searching your netsploits bro, you get no argument from me that women are easy. This “They need to be treated as human beings” is garbage because when you actually do treat them as people and humans you are a “Misogynist asshole” and “How could you, shes a girl” bullshit.
So which is it? Are they people or are they delicate flowers meant to be put under glass and idolized?