The actors took the subject matter very seriously. They know 1 out of 2 girls who game are used for leveling up.
https://vine.co/v/OUpqnP1J9Wq
Speaking of mask, why the fuck does âbriannaâ look like the female version of Rocky Dennis?
Edit: You mothefukkas really donât kno who that is?
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/50312_2257526613_5213_n.jpg
Are those breast implants or stuffed bra?
Brian used to be a dude.
I wonder if his plastic surgeon just weeps every time he sees this atrocity on television.
what happened to revolution 60? i cant find it anywhere anymore.
praise the sun !
SVU doesnt have to be your cop show. SVU is over.
Turns out âBrianna Wuâ is really one John Flynt, and was described as a âcreepy dudeâ and sociopathic liar who âhad glasses, a scraggly beard, hair always looked like shit and wore bluejeans and a denim jacket every. fucking. day.â Lots of other hilarious factoids in the latest Milo piece;
This is shit we already know to a large degree and there is an ED page on it already. I also consider Miloâs article no better than if the antis did a hit piece on a prominent GG supporter such as TotalBiscuit. Really no different, if weâd condemn one, we should condemn another. I donât see the point of this. We should focus on unethical behavior within gaming, development, and blogging/media reporting on gaming. If it was unethical in the past but had nothing to do with gaming, then whatâs the point? Everyone has done something shitty at some point, Iâm sure not one of us can sit here and claim we didnât write something stupid on the net at one point in our lives.
IMO, rather than write articles to make someone look bad, why not sit back and let them make themselves look bad instead? Thatâs been working perfectly fine for the last 6 months. Iâd rather that, than see us cheer for something I have to ask myself, âis it ethical?â
Edit: And let me make it clear, I definitely consider the subject matter to be a piece of shit, just like #1 and #2 and I donât think either deserves any sort of success, recognition, or anything like that. I like seeing pieces of shit get whatâs coming to them, if that ever happens considering there are plenty of pieces of shit out there reaping in success. I simply donât agree with using a media platform to make that happen.
Never let your enemies dictate what youâre allowed to say or in this case, write about.
Thatâs just silly, because you can throw that logic at GG and our demands for a more ethical and objective press. You can apply that logic as weâre trying to dictate what they can and canât write about.
Miloâs article is garbage. Why the focus on BoohWoo now? âOh hey, look, some old ass forum posts from 7 years ago proving a lunatic is a lunatic!â Yeah, we know itâs a lunatic, it reminds those of us who use Twitter every day. âHey look, BoohWoo was being a jerk and treating people like shit!â If it looks like a duck⌠I get that we had the whole Greenlight situation, the developer forum censoring, a few blog posts here and there by the darlings about R60 making it to Steam, but the article focused on none of the stuff relevant to us and was posting old forum posts as if they were newsworthy.
Again, if I have to sit back and ask myself if the behavior in front of me is ethical, then chances are, it isnât.
Maybe itâs for good measure:
Letâs say for argumentâs sake Brianna Wu was born a man; so what? What is your point, what does this have to do with ethics in video games? It seems to me youâre only using this to attack Brianna for transphobic reasons. If gamergate is truly against transphobia, it would condemn these pathetic attacks.
This is no different from saying âoh you know milo, he likes men, heâs a gayâ in an attempt to attack and somehow discredit it and just as immature.
Lmao ash trying to claim the FGC/SRK are transphobicâŚthatâs like trying to claim black men hate white women.
SRK/FGC love trans more then SJWsâŚand when I say love I mean in ways that would scare most people.
.
Absolutely, and I wish more GGâers made the same logical connection you just did. Game journalists and gaming SJWs despise GamerGaters to the core, and will never be âconvincedâ or do anything they ask, no matter how reasonable.
And yet, GamerGaters are supposed to play by the rules the SJWs set? Thatâs lunacy.
In fact, that aspect of GamerGate strikes me as utterly useless. The meaningful part of GamerGate is going after the advertisers, boycotting the sites, (those last two encouraging editorial shifts for these sites which then seeps into the writing itself) and spreading our message to people who arenât virulent SJWs. And the latter involves exactly the kind of attack article Milo wrote about John/âBriannaâ, exposing his lies and sociopathic behavior.
By the way, this is exactly why InternetAristocrat became disillusioned with the GamerGate movement.
You didnât actually read the article, did you? The article was about the hypocrisy, cruelty, and sociopathic lies of Brianna/âJohnâ. His being a transexual was only relevant within the context of belittling/bullying other transexuals, refusing to inform sexual partners of his sexual status, claiming to represent womenâs views, etc.
https://twitter.com/CJBK/status/566323231163162625
Re: Wu and Milo. Itâs pointless to try policing what others say. âGamergate should condemn âŚblah blah blahâ; âPeople shouldnât say/focus on âŚblah blah blah.â You have no control over any of that.
See the above by bodom is exactly what i meant Sennin.
I donât see how the article is anything other than an attack against someone for being trans.
While yâall are arguing about trannies and shit with morons, Rock, Paper, Shotgun went IN on Peter Molyneuxâs lying ass:
Like, Iâm sure theyâre only doing it because Molyneux is no longer âprotectedâ by his media cronies and connections, but damn if they didnât ask the questions EVERYONE has been wanting to ask this shyster-ass motherfucker.