Who the fuck is “beating you over the head” with it? All everyone is doing is posting on a thread in a forum that’s about the game they are talking about. Did someone spam your mailbox? Called you on the phone? Violated the forum rules? I don’t even recall ever talking to you before this thread.
See, some people don’t mind arguing about video games, but if you get so angry from it, why do you keep reading?
Karate Champ is the shit, yo.
Why would anyone look at it from that viewpoint and call themselves a competitive player?
If a game was as easy as they try to make it out to be, wouldn’t everyone be a competitive player?
Depends on what your definition of competitive is. As long as you can press buttons while blocking that can be “competitive”
If games were build to be made easy, you have every player competing and rooms would be sold out in 3 seconds. (Not literally)
Let’s not hope that the mentality of easy is button mashing.
Just because you lose a lot at them doesn’t mean anyone can compete. Just practice up.
Competitive as in tourney viable.
Because it’s important to understand how others think.
Especially given how massively people misinterpret others motivations
Sent from my Radar 4G using Board Express
I don’t know much about Karate Champ, but isn’t he the one of the biggest trash talkers in the FGC? Not trying to bash anyone, just heard he was.
WWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
[media=youtube]vU5OO4q8lSg[/media]
Lol…that’s Filipino Champ.
People DO want a modern sequel with better graphics, but not if it comes with a game that’s worse than the original. And people have no faith that modern Capcom can pull it off.
Because it’s exciting to get a new video game, period. (And that even includes aesthetics!)
It’s a factor that has nothing to do with winning or losing. When the game attracts you, you don’t even care when you lose- You are still having fun.
That’s exactly what VF is missing, to answer your other post. It doesn’t have that factor that people look at it and say "I want to play this."
I’d be lying if I said the fun in Guilty Gear doesn’t come ALSO from how the game looks.
So in summary aesthetics ARE important but they do not compensate for a bad game.
Which is why fighting games always need to get sequels, but ones that improve the game, not make it worse.
If you can move up one spot in a tourney bracket in any fighter that’s pretty much tourney viable. It’s more a matter of how far in the bracket you’re trying to go that really matters. Most any fighting game is easy enough where you can move up one spot in the bracket in a tournament.
The only way you can be “tourney unviable” is by literally being so bad that you would lose to every single person in a multiple hundred man tournament if you played them in a round robin. That’s pretty much impossible.
Yeah not everyone can be top 3 major tournament viable…but otherwise pretty much regardless of game if you put the work in you can be “tourney viable”. It’s almost impossible to be so incompetent that you literally can not win matches in tournament. That’s just a lack of dedication.
Didn’t they make it worse with SFIV? I would have still prefer SF3, I don’t know why, the gameplay style is so different and technical, while SFIV = ST + 3D graphic style gameplay. Well, that’s my mentality of it, I could be wrong because my style of play is different.
No offense to the people you play, but, if you guys are running serious sets, and you beat them, then they should practice more.
There’s no real excuse for losing a set to someone who doesn’t play the game when you do.
why are you even answering to that waste of time of idiot who likes to make troll accounts to post stupid shit?
This.
Beating people at your local GameStop doesn’t mean you’re anywhere near decent.
But it’s a step in the direction they want to go I guess.
All the things he posts I’ve seen in the past already posted by real legitimate users so what’s the difference?
Besides, I find it entertaining, at least for now.