gOddamn phone eating posts, I’ll catch up tomorrow
(and then it shows up)
One of you told me in the better fighting game thread that you prefer to call it something else.
It just so happens you live in the same city as I.
I think a hype match would be seeing these underdogs and unknown players beating these top 8-16 types.
Idk why people are still using terms like “worse” “fun” “better” “competitive”, etc. while passing off their opinion of games as an objective one.
Makes no sense at all to me.
Ppl who are doing this are either dumass elitist that have their heads sooo far up their own asses that they feel any game thats not in thier lane is automatically bad, or scrubs who suck at newer games and are quick to blame the game rather than their incompetence to tackle something new/original.
Idk man, it seems to me the “OG’S” are the most childish of the bunch.
TSk TSK TSK.
What’s better and/or more hype?
VQ3 + CPM or CS 1.6?
Dark souls nuff nuff
It’s a discussion board. We discuss shit, don’t click the topic if you don’t want to talk about it.
These topics would be better if people stop used the “you don’t like these new games because you’re bad at them”. That’s like the “well, you’re stupid” comeback.
ya we can discuss opinions, without passing em off as fact. You can discuss what u like/dislike but passing it off as something more is chilidish and pretentious.
A discussion board doesnt give excuse for childishness(well maybe this one cuz this board is full of pretentious children)
Lack of stream hype doesn’t kill games, people keeping their ass in the house do.
That depends on the games/series. Quake and Unreal Tournament say “hi!”.
Your right x-factor isn’t an instant win button. X-factor is a near instant win button. Bwahahaha try again.
http://twitchtvfaces.com/images/Kappa.png
No, it’s not. It’s MvC3 where everybody has MvC2 juggernaut’s damage output! Oh, and you have lv2 or lv3 x-factor! :smokin:
Yeah, well I don’t even need to close the tray to play SFxT. PS3 >>> 360
Does someone really need to type “IMO” or “In my opinion” for the reader to know it’s an opinion?
Shwaffles reminded me of a post I wanted to reply to:
FIGHTING GAMES AREN’T HARDER THAN OTHER GAMES
Every game has nuances you can learn to get better or make the game easier. Look at speed-runs and no save runs or whatever. Look at people learning maps and spawn spots and item locations. Look at execution techniques to reload faster or make yourself harder to shoot/hit, or increase your movement speed or APM and micro.
Fighting game players are not Jedis.
[media=youtube]Je1J4TxldPY[/media]!
[media=youtube]ORgSuIIesIE[/media]
I think majority of the way is to watch, study, and practice, that’s how you improve, of course, entering local tourneys. Because I’m sure if you don’t have anyone to tell you what to do, you won’t improve much.
let me put it this way
HnK is damn Hype, is extremely fun, and i love to play it when i have the opportunity, despite that i know that the game is not really good, in fact i could easily say that its kinda trashy, has really dumb stuff outside the obvious glitches that come from oversights and what the hell where they thinking mechanics, for competitive play is not the better option, yes you can still compete on it (anything can be competitive as long as there is people willing to compete on it)
i feel that we can be objective on what makes a fg good or not despite if we like said game or not
(and before peope come at me saying that its subjective, no there are points that arent subjective, there are stuff that you can use to measure quality, and im not talking about presentation or production values)
i love hnk and know that the game is not good
i have fun on sfxt, but i know that the game has a lot of flaws mechanic wise, gameplay wise, and design wise that simply take away any possible good point that the game could have
i dont like 3s, but i know that outside its balance problem the game is good, not the best, but has strong points and solid ideas, yes i hate how parry is implemented on 3s, but i understand that the game was build around it and that contrary to popular belief, there is still zoning on the game, just that it doesnt work the same as other sf game
there are people whit legitimate reasons to dislike the games, not just because they are not liking, but because they notice a trend on how some aspects of what made older games good are becoming absent on those new releases
i agree that there are a lot of idiots that label something as bad just because they dont like it though, this is specially true for a lot of people who simply dont understand or know enough the games that they criticize
Thats what Im not getting? What are flawed mechanics but an unpreferred design/mechanic?
Ppl like to say that the jabs are a problem, but objectively its not, all it is is something not preferable.
Whats an example of this objectivity you speak of. Also I’m also of the belief alot of the opinions on sfxt is a result of ignorance on how the game works, not to mention that its 2 months old.
Can I ask, is mvc 2 a bad game in the objective stance you speak of?
OP: why doesnt sfxt get more stream views? 
thread: because it sucks 
Sho Nuff: it sucks JUST TO YOU
http://z4.ifrm.com/30153/94/0/e5100091//e5100091.gif
shoultz: no, it sucks, vsav is a billion times better, learn to play it :nono:
ITT: the movie
So then how do you feel about the “you only play newer games because you suck at the old ones” line of thinking?
Everyone should be playing Guilty Gear
shit generates mad hype when things get crazy
even when it doesn’t get crazy it still generates a lot of hype
the only thing that i know is that with GGXXAC+R and P4U i have enough to be happy for a long time :rock:
Hopefully P4A will keep my attention. It looks fun as hell.