There was no problem with GG license and the music it had the same composer as GG.
It look like aeons for Goku to get one ball. And always something happened that seemed to delay the storyline so as to fill in more chapters or the like. Say, I will make a story of myself getting a slice of bread at the kitchen. If it was OG Dragon Ball, I’d drop it, something would take the slice and run away, then I’d have to fight it for the slice.
Dude, do not pretend to be an idiot if you are not. Everyone knows what it means, but it ends up meaning their style and their tradition. Manga is supposedly just “comic books”, just like Italian “fumetti”. Or “cartoon” animation. Each school has it tradition and that is what the name stands for outside those countries. That is why, if someone from Australia goes buy some mags, he may say “I’m gonna pick some fumetti for myself and a couple of manga books for my son” and he will be understood.
Edit: that Berserk show looks Japanese from a mile away. WTF.
What.
And same composer doesn’t mean anything, I got plenty of albums where you can at least hear inspirations from multiple genres.
No, this is wrong. There’s even been talks about reviving Guilty Gear. It wasn’t a sequel. It was a replacement. They’re very different things.
But it’s like comparing apples to oranges. They’re different games. If they were similar, I could see the comparison, e.g. Don’t play Fatal Fury 1 because there’s Street Fighter 2. BlazBlue and Guilty Gear are very different games, and if you don’t think so, you’ve never played either extensively enough to realize that. There’s some similiarities, yes, but the designer of the games is the same overall. There’s only so much you can do with the, “First to lose their lifebar loses” formula that exists in fighting games these days.
Because they aren’t filled with “weeaboish” characters and hated for it, on the contrary, they are quite popular. Maybe not to play, since they are quite poorly balanced, but the general opinion of the games, design-wise, is positive (right?). What I’m saying is that they have never been discriminated on, at least not for the reasons listed in the first post.
Wait, which game is poorly balanced? Not Guilty Gear… Accent Core is one of the most balanced fighters ever made. I mean, sure Reload was a Sol/Slayer show with the occasional Johnny and Eddie, and Accent Core can be a Testament/Potemkin show at times, but the series isn’t close to Capcom imbalance.
Tried AH3, didn’t like it because there weren’t enough testosterone oozing manly men. Also tried BB CT, didn’t like it because lol Nu.
Does Alpha 2 count as an anime fighter? It looks like anime, plus it even ties in a little with the Alpha Generations anime. Anyway, I love me some HnK and JoJo.
I’m talking about JJBA and HnK.
Oh, definintely agreed there… but if anything got the anime thing right, it was those games. Though… JJBA is a REALLY complex game and turns a lot of people off.
What? HnK isn’t filled with weeabooish characters?
Never mind weeaboo can do nothing about anime, but the overpowered protagonist who’s morally superior than anyone else, despite generally doing the same shit to his villains? The wise and noble old martial artist? The constant filler, monologues, and slight of chauvinism? The new techniques pulled out the maker’s ass? Heck, its basically the groundwork for almost every battle comic after it, it should be weeaboo alpha omega. I love me some HnK and Jojo too but to imply they don’t come from the same tree is just plain silly.
You mean a…SPIRITUAL sequel?
I was talking about arcana, and no it really says nothing for the person who’s viewing what the game is showing you visually. It doesn’t say anything for the guy who can look past the aesthetics either, the op asked why there is discrimination vs anime games, and that’s probably 80% of it
Hell kof is a great game but it doesn’t make yuri’s shirt exploding any less stupid
You didn’t play Arcana in the first place then.
There’s a load of blatant stuff, but pinpoint what’s actually there.
Jojo’s is always evolving.
[media=youtube]9rmeQzB6qm0[/media]
No, I mean a replacement. Other than some of the gameplay aspects and the composer, they share virtually nothing else. Guilty Gear was replaced by Blazblue, and other than that, they’re nothing to do with each other.
The… fuck… This game is so fucking complex… I swear… Nobody knows anything about this game…
The quotation marks were there for a reason. They don’t have the same kind of that fanservicey-loli-type shit, and no schoolgirls/boys or other characters that are seen as, well, “weeaboish” (I guess Jotaro IS a schoolboy, but surely not the kind you’d find in one of those highscool drama-type animes). Don’t know how to say it other than that, they’re… manly? Point is, they are Anime Fighting Games, but not discriminated against in the way the OP says, so the term used is too unspecific. So I’m not saying they’re not part of the same tree, however, maybe you should specify if you’re talking about leaves or fruit, if you catch my drift.
I believe someone said before most are just a fan of Street Fighter or Mortal Kombat, not a fan of the genre, so bashing is a natural defense.
I have access to the development tools to Jojo’s and I’m still seeing new shit in the game.
American distaste for games that seem “too Japanese” is not unlike Japanese distaste for games that seem “too American.” I’ve learned to ignore it now.
With that said . . . open-minded people have more fun.
lol how is this even a debate… game is as perverted as it gets
I don’t since leaves and fruit aren’t equals.
And if that’s the reason, we might as well be 10 years old saying “ewwwww, girls and variety”