Assault on San Bernardino - Dec 2

I have spoken my disagreements with Islam and Christianity, but what also gets on my nerves is anti-theist atheists like Pedojivo going: “look at this religion… killing this killing that… aw there should be no more religion, everyone should be an atheists”. Atheists are one of the last people to start pointing fingers; you group has just as much blood in their hands historically as the religions they criticize. Those religions at the least have track records of charity work, homeless people helping campaigns, anti-poverty campains, orphanages and hospitals… Atheists got none of that, yet here they are going off as to how Islam/Christianity is some massive neg on humanity.

If you idiots want to make it look like the world will be a better place if everyone is an atheist, then please go to North Korea and live there for at least a year and then come back and lets see you talk.

I didn’t spout the pro atheist babble child. I support the exclusion and removal of religion from state affairs.

That =! Atheist supremacy

Iz7

Warning, reading the lawyer statements for the arrested San Bernardino shooter is going to make you very very pissed off.

The following link contains serious cases of strawmen.

How cavernous is your asshole that you were able to pull out this mountain of bullshit?

You’re talking as if you could pull up numbers of charitable atheists. Not only that but you’re also trying to imply atheists have killed just as many people as religion. How would they do that? Even hinting at not believing could have gotten punished by death throughout most of written history and atheists never started a movement to exterminate those who didn’t agree with their view of life.

You don’t know shit, truly. You have absolutely no way of counting the beliefs of others nor a comparable war started by atheism so just stop it.

Taking away the guns doesn’t remove crime. It just goes elsewhere. Look at the UK.

Sure, there is far less death from guns. There’s still plenty from bladed weaponry. The UK has more rape, more muggings, more break-ins, and more violent crime in general.

Guns aren’t the reason people go insane. Guns aren’t the reason Muslim-extremists commit acts of terror. Removing guns solves neither of these things.

Removing guns might stop mass shootings, which is a start.

naaa, it will just encourage more bombings and stabbings. Getting rid of ONE weapon doesn’t stop violence.

@Raz0r Water is wet too. Even if it was possible to take every gun away from every person in America, how do we keep more from coming in from places like Mexico that we are next door neighbors with. It’s too easy to get illegal weapons in the US. But there are other ways to kill lots of people without guns, so I don’t know how the gun discussion is really relevant.

Mass shootings,

Mass bombings,

Murder sprees

assaul sprees

pick your poison bro

Just because there are other ways to kill people and to get guns doesn’t mean federal regulation shouldn’t be talked about. You will eventually die, so should we stop all medical research? No, but we can make the quality of life better so it’s worth the endeavor.

And to think this will stop all violence is naive. No one has even suggested it but you for whatever reason.

So if a black community get’s shot-up, it’s automatically racism. More black people die by black hands than white. It is a statistical FACT, and it has been true for over 20 years. If you think otherwise, YOU are racist.

Oh yes, let’s worry about the poor innocent muslims. Not the people that got shot. Who cares about them amirite? If it get’s linked to Islamic terrorism… you somehow think that’s racism. How stupid are you?

Wow… you’ll believe anything other than “a Muslim terror attack just happened”. Typical progressive. You hate white people. You actually believe that anyone that isn’t white should be assumed innocent, and whites should be presumed guilty.

It isn’t racism that labels Muslims as terrorists. It’s the fact that they blew-up the World Trade Center and crashed a plane into the Pentagon. Are you blind to the facts, or just stupid?

You seem so disappointed. Progressive thinking?

something like 90% of Americans own a gun. Or at least there are about 90 guns per every 100 americans. Gun legislation might help a bit, but won’t stop the already existing guns, nor will banning guns do anything similar.

I actually respect America’s view on guns, at times. I just don’t respect how every argument requires a gun. Cops killing people that scare them, people shooting each other over minor slights. And some people take the second amendment too serious.

People bitching about Muslim’s beliefs, yet willing to die for their belief in a gun. Hilarity.

Taking away the guns doesn’t remove crime. It just goes elsewhere. Look at the UK.

Would you like more rape? More violent crime? Then take away the guns, and this will happen. No more mass-shootings, but no more personal safety.

That number is off. There’s no way 90% of Americans own guns. Most guns are in the hands of just a portion of the population.

Regulation on guns isn’t about immediate effect, it’s about securing the future. I don’t know why some of you are fixated on immediate and short term results when this is about the long haul.

California already has assault weapon ban.
Which weapons are used in this mass shooting again?
Did you also know these guys had explosives and many other means all ready to go in their storage?

yeah that’s why I corrected my assessment:

I agree with regulation, one step at a time. But some people only seem to deal in absolutes. Banning guns is an absolute fucking mistake.

(Sigh. Here come the try-too-hard trolls. It had to happen eventually.)

I don’t have a problem with labeling Muslims who actually commit “acts of terror” as terrorists. My issue was the tendency to only label Muslims as terrorists where mass shootings and mass attacks in America are concerned with relatively few exceptions, like the already aforementioned Timothy McVeigh. That was already clear, though, so your deliberate misreading is all the more transparent.

Anyway, as far as actual news goes, there’s still nothing as of yet. Apparently next to no one (willing to talk on camera) knows anything about the wife of this duo, which is unsurprising given how insular a devout, extremely conservative Muslim woman would be.

Speaking of which, I’m still rather baffled the FBI and local police department let this happen so soon after the shooting. The landlord and the media that accepted the invitation are also to blame, of course, but who the fuck on the law enforcement side legitimately thought turning the house back over that soon was a good idea? I highly doubt they could have found everything of interest given how unsure they still are about so much.

Yeah but the problem with that ban is that California’s neighboring states don’t have such a thing. It’s been proven time and again that lax gun laws in other states create a network where people legally obtain these guns and sell them illegally to others. Were a federal ban in place it wouldn’t make it impossible to purchase those rifles but it would make it way fucking harder to find.

Please remember that you’re not searched when you travel between states but you are when you try to enter the country whether by land, sea, or air.

we have federal regulation.

Assault weapons are already banned, and if you want an automatic weapon, you can only get specific ones, need a gun vendor licence, pay a 500 tax, and pony up 10+k to kill people.

the entire notion of “gun control” is retarded because people want to ban things that are already banned. Modern AR-15 are not military style. The hardware cannot sustian automatic fire, nor does it allow for it unless you have personal access to c&s machine and the neccesary knowledge along with skill to make them automatic.

If the left wants to seriously talk about legislation to keep retarded people from having rifles, they need to address and publish a list of what they plan to do once legislation starts moving. Nobody with weight on the right will support these people unless they have a plan out of fears that any aptitude test adminstred will designed to ensure that the minimum amount of people can own a firearm.

-what are the mental conditions which bar gun ownership
-what are the mental aptitude tests that will be administered to prevent unstable people from owning them
-who will write these tests and who will grade these exams
-on what merit and scale will the tests be graded on to determine if you can own one, will being a hardcore cynic or pesimist be grounds for you not being able to legally own a firearm?

The left is insidious enough to push more than what they ask for. It’s happened in California, and the right that supports the NRA is scared shitless that you have a situation like you do in California, Chicago, or DC where the restrictions did absolutely nothing to curb violene.

Incorrect, you are signaled to stop so they can look at you. If you look suspicious, or it seems you are transporting significant amount of stuff they will ask you questions. And they couldn’t search every car if they wanted to, the amount of traffic that flows just between California and Arizona on the 10 would make that impossible.

Also, strawman purchases are federal felonies.

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

what good does more laws do, if the laws in place are not enforced?