Sessa, assuming you’re talking about vertical typhoons, the recovery on those are pretty bad… If she’s over your head and does it, just SJ up next to her and hit her with sj.strong -> sj.roundhouse. Just don’t SJ too early. You want to do it so that the Typhoon comes out right under her, not off to the side where you SJ’d. Rather easy. However, it’s been a bit since I’ve played a runaway storm, and I don’t remember the exact maximum height at which they can do a typhoon, and wether or not that’s out of reach of a sj.strong. If it is, then wait for them to shift down a few frames. That is, unless they have frame-perfect timing, in which case you either switch out to a character that has a counter to that strat, or you wait it out and lose. But it’s a good thing you’ll never have to switch out, as the chances of you running into someone with frame-perfect timing are too minute to be taken into consideration.
As for you Sabin… You don’t need to know someone in depth to quote them. Also, I explained in detail how Charlie counters all Runaway Storm’s attempts to gain a lead, and how, at worst, he breaks even.
Granted, if Storm starts with a respectable lead, she has a very good chance of winning(Note, a respectable lead, not a minuscule lead. She has to come down over time, and it doesn’t take all that much to make sure she blocks a SB and a Sonic Blade when she does.) But she won’t gain that lead playing runaway, and she does not have an overwhelming advantage playing rushdown(In fact, I’ve yet to play a storm that had a rushdown that seemed to have an advantage over me at all. But I doubt I’ve played the best.) His s.fierce stuffs her AD Forward rushdown, and Short Somersault Shell stuffs shallow Tri Jumps(Or you could just do a SJ back, sj.forward xx forward razor kick, OTG Ect… But that’s kind of a one trick pony against Tri Jumps), and she doesn’t have any particularly spectacular pokes, none that beat his c.forward, anyway.
If you want to insult someone about Charlie vs Storm strats, at least have the common sense to try it against the one who brought the matchup up.
And, I have a question for you, Spider-Dan. When’s the last time you read a scientific journal. In all honesty, that is, seeing as how I doubt that’s your strongpoint, right about now. I’d say there’s about a 1 in 100 chance that you’ve ever even picked one up. I say that because of subscription statistics, because, I ‘do’ read them, from time to time. A tenth of those subscribers contribute. As far as scientists and researchers go, scientific journals and weeklies, ect, form their society. There’s a major difference between that 1000th little splinter group, and mainstream society. the former, is task oriented. The latter, is socially oriented. Therefore, the former, has specialization(Read: Each unit of the group having a special and unique task designed to fit his or her abilities). The latter does not. I believe I mentioned in my previous post how specialization removes all the aspects of a group that are detrimental to intelligence.
Therefore… Are scientists and researches a part of mainstream society? Of course. Does that mean that mainstream society had anything to do with the contributions of said scientists and researchers? Definitely not.